Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:46:26.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1988 Strasser, M., ‘Mill on Voluntary Self-Enslavement’, Philosophical Papers, xvii (1988), 171–83.Google Scholar
1990 Buckley, J. H., ‘John Stuart Mill and True Autobiography’, Studies in the Literary Imagination, xxiii (1990), 223–31.Google Scholar
1990 Kim, Ki Su, ‘J. S. Mill's Concept of Maturity as the Criterion in Determining Children's Eligibility for Rights’, Journal of the Philosophy of Education, xxiv (1990), 235–44.Google Scholar
1990 Wilson, F., Psychological Analysis and the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1991 Blaug, M., ed., Pioneers in Economics 16: Thomas Robert Malthus (1766–1834) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
1991 Blaug, M., ed., Pioneers in Economics 21: James Mill (1773–1836), John Rae (1796–1872), Edward West (1782–1828), Thomas Joplin (1790–1847), Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
1991 Carlisle, J., John Stuart Mill and the Writings of Character, Atlanta: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
1991 Green, M., ‘Sympathy and the Social Value of Poetry: J. S. Mill's Literary Essays’, University of Toronto Quarterly, lx (1991), 452–68.Google Scholar
1991 Green, M., ‘“Sympathy in Equality”: J. S. Mill's Arguments for Women's Equality’, The Victorian Studies Association Newsletter, xlvii (1991) 914.Google Scholar
1991 Hon, G., ‘A Critical Note on J. S. Mill's Classification of Fallacies’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, xlii (1991), 263–8.Google Scholar
1991 Jacobs, S., Science and British Liberalism: Locke, Bentham, Mill and Popper, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
1991 Kurer, O., John Stuart Mill: The Politics of Progress, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
1991 Kurer, O., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Welfare State’, History of Political Economy, xxiii (1991), 713–30.Google Scholar
1991 Laine, M., ed., A Cultivated Mind: Essays on J.S. Mill, Presented to John M. Robson, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1991 Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Gray, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1991 O'Grady, J., ‘Mill on the Prairies’, The Victorian Studies Association Newsletter, xlvii (1991), 1419.Google Scholar
1991 Park, T. P., ‘John Stuart Mill, Thomas Carlyle and the United States Civil War’, Historian, liv (1991), 93106.Google Scholar
1991 Rosen, F., ‘The Philosopher Flowers’, The Victorian Studies Association Newsletter, xlvii (1991), 78.Google Scholar
1991 Smart, P., Mill and Marx: Individual Liberty and the Roads to Freedom, Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
1991 Urbinati, N., ‘John Stuart Mill on Androgyny and Ideal Marriage’, Political Theory, xix (1991), 626–48.Google Scholar
1992 Brink, D. O., ‘Deliberative Utilitarianism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, xxi (1992), 67103.Google Scholar
1992 Donner, W., The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1992 Dyzenhaus, D., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Harm of Pornography’, Ethics, cii (1992), 534–51.Google Scholar
1992 Ellis, A., ‘Utilitarianism and International Ethics’, Traditions of International Ethics, ed. Nardin, T. and Mapel, D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158–79.Google Scholar
1992 Forget, E. L., ‘J. S. Mill and the Tory School: The Rhetorical Value of the Recantation’, History of Political Economy, xxiv (1992), 3159.Google Scholar
1992 Hampsher-Monk, I., A History of Modern Political Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 339408.Google Scholar
1992 Heans, S. J., ‘Was Mill a Moral Scientist’, Philosophy, lxvii (1992), 81101.Google Scholar
1992 Hekman, S., ‘John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women: The Foundation of Liberal Feminism’, Journal of the History of European Ideas, xv (1992), 681–6.Google Scholar
1992 Hirsch, A., ‘John Stuart Mill on Verification and the Business of Science’, History of Political Economy, xxiv (1992), 843–66.Google Scholar
1992 Jones, H. S., ‘John Stuart Mill as Moralist’, Journal of the History of Ideas, liii (1992), 287308.Google Scholar
1992 Kahan, A., Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burkhardt, John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1992 Kinzer, B. L., Robson, Ann P., and Robson, John M., A Moralist in and out of Parliament: John Stuart Mill at Westminster, 1865–68, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1992 Kurer, O., ‘J. S. Mill and Utopian Socialism’, Economic Record, lxviii (1992), 222–33.Google Scholar
1992 Majeed, J., Ungoverned Imaginings: James Mill's ‘History of British India’ and Orientalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 Smart, P., ‘Mill and Nationalism, National Character, Social Progress and the Spirit of Achievement’, Journal of the History of European Ideas, xv (1992), 527–34.Google Scholar
1992 Tinkeler, J. F., ‘J. S. Mill as a 19th Century Humanist’, Rhetorica—A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, x (1992), 165–91.Google Scholar
1992 Utilitas, iv (1992)Google Scholar
1992 Utilitas, iv (1992) Bumstone, D., ‘“The very culture of the feelings”: Poetry and Poets in Mill's Moral Philosophy’, 81104.Google Scholar
1992 Utilitas, iv (1992) Hoag, R. W., ‘J. S. Mill's Language of Pleasures’, 247–78.Google Scholar
1992 Utilitas, iv (1992) Long, R. T., ‘Mill's. Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character’, 279–97.Google Scholar
1993 Brecher, B., ‘Why Patronize Feminists—A Reply to Stove on Mill’, Philosophy, lxviii (1993), 397400.Google Scholar
1993 Day, J., ‘John Stuart Mill: On Liberty’, The Political Classics: Hamilton to Mill, ed. Forsyth, M., Keens-Soper, M., and Hoffman, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–45.Google Scholar
1993 Donner, W., ‘John Stuart Mill's Liberal Feminism’, Philosophical Studies, Ixix (1993), 155–66.Google Scholar
1993 Jacobs, S., ‘John Stuart Mill on the Tyranny of the Majority’, Australian Journal of Political Science, xxviii (1993), 726–30.Google Scholar
1993 Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, ed. Williams, G., London: Everyman.Google Scholar
1993 Narveson, J., ‘John Stuart Mill as Philosopher’, Dialogue, xxxii (1993), 315–27.Google Scholar
1993 Oakeshott, M., Morality and Politics in Modern Europe: The Harvard Lectures, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 7886.Google Scholar
1993 Ottow, R., ‘Why John Stuart Mill Called Himself a Socialist’, Journal of the History of European Ideas, xvii (1993), 479–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993 Shain, R., ‘Mill, Quine and Natural Kinds’, Metaphilosophy, xxiv (1993), 275–92.Google Scholar
1993 Skipper, R., ‘Mill and Pornography’, Ethics, ciii (1993), 726–30.Google Scholar
1993 Stewart, R. S., ‘Art for Arguments Sake: Saving Mill from the Fallacy of Composition’, Journal of Value Inquiry, xxvii (1993), 443–53.Google Scholar
1993 Stimson, S. C. and Milgate, M., ‘Utility, Property, and Political Participation: James Mill on Democratic Reform’, American Political Science Review, lxxxvii (1993), 901–11.Google Scholar
1993 Stove, D., ‘The Subjection of John Stuart Mill. The Intellectual Capacity of Women and Equality Between the Sexes’, Philosophy, lxviii (1993), 513.Google Scholar
1993 Utilitas, v (1993)Google Scholar
1993 Utilitas, v (1993) Kinzer, B. L., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Catholic Question in 1825’, 4968.Google Scholar
1993 Utilitas, v (1993) Lockhart, C. and Wildavsky, A., ‘The “Multicultural” Mill’, 255–75.Google Scholar
1993 Utilitas, v (1993) Riley, J., ‘On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure’, 291350.Google Scholar
1993 Zappen, J. P., ‘The Logic and Rhetoric of John Stuart Mill’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, xxvi (1993), 191200.Google Scholar
1994 Mill, John Stuart, Principles of Political Economy, ed. Riley, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1994 Mounce, H. O., ‘The Philosophy of the Conditioned’, Philosophical Quarterly, xliv (1994), 174–89.Google Scholar
1994 Parekh, B., ‘The Narrowness of Liberalism from Mill to Rawls’, The Times Literary Supplement, No. 4743 (1994), 1113.Google Scholar
1994 Pyle, A., ed., Liberty, Contemporary Responses to John Stuart Mill, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
1994 Ross, K. L., ‘Liberty—One Very Simple Principle: Response to Gertrude Himmelfarb's Critique of John Stuart Mill’, American Scholar, lxiii (1994), 159–60.Google Scholar
1994 Thiel, L., ‘On Stove on Mill on Women’, Philosophy, lxix (1994), 100–1.Google Scholar
1994 Wainwright, V., ‘Discovering Autonomy and Authenticity in “North and South”, Elizabeth Gaskell, John Stuart Mill and the Liberal Ethic’, Clio—A Journal of Literature, History and the Philosophy of History, xxiii (1994), 149–65.Google Scholar
1994 Waldron, J., ‘Kagen on Requirements, Mill on Sanctions’, Ethics, ci (1994), 310–24.Google Scholar
1994 West, E. G., ‘Joint Supply Theory Before Mill’, History of Political Economy, xxvi (1994), 267–78.Google Scholar
1994 Zastoupil, L., John Stuart Mill and India, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar