We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
1988Strasser, M., ‘Mill on Voluntary Self-Enslavement’, Philosophical Papers, xvii (1988), 171–83.Google Scholar
1990Buckley, J. H., ‘John Stuart Mill and True Autobiography’, Studies in the Literary Imagination, xxiii (1990), 223–31.Google Scholar
1990Kim, Ki Su, ‘J. S. Mill's Concept of Maturity as the Criterion in Determining Children's Eligibility for Rights’, Journal of the Philosophy of Education, xxiv (1990), 235–44.Google Scholar
1990Wilson, F., Psychological Analysis and the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1991Blaug, M., ed., Pioneers in Economics 16: Thomas Robert Malthus (1766–1834) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
1991Blaug, M., ed., Pioneers in Economics 21: James Mill (1773–1836), John Rae (1796–1872), Edward West (1782–1828), Thomas Joplin (1790–1847), Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
1991Carlisle, J., John Stuart Mill and the Writings of Character, Atlanta: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
1991Green, M., ‘Sympathy and the Social Value of Poetry: J. S. Mill's Literary Essays’, University of Toronto Quarterly, lx (1991), 452–68.Google Scholar
1991Green, M., ‘“Sympathy in Equality”: J. S. Mill's Arguments for Women's Equality’, The Victorian Studies Association Newsletter, xlvii (1991) 9–14.Google Scholar
1991Hon, G., ‘A Critical Note on J. S. Mill's Classification of Fallacies’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, xlii (1991), 263–8.Google Scholar
1991Jacobs, S., Science and British Liberalism: Locke, Bentham, Mill and Popper, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
1991Kurer, O., John Stuart Mill: The Politics of Progress, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
1991Kurer, O., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Welfare State’, History of Political Economy, xxiii (1991), 713–30.Google Scholar
1991Laine, M., ed., A Cultivated Mind: Essays on J.S. Mill, Presented to John M. Robson, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1991Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Gray, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1991O'Grady, J., ‘Mill on the Prairies’, The Victorian Studies Association Newsletter, xlvii (1991), 14–19.Google Scholar
1991Park, T. P., ‘John Stuart Mill, Thomas Carlyle and the United States Civil War’, Historian, liv (1991), 93–106.Google Scholar
1991Rosen, F., ‘The Philosopher Flowers’, The Victorian Studies Association Newsletter, xlvii (1991), 7–8.Google Scholar
1991Smart, P., Mill and Marx: Individual Liberty and the Roads to Freedom, Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
1991Urbinati, N., ‘John Stuart Mill on Androgyny and Ideal Marriage’, Political Theory, xix (1991), 626–48.Google Scholar
1992Brink, D. O., ‘Deliberative Utilitarianism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, xxi (1992), 67–103.Google Scholar
1992Donner, W., The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1992Dyzenhaus, D., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Harm of Pornography’, Ethics, cii (1992), 534–51.Google Scholar
1992Ellis, A., ‘Utilitarianism and International Ethics’, Traditions of International Ethics, ed. Nardin, T. and Mapel, D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158–79.Google Scholar
1992Forget, E. L., ‘J. S. Mill and the Tory School: The Rhetorical Value of the Recantation’, History of Political Economy, xxiv (1992), 31–59.Google Scholar
1992Hampsher-Monk, I., A History of Modern Political Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 339–408.Google Scholar
1992Heans, S. J., ‘Was Mill a Moral Scientist’, Philosophy, lxvii (1992), 81–101.Google Scholar
1992Hekman, S., ‘John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women: The Foundation of Liberal Feminism’, Journal of the History of European Ideas, xv (1992), 681–6.Google Scholar
1992Hirsch, A., ‘John Stuart Mill on Verification and the Business of Science’, History of Political Economy, xxiv (1992), 843–66.Google Scholar
1992Jones, H. S., ‘John Stuart Mill as Moralist’, Journal of the History of Ideas, liii (1992), 287–308.Google Scholar
1992Kahan, A., Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burkhardt, John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1992Kinzer, B. L., Robson, Ann P., and Robson, John M., A Moralist in and out of Parliament: John Stuart Mill at Westminster, 1865–68, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1992Kurer, O., ‘J. S. Mill and Utopian Socialism’, Economic Record, lxviii (1992), 222–33.Google Scholar
1992Majeed, J., Ungoverned Imaginings: James Mill's ‘History of British India’ and Orientalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992Smart, P., ‘Mill and Nationalism, National Character, Social Progress and the Spirit of Achievement’, Journal of the History of European Ideas, xv (1992), 527–34.Google Scholar
1992Tinkeler, J. F., ‘J. S. Mill as a 19th Century Humanist’, Rhetorica—A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, x (1992), 165–91.Google Scholar
1992Utilitas, iv (1992) Bumstone, D., ‘“The very culture of the feelings”: Poetry and Poets in Mill's Moral Philosophy’, 81–104.Google Scholar
1992Utilitas, iv (1992) Hoag, R. W., ‘J. S. Mill's Language of Pleasures’, 247–78.Google Scholar
1992Utilitas, iv (1992) Long, R. T., ‘Mill's. Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character’, 279–97.Google Scholar
1993Brecher, B., ‘Why Patronize Feminists—A Reply to Stove on Mill’, Philosophy, lxviii (1993), 397–400.Google Scholar
1993Day, J., ‘John Stuart Mill: On Liberty’, The Political Classics: Hamilton to Mill, ed. Forsyth, M., Keens-Soper, M., and Hoffman, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–45.Google Scholar
1993Donner, W., ‘John Stuart Mill's Liberal Feminism’, Philosophical Studies, Ixix (1993), 155–66.Google Scholar
1993Jacobs, S., ‘John Stuart Mill on the Tyranny of the Majority’, Australian Journal of Political Science, xxviii (1993), 726–30.Google Scholar
1993Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, ed. Williams, G., London: Everyman.Google Scholar
1993Narveson, J., ‘John Stuart Mill as Philosopher’, Dialogue, xxxii (1993), 315–27.Google Scholar
1993Oakeshott, M., Morality and Politics in Modern Europe: The Harvard Lectures, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 78–86.Google Scholar
1993Ottow, R., ‘Why John Stuart Mill Called Himself a Socialist’, Journal of the History of European Ideas, xvii (1993), 479–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993Shain, R., ‘Mill, Quine and Natural Kinds’, Metaphilosophy, xxiv (1993), 275–92.Google Scholar
1993Skipper, R., ‘Mill and Pornography’, Ethics, ciii (1993), 726–30.Google Scholar
1993Stewart, R. S., ‘Art for Arguments Sake: Saving Mill from the Fallacy of Composition’, Journal of Value Inquiry, xxvii (1993), 443–53.Google Scholar
1993Stimson, S. C. and Milgate, M., ‘Utility, Property, and Political Participation: James Mill on Democratic Reform’, American Political Science Review, lxxxvii (1993), 901–11.Google Scholar
1993Stove, D., ‘The Subjection of John Stuart Mill. The Intellectual Capacity of Women and Equality Between the Sexes’, Philosophy, lxviii (1993), 5–13.Google Scholar
1993Utilitas, v (1993) Kinzer, B. L., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Catholic Question in 1825’, 49–68.Google Scholar
1993Utilitas, v (1993) Lockhart, C. and Wildavsky, A., ‘The “Multicultural” Mill’, 255–75.Google Scholar
1993Utilitas, v (1993) Riley, J., ‘On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure’, 291–350.Google Scholar
1993Zappen, J. P., ‘The Logic and Rhetoric of John Stuart Mill’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, xxvi (1993), 191–200.Google Scholar
1994Mill, John Stuart, Principles of Political Economy, ed. Riley, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1994Mounce, H. O., ‘The Philosophy of the Conditioned’, Philosophical Quarterly, xliv (1994), 174–89.Google Scholar
1994Parekh, B., ‘The Narrowness of Liberalism from Mill to Rawls’, The Times Literary Supplement, No. 4743 (1994), 11–13.Google Scholar
1994Pyle, A., ed., Liberty, Contemporary Responses to John Stuart Mill, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
1994Ross, K. L., ‘Liberty—One Very Simple Principle: Response to Gertrude Himmelfarb's Critique of John Stuart Mill’, American Scholar, lxiii (1994), 159–60.Google Scholar
1994Thiel, L., ‘On Stove on Mill on Women’, Philosophy, lxix (1994), 100–1.Google Scholar
1994Wainwright, V., ‘Discovering Autonomy and Authenticity in “North and South”, Elizabeth Gaskell, John Stuart Mill and the Liberal Ethic’, Clio—A Journal of Literature, History and the Philosophy of History, xxiii (1994), 149–65.Google Scholar
1994Waldron, J., ‘Kagen on Requirements, Mill on Sanctions’, Ethics, ci (1994), 310–24.Google Scholar
1994West, E. G., ‘Joint Supply Theory Before Mill’, History of Political Economy, xxvi (1994), 267–78.Google Scholar
1994Zastoupil, L., John Stuart Mill and India, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar