Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T11:57:38.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extinction and Transformation: An Abstract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Andrew T. Young*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, San Diego State University San Diego, California 92182-0334

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The basic principles of heterochromatic extinction show that the approach used in the visible should not work well in the infrared, where molecular line absorption rather than continuous scattering dominates the extinction. Not only does this extinction change very rapidly with wavelength (so that stellar color becomes only weakly correlated with effective extinction), but also many of the lines are saturated (so that Forbe’s curve-of-growth effect is much more severe in the IR.) Furthermore, broadband IR colors are more undersampled than those in the visible, so aliasing errors make them correlate even less with extinction.

Type
Chapter V: Reports of Meetings of Commissions
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1988

References

Forbes, J.D. 1842, Phil. Trans. 132, 225273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manduca, A., and Bell, R.A. 1979, Pub. A.S.P. 91, 848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfroid, J., and Heck, A. 1983, Astron. Astrophys. 120, 302306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufener, F. 1964, Pub. Obs. Geneve, Serie A, Fasc. 66 J7 Google Scholar
Young, A.T., and Irvine, W.M. 1967, Astron. J. 72, 945950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A.T. 1974, in Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 12 (Astrophysics, Part. A: Optical and Infrared), ed. by Carleton, N. (Academic Press, New York) pp. 123192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar