Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:52:26.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“A Bright Continuous Flow”: Phantasmagoria and History in A Tale of Two Cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2020

Amanda Shubert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores how Charles Dickens's representation of history in A Tale of Two Cities (1859), his historical novel of the French Revolution, is influenced by the Phantasmagoria. The Phantasmagoria was an optical ghost show popularized in Paris in the 1790s by the showman Etienne Gaspard Robertson. Using a hidden magic lantern in a pitch-dark room, Robertson projected images of ghosts and skeletons as well as historical personages from the French Revolution. Drawing on Dickens's own writings on the Phantasmagoria, the essay argues that Dickens's approach to historical fiction is informed by the Phantasmagoria's medium-specific effects and its cultural association with history and historical memory. Specifically, Dickens's turn to a dialectic of continuity and discontinuity to represent historical temporality is influenced by the dialectical visual effects of the Phantasmagoria and related mid-nineteenth-century optical technologies. A Tale of Two Cities has always resisted the dialectical-materialist paradigm for the nineteenth-century historical novel first developed by Georg Lukács and more recently elaborated by Fredric Jameson. By employing a media archaeological framework, this essay offers a revitalized approach to Dickens's historical representation that contextualizes it within nineteenth-century theories and discourses of optical perception.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , Winter 2020 , pp. 693 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ackroyd, Peter. Dickens. London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1990.Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen. Romanticism and the Rise of History. New York: Twayne, 1994.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “On History.” In Critical and Miscellaneous Essays in Five Volumes, vol. 2. New York: C. Scribner, 1903–4.Google Scholar
Castle, Terry. “Phantasmagoria: Spectral Technology and the Metaphorics of Modern Reverie.” Critical Inquiry 15, no. 1 (1988): 26–61.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. An Archaeology of Sympathy: The Sentimental Mode in Literature and Cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cook, Susan. “Season of Light and Darkness: A Tale of Two Cities and the Daguerrean Imagination.” Dickens Studies Annual 42 (2011): 237–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, Charles. David Copperfield. 1850. Edited by Jerome Hamilton Buckley. New York: W.W. Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Little Dorrit. 1857. New York: Modern Library, 2002.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend. 1865. Edited by Adrian Poole. London: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “Robertson, Artist in Ghosts.” Household Words, no. 253 (January 27, 1855): 553–58.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. A Tale of Two Cities. 1859. Edited by Richard Maxwell. New York: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. “On Terrorism and Morals: Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities.” Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas 3, no. 2 (2005): 49–74.Google Scholar
Groth, Helen. Moving Images: Nineteenth-Century Reading and Screen Practices. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “Illusions Past and Future: The Phantasmagoria and Its Specters.” Paper given at “Refresh: The First International Conference on the Histories of Art, Science and Technology.” Media Art History, www.MediaArtHistory.org, 2004.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “The Long and the Short of It: Centuries of Projecting Shadows, from Natural Magic to the Avant-Garde.” In The Art of Projection, edited by Douglas, Stan and Eamon, Christopher, 23–35. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “Phantasmagoria and the Manufacturing of Illusions and Wonder: Towards a Cultural Optics of the Cinematic Apparatus.” In The Cinema: A New Technology for the Twentieth Century, edited by Gaudreault, André, Russell, Catherine, and Véronneau, Pierre, 32–44. Lausanne: Editions Payot-Lausanne, 2004.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “‘We Are Here and Not Here’: Late Nineteenth Century Stage Magic and the Roots of Cinema in the Appearance (and Disappearance) of the Virtual Image.” In A Companion to Early Cinema, edited by Gaudreault, André, Dulac, Nicolas, and Hidalgo, Santiago, 52–63. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtamo, Erkki. “Towards a History of Peep Practice.” In A Companion to Early Cinema, edited by Gaudreault, André, Dulac, Nicolas, and Hidalgo, Santiago, 32–51. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Antinomies of Realism. New York: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
John, Juliet. Dickens’ Villains: Melodrama, Character, Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Timothy. “Birth of a Medium: Dickens, Griffith, and the Advent of Sentimental Cinema.” Victorian Studies 52, no. 1 (2009): 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, David J. Gothic Machine: Textualities, Pre-Cinematic Media and Film in Popular Visual Culture. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Translated by Hannah, and Mitchell, Stanley. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Mannoni, Laurent. The Great Art of Light and Shadow: Archaeology of the Cinema. Translated by Crangle, Richard. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Marion, Fulgence. The Wonders of Optics. New York: Scribner, 1871.Google Scholar
Marsh, Joss. “Dickensian ‘Dissolving Views’: The Magic Lantern, Visual Story-Telling, and the Victorian Technological Imagination.” Comparative Critical Studies 6, no. 3 (2009): 333–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Milner, Max. La Fantasmagorie: Essai sur l'optique fantastique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, Charles. The Emergence of Cinema: The American Screen to 1907. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1990.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. The Crowd: British Literature and Public Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Plunkett, John. “Optical Recreations and Victorian Literature.” In Literature and the Visual Media, edited by Seed, David, 1–28. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2005.Google Scholar
Robertson, Etienne Gaspard. “Fantasmagorie de Robertson, Cour des Capucines, près la place Vendôme. Tous les jours à sept heures.” Paris? 1800?Google Scholar
Schirmer and Scholl. Sketch of the Performances, at the Large Theatre, Lyceum, and a Short Account of the Origin, History and Explanation of All the Late Optical and Acoustic Discoveries, Called the Phantasmagoria, Ergascopia, Phantascopia, Mesoscopia, &c. Together with The Invisible Girl. London: Ward and Betham, 1805.Google Scholar
Scott, Sir Walter. Waverley. 1814. Edited by Hook, Andrew. New York: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
Smith, Grahame. Dickens and the Dream of Cinema. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Steinmeyer, Jim. Hiding the Elephant: How Magicians Invented the Impossible and Learned to Disappear. Cambridge, Mass.: Da Capo Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Stout, Daniel. Corporate Romanticism: Liberalism, Justice, and the Novel. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Williams, Carolyn. “Moving Pictures: George Eliot and Melodrama.” In Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion, edited by Berlant, Lauren, 105–44. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar