Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T13:23:19.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consuming communities: the neighbourhood unit and the role of retail spaces on British housing estates, 1944–1958

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2015

JAMES GREENHALGH
JAMES GREENHALGH*
Affiliation:
School of History and Heritage, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article challenges perceptions about the origins and objectives of the ‘neighbourhood unit principle’ that emerged in 1944, by focusing on the location and purpose of shops. It argues that the positioning of retail spaces was central, but largely overlooked, to the socio-spatial schema that lay at the heart of the neighbourhood principle. Planners saw shops as a hub of face-to-face interaction, through which nebulous objectives like ‘community spirit’ might be engendered. However, planners did not account for the way that their need-based model of shopping might be undermined by the consumer habits of inhabitants and the changing objectives of retailers.

Type
Dyos Prize winner 2014
Information
Urban History , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 158 - 174
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ministry of Health (MoH), Design of Dwellings (London, 1944)Google Scholar; Ministry of Health/Ministry of Works (MoH/MoW), Housing Manual 1944 (London, 1944), 1Google Scholar.

2 Clapson, M., Invincible Green Suburbs, Brave New Towns: Social Change and Urban Dispersal in Post-War England (Manchester, 1998)Google Scholar; National Council of Social Services (NCSS), The Size and Social Structure of a Town (London, 1943), 8–9Google Scholar. On its popularity, see Collison, P., ‘Town planning and the neighbourhood unit concept’, Public Administration, 32 (1954), 463–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In 1951, 19.2% of county and borough planners in England and Wales used the neighbourhood principle in all designs, whilst 59.6% used it in some. For the popularity in new towns, see Homer, A., ‘Creating new communities: the role of the neighbourhood unit in post-war British planning’, Contemporary British History, 14 (2000), 63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Goss, A., ‘Neighbourhood units in British new towns’, Town Planning Review, 32 (1961), 66–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mumford, L., ‘The neighborhood and the neighborhood unit’, Town Planning Review, 24 (1954), 256–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pitt, G., ‘Neighbourhood planning in a new town’, Town and Country Planning, 28 (1959), 263–5Google Scholar; Willmott, P., ‘Housing density and town design in a new town’, Town Planning Review, 33 (1962), 124–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Clapson, Invincible Green Suburbs, 175–86; Dennis, N., ‘The popularity of the neighbourhood community idea’, in Pahl, R.E. (ed.), Readings in Urban Sociology (Oxford, 1968), 74–92, at 84–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glass, R., The Social Background of a Plan: A Study of Middlesbrough (London, 1948), 17–19Google Scholar; Mann, P.H., ‘The concept of neighborliness’, American Journal of Sociology, 60 (1954), 163–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mogey, J.M., Family and Neighbourhood: Two Studies of Oxford (Oxford, 1956)Google Scholar. For discussion of the preference for home-centred leisure pursuits, see Giles, J., Women, Identity and Private Life in Britain, 1900–50 (Basingstoke, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Langhamer, C., ‘The meanings of home in postwar Britain’, Journal of Contemporary History, 40 (2005), 341–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Clapson, M., Working-Class Suburbs: Social Change on an English Council Estate, 1930–2010 (Manchester, 2012)Google Scholar; Fielding, S., Thompson, P. and Tiratsoo, N., ‘England Arise!’ The Labour Party and Popular Politics in 1940s Britain (Manchester, 1997), 103–6Google Scholar.

6 Clapson, Working-Class Suburbs; Jones, B., ‘The uses of nostalgia: autobiography, community publishing and working-class neighbourhoods in post-war England’, Cultural and Social History, 7 (2010), 355–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Johnson, D.L., ‘Origin of the neighbourhood unit’, Planning Perspectives, 17 (2002), 227–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Keating, D. and Krumholz, N., ‘Neighborhood planning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20 (2000), 111–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lawhon, L.L., ‘The neighborhood unit: physical design or physical determinism?’, Journal of Planning History, 8 (2009), 111–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Clapson, Invincible Green Suburbs; Homer, ‘Creating new communities’. On inter-war anxieties, see Hollow, M., ‘Governmentality on the Park Hill estate: the rationality of public housing’, Urban History, 37 (2010), 117–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hollow, M., ‘Suburban ideals on England's interwar council estates’, Journal of the Garden History Society, 39 (2011), 203–17Google Scholar; Olechnowicz, A., Working-Class Housing in England between the Wars: The Becontree Estate (Oxford, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Robertson, D., McIntosh, I. and Smyth, J., ‘Neighbourhood identity: the path dependency of class and place’, Housing, Theory and Society, 27 (2010), 258–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Benson, J., The Rise of Consumer Society in Britain, 1880–1980 (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Hilton, M., Consumerism in Twentieth-Century Britain: The Search for a Historical Movement (Cambridge, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zweiniger-Bargielowska, I., Austerity in Britain: Rationing, Controls, and Consumption, 1939–1955 (Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar.

11 Bullock, N., Building the Post-War World: Modern Architecture and Reconstruction in Britain (London, 2002), 161 and 164Google Scholar.

12 Fielding, Thompson and Tiratsoo, ‘England Arise!’, 103–5.

13 Clapson, Invincible Green Suburbs, 29, 38 and 39; Goss, ‘Neighbourhood units in British new towns’, 64; Homer, ‘Creating new communities’, 63–5.

14 Beaven, B. and Griffiths, J., ‘Creating the exemplary citizen: the changing notion of citizenship in Britain 1870–1939’, Contemporary British History, 22 (2008), 203–25, at 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar. General concerns about working-class association are noted by Biddle, T.D., ‘British and American approaches to strategic bombing: their origins and implementation in the World War II combined bomber offensive’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 18 (1995), 91–144, at 96)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, G. Stedman, Outcast London: A Study in the Relationship between Classes in Victorian Society (Harmondsworth, 1984), 290Google Scholar, and highlighted in housing design by Olechnowicz, Working-Class Housing.

15 Dougill, W., ‘Wythenshawe: a modern satellite town’, Town Planning Review, 16 (1935), 209–15, at 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Olechnowicz, Working-Class Housing, 6. For more on Becontree, see Young, T., Becontree and Dagenham: A Report Made for the Pilgrim Trust (Becontree, 1934)Google Scholar.

16 Anderson, B., ‘A liberal countryside? The Manchester Ramblers’ Federation and the “social readjustment” of urban citizens, 1929–1936’, Urban History, 38 (2011), 84–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gunn, S., ‘The Buchanan Report, environment and the problem of traffic in 1960s Britain’, Twentieth Century British History, 22 (2011), 521–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Joyce, P., The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City (London, 2003)Google Scholar; Mort, F., ‘Fantasies of metropolitan life: planning London in the 1940s’, Journal of British Studies, 43 (2004), 120–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nead, L., Victorian Babylon: People, Streets and Images in Nineteenth-Century London (London, 2000)Google Scholar; Otter, C., ‘Making liberalism durable: vision and civility in the late Victorian city’, Social History, 27 (2002), 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Homer, ‘Creating new communities’, 64; Lee, T., ‘Urban neighbourhood as a socio-spatial schema’, Human Relations, 21 (1968), 241–67, at 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Patricios, N., ‘The neighborhood concept: a retrospective of physical design and social interaction’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19 (2002), 70–90Google Scholar.

19 Howard, E., Garden Cities of Tomorrow (Eastborne, 1985; orig. edn 1902)Google Scholar; Perry, C.A., The Neighbourhood Unit (London; orig. edn 1998)Google Scholar; Unwin, R., Town Planning in Practice: An Introduction to the Art of Designing Cities and Suburbs (Princeton, 1996; orig. edn 1909)Google Scholar. Perry is often cited as the originator of the neighbourhood unit, but work by Johnson, ‘Origin of the neighbourhood unit’, suggests that William E. Drummond, part of Chicago's reformist and progressive milieu, originated neighbourhood planning theory in several publications between 1913 and 1922.

20 Lee, ‘Urban neighbourhood as a socio-spatial schema’, 243; Perry, The Neighbourhood Unit.

21 Perry, The Neighbourhood Unit, 72–4.

22 NCSS, The Size and Structure of a Town, 7.

23 Nicholas, R., City of Manchester Plan (Norwich, 1945), 145Google Scholar.

24 Abercrombie, P. and Forshaw, J.H., County of London Plan (London, 1943), 28Google Scholar.

25 Deakin, D., Wythenshawe: The Story of a Garden City (Chichester, 1989), 45Google Scholar; Dougill, , ‘Wythenshawe’, 209. For details on Dougill see his obituary in Town Planning Review, 19 (1943), 5–6Google Scholar.

26 Manchester Guardian, ‘The New Manchester’, 6 Jan. 1944, 2. The files of the Wythenshawe Estate Special Committee detail a number of complaints about lack of facilities emanating from various residents groups throughout the 1940s, see Greater Manchester County Records Office (GMCRO)/GB127/Council Minutes (CM)/Wythenshawe Estate Special Committee (WESC), vols. 7–12, 15 Sep. 1939 – 1 Sep. 1950. In particular, Harry Lloyd's statement to the committee GMCRO/GB127/CM/WESC, vol. 9, 25 and 24 Apr. 1945.

27 MoH/MoW, Housing Manual 1944, 11; MoH, Design of Dwellings, 8; Silkin, L., ‘Housing layout in theory and practice’, Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, 55 (1948), 431–2, at 431Google Scholar; NCSS, The Size and Social Structure of a Town, 3.

28 Nicholas, City of Manchester Plan, 135.

29 Abercrombie, P. and Lutyens, E., A Plan for the City and County of Kingston upon Hull (Hull, 1945), 55Google Scholar.

30 Cohen, A., The Symbolic Construction of Community (London, 1985), 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Hull History Centre (HHC)/CTCR/1.12.5 report 17, 1 May 1944; Abercrombie and Lutyens, Plan for Kingston upon Hull, Plate IX.

32 Perry, The Neighbourhood Unit, 27.

33 Ibid., 30.

34 Frankenberg, R., Communities in Britain: Social Life in Town and Country (Harmondsworth, 1969), 197Google Scholar; Willmott, P. ‘Social research and new communities’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33 (1967), 387–98, at 390CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Nicholas, City of Manchester Plan, 135.

36 Tönnies, F., Harris, J. and Hollis, M., Community and Civil Society (Cambridge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Calder, A., The Myth of the Blitz (London, 1992), 180–209Google Scholar.

38 Foley, D.L., ‘British town planning: one ideology or three?’, British Journal of Sociology, 11 (1960), 211–31, at 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Calder, The Myth of the Blitz; Conekin, B., ‘“Here is the modern world itself”: the Festival of Britain's representations of the future’, in Conekin, B., Mort, F. and Waters, C. (eds.), Moments of Modernity: Reconstructing Britain, 1945–1964 (London, 1999), 228–46, at 245Google Scholar.

40 Nicholas, City of Manchester Plan, 135.

41 Dougill, ‘Wythenshawe’, 209.

42 Ibid., 212; Perry, The Neighbourhood Unit.

43 Dougill, ‘Wythenshawe’, 212.

44 Abercrombie and Lutyens, Plan for Kingston upon Hull, Plate XLI; Nicholas, City of Manchester Plan, Plate 52.

45 HHC/CTCR/1.12.5, file 24, report 17, 1 May 1944; HHC/CTAH/2/box 2020, undated, but c. Apr. 1945.

46 Stewart, M., The City: The Problems of Planning (Harmondsworth, 1972), 32Google Scholar.

47 For a general critique of the assumptions behind the neighbourhood unit, see Gans, H., The Urban Villagers (New York, 1962)Google Scholar; Lang, J., Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioural Sciences in Environmental Design (New York, 1987), 101Google Scholar; Silver, C., ‘Neighborhood planning in historical perspective’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 51 (1985), 161–74Google Scholar; Clapson, Invincible Green Suburbs, 156–95; Willmott, ‘Social research and new communities’, 390; Willmott, Peter, ‘Housing density and town design in a new town’, Town Planning Review, 33 (1962), 115–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Clapson, Invincible Green Suburbs; Frankenberg, Communities in Britain, 233–4; Glass, The Social Background of a Plan, 17–19; Homer, ‘Creating new communities’, 77–8; Mogey, Family and Neighbourhood; Olechnowicz, Working-Class Housing; Willmott, P., Community Initiatives: Patterns and Prospects (London, 1989), 85–9Google Scholar.

49 GMCRO/CM/WESC, vol. 9, 366, ‘Wythenshawe estate – shops’, 20 Feb. 1946.

50 GMCRO/CM/Housing Committee (HC), vol. 28, 168, ‘Provision of shopping facilities’, 22 May 1946.

51 For example, see HHC/CTAH/2/box 2187/file 64, ‘Proposed provision of blocks of shops’, 8 Aug. 1949.

52 Various correspondence, HHC/CTAH/2/box 2187/file 64, 8–19 Aug. 1949.

53 Nicholas, R., Manchester and District Regional Planning Proposal (Norwich, 1945), 44–6Google Scholar; GMCRO/CM/WESC, vol. 10, 102 ‘Shopping facilities’, 25 Nov. 1946; HHC/CTAH/2/box 2187/file 64, ‘Proposed provision of blocks of shops’, 8 Aug. 1949.

54 GMCRO/CM/WESC, vol. 8, 7–45, various correspondence, 24 Feb. 1942 – Jul. 1942.

55 Hilton, Consumerism in Twentieth-Century Britain, 137.

56 Zweiniger-Bargielowska, Austerity in Britain.

57 GMCRO/CM/WESC, vol. 8, 424, ‘J.W. Perry, 112 Sale Rd, Northenden’, 19 Dec. 1944.

58 GMCRO/CM/WESC, vol. 9, 54–5, ‘Letter from J.W. Perry’, 20 Mar. 1945.

59 Todd, S., ‘Poverty and aspiration: young women's entry to employment in inter-war England’, Twentieth Century British History, 15 (2004), 119–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; C. Wildman, ‘The spectacle of interwar Manchester and Liverpool: urban fantasies, consumer cultures and gendered identities’, University of Manchester Ph.D. thesis, 2007, 137–67.

60 Garreau, J., Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (New York, 1991)Google Scholar; Lowe, M.S., ‘Britain's regional shopping centres: new urban forms?’, Urban Studies, 37 (2000), 261–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Clark, W. and Rushton, G., ‘Models of intra-urban consumer behaviour and their implications for central place theory’, Economic Geography, 46 (1970), 486–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Day, R.A., ‘Consumer shopping behaviour in a planned urban environment’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 64 (1973), 77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Retailers’ Advisory Committee on Town Planning (RACTP), The Planning of Shopping Areas: Setting out the Principles which should be Followed in Planning Shopping Areas (London, 1944).

63 Ibid., 4.

64 Ibid., 4–11; Nicholas, Manchester and District Regional Planning Proposal, 37.

65 GMCRO/CM/HC, vol. 29, 25–9, various correspondence, 30 Jul. 1947 – 7 Nov. 1947. On the White Moss Estate in Blackley, Manchester, in 1947, new butchers and grocers were allocated. Complaints were received from several existing owners’ solicitors protesting the decision to provide additional butchers and grocers in an already ‘saturated’ market; 15 applications were received to fill two shops, a pattern repeated throughout the 1930s and 1940s; see GMCRO/CM/HC/vol. 25–30 for multiple examples.

66 HHC/CTAH 2/box 2173/file 100, ‘Longhill Estate shopping centre’, 30 Dec. 1954.

67 Ibid.

68 HHC/CTAH 2/box 2173/file 100, letter to Hull city architect from F.W. Woolworth and Co. Limited, 9 Feb. 1955.

69 Jefferys, J.B., Retail Trading in Britain, 1850–1950 (Cambridge, 1954)Google Scholar.

70 Alexander, A., ‘Retailing and consumption: evidence from war time Britain’, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 12 (2002), 39–57, at 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laulajainen, R. and Gadde, Lars-Erik, ‘Locational avoidance: a case-study of three Swedish retail chains’, Regional Studies, 20 (1986), 131–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Bromley, R. and Thomas, C., ‘The impact of out-of-centre retailing’, in Bromley, R. and Thomas, C. (eds.), Retail Change: Contemporary Issues (London, 1993), 126–50Google Scholar; Guy, C., ‘Corporate strategies in food retailing and their local impacts: a case-study of Cardiff’, Environment and Planning A, 28 (1996), 1575–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wrigley, N., Guy, C. and Lowe, M., ‘Urban regeneration, social inclusion and large store development: the Seacroft development in context’, Urban Studies, 39 (2002), 2101–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 RACTP, The Planning of Shopping Areas.

73 Jefferys, Retail Trading in Britain, 69–70. For an overview of the expansion of shopping as a leisure activity, see P. Newby, ‘Shopping as leisure’, in Bromley and Thomas (eds.), Retail Change, 208–28.

74 HHC/CTAH/2/box 2173/file 100, letter to Hull city architect from F.W. Woolworth and Co. Limited, 9 Feb. 1955.

75 HHC/CTAH/2/box 2173/file 100, ‘Longhill Estate main shopping centre’, 21 Sep. 1956 and 15 Nov. 1958.

76 Shaw, G., Curth, L. and Alexander, A., ‘Selling self-service and the supermarket: the Americanisation of food retailing in Britain, 1945–60’, Business History, 46 (2004), 568–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Zweiniger-Bargielowska, I., ‘Rationing austerity and the Conservative party recovery after 1945’, Historical Journal, 37 (1994), 173–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Hughes, A. and Hunt, K., ‘A culture transformed? Women's lives in Wythenshawe in the 1930s’, in Davies, A. and Fielding, S. (eds.), Workers Worlds: Cultures and Communities in Manchester and Salford, 1880–1939 (Manchester, 1992), 74–101Google Scholar; Jones, ‘The uses of nostalgia’, 355–74.