Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:56:27.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of period doubling in the human cone flicker electroretinogram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2006

KENNETH R. ALEXANDER ,
MICHAEL W. LEVINE  and
BOAZ J. SUPER
KENNETH R. ALEXANDER
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
MICHAEL W. LEVINE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
BOAZ J. SUPER
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Electroretinogram (ERG) responses of the cone system to a flickering stimulus can exhibit a cyclic variation in amplitude. This phenomenon of synchronous period doubling has been attributed to a nonlinear feedback mechanism within the retina that alters response gain. The aim of the present study was to investigate intersubject variability in period doubling in the ERG of the human cone system, and to assess the implications of this variability for signal processing within the retina. Period doubling was examined in a group of 12 visually normal subjects, using sinusoidal full-field flicker and harmonic analysis of the ERG waveforms. For all subjects, the ERG responses to 32-Hz flicker (a frequency commonly used clinically) were characterized by a harmonic component at the stimulus frequency and at higher harmonics that were integral multiples of the stimulus frequency, as expected. In addition, six of the subjects showed period doubling at 32 Hz, characterized by harmonic components at integer multiples of a frequency that was half the stimulus frequency (the subharmonic). However, the subharmonic itself did not exceed the noise level. These findings suggest that the subharmonic is generated prior to or at the site that produces the nonlinear higher harmonics of the ERG response, and that a subsequent band-pass filter attenuates this subharmonic. Examination of harmonic components of the subjects' ERG waveforms at other stimulus frequencies, as well as a cycle-by-cycle analysis of the ERG waveforms, suggested that individual differences in period doubling may be due to intersubject variation in the strength of the hypothesized feedback signal and/or the time constant of its decay.

Keywords

ElectrophysiologyConeElectroretinogramFlicker
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , November 2005 , pp. 817 - 824
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, K.R., Barnes, C.S., & Fishman, G.A. (2003). ON-pathway dysfunction and timing properties of the flicker ERG in carriers of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, 4017–4025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, S.A., Elsner, A.E., & Kreitz, M.R. (1992). Analysis of non-linearities in the flicker ERG. Optometry and Vision Science 69, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y., Burns, S.A., & Kreitz, M.R. (1993). Red–green flicker photometry and nonlinearities in the flicker electroretinogram. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 10, 1413–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crevier, D.W. & Meister, M. (1998). Synchronous period-doubling in flicker vision of salamander and man. Journal of Neurophysiology 79, 1869–1878.Google Scholar
Kondo, M. & Sieving, P.A. (2001). Primate photopic sinewave flicker ERG: Vector modeling analysis of component origins using glutamate analogs. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 42, 305–312.Google Scholar
Lee, B.B., Dacey, D.M., Smith, V.C., & Pokorny, J. (1999). Horizontal cells reveal cone type-specific adaptation in primate retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 96, 14611–14616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, M.F., Holder, G.E., Seeliger, M.W., & Yamamoto, S. (2004). Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update). Documenta Ophthalmologica 108, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, J.V., Reits, D., Burgers, N.F., & Riemslag, C.C. (1992). Flicker electroretinograms: A systems analytic approach. Optometry and Vision Science 69, 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spekreijse, H. & Reits, D. (1982). Sequential analysis of the visual evoked potential in man: Nonlinear analysis of a sandwich system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 388, 72–97.Google Scholar