Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T20:41:04.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

41. Commission Pour L’Histoire de L’Astrolomie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2017

H. Dingle

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part III Rapports et Comptes-Rendus des Séances des Commissions
Information
Transactions of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , 1957 , pp. 592 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Imperial College Bookstall 1957

References

Bibliography

Translations and reissues

(1) Al-Bitrūji, , De Motibus Celorum (Univ. of California Press, 1952. 180 pp.). [Critical edition of the Latin translation of Michael Scott, by F. J. Carmody.]Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Dialogue on the Great World Systems (Chicago Univ. Press, 1953. Pp. lx + 506). [The Salusbury translation of 1661, revised, annotated, and with an introduction, by Giorgio de Santillana; contains an astronomical note on the two Systems by W. D. Stahlman.]Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, etc., translated by Stillman Drake, foreword by Einstein, Albert (Univ. of California Press, 1953. Pp. xxviii + 496). [A new translation into standard English prefaced by a sketch of the historical setting of the work and supplemented by explanatory notes.]Google Scholar
Macrobius, , Commentary on the Dream of Cicero, transl, with an introduction and notes by Stahl, W. H. (New York, Columbia Univ. Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Ptolemy, , The Almagest, transl, by Taliaferro, R. Catesby, pp. 1–478 in Vol. xvi of the Great Books of the Western World (Chicago, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1952). [This volume also contains a complete English translation of Nicolaus Copernicus, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres (pp. 479-838), a partial translation of Johannes Kepler, Epitome of Copernican Astronomy (pp. 839-1004), and a translation of Book v only of Johannes Kepler, The Harmonies of the World (pp. 1005-85), all by the late Wallis, C. G..]Google Scholar
Dreyer, J. L. E., A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler (New York, Dover, 1953). [A revised edition of Dreyer’s History of the Planetary Systems (1906), with a foreword and a bibliography by Stahl., W. H.]Google Scholar
Chaucer, , The Equatorie of the Planetis, edited from Peterhouse, Cambridge, MS. 75. I, by Price, Derek J. with a linguistic analysis by Wilson, R. M. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1955. Pp. xvi + 214).Google Scholar

New books

Abetti, G., The History of Astronomy (New York, Schuman, 1952; London, Sidgwick and Jackson, 1954).Google Scholar
Baumgardt, C., Johannes Kepler: Life and Letters (New York, Philosophical Library, Inc., 1951. 209 pp.).Google Scholar
Brunet, P., La Vie et l’Œuvre de Clairaut. Collection of articles which originally appeared in Rev. Hist. Sci. 4 (1951), 13–40; 109-53; 5 (1952), 334-49; 6 (1953). 1-17.Google Scholar
Daumas, M., Les Instruments Scientifiques aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1953. 417 PP.).Google Scholar
Milne, E. A., Sir James Jeans (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O., Astronomical Cuneiform Texts: Babylonian Ephemerides of the Seleucid Period for the Motion of the Sun, the Moon and the Planets. (Institute of Advanced Studies, Princeton, U.S.A. London, Lund-Humphries, 1955. 3 vols., 842 pp., 288 plates.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. F., The Scientific Work of RenS Descartes (London, 1952).Google Scholar
Sidgwick, J. B., William Herschel: Explorer of the Heavens (London, Faber and Faber, 1953. 228 pp.).Google Scholar
Slouka, H. et al., Astronomy in Czechoslovakia from the earliest times to to-day (Prague, 1952. 346 pp.). [In Czech.]Google Scholar
Soonawala, M. F., Maharaja Sawai Jai Singh II and his Observatories (Jaipur, Jaipur Astronomical Society).Google Scholar
Webb, E. J., The Names of the Stars (London, Nisbet, 1952).Google Scholar
Aiton, E. J., ‘The Development of the Theory of the Tides in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’.Google Scholar
Dicks, D. R., ‘Hipparchus—A Critical Edition of the Extant Material for ris Life end Works’Google Scholar
Hewitt, K. V., ‘The Astronomical Work of the Rev. James Bradley, Third Astronomer Royal’.Google Scholar
Ronan, C. A., ‘The Cometography of A. G. Pingré’.Google Scholar

Articles

Abetti, G., ‘Histoire et Problemes de la Physique solaire’, Ciel et Terre, Année 70, 161–74, 1954.Google Scholar
Abetti, G. ‘Annibale Riccò, l’Accademia Gioenia e l’Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania’, Bolletino delle sedute dell’ Accademia Gioenia di Scienzi naturali in Catania, Ser. 4, Vol. 111, Fase, 1, 1955.Google Scholar
Abetti, G. ‘Attilio Colacevich (1906-53)’, Annales d’Astrophysique, 16, 291, 1953.Google Scholar
Aiton, E. J., ‘Galileo’s Theory of the Tides’, Ann. Sci. 10, 44–57, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, A., ‘The Pilgrimage of Pingré: An Astronomer-Monk of Eighteenth-Century France’, Ann. Sci. 9, 47–63, 1953.Google Scholar
Armitage, A. ‘Jeaan Picard and His Circle’, Endeavour, 13, 17–21, 1954.Google Scholar
Armitage, A. ‘Chappe D’Auteroche: A Pathfinder for Astronomy’, Ann. Sci., 10, 277, 1954.Google Scholar
A. D. Atkinson, , ‘William Derham, F.R.S. (1657-1735)’, Ann. Sci. 8, 368–92, 1952.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A., ‘Hadari w-al-Wazn’, Sky and Telescope, 13, 328–9, 1954.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A. ‘Sah and Sopdet’, Sky and Telescope, 12, 93, 1953.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A. ‘The Meaning of Alphecca’, Sky and Telescope, 11, 111, 1952.Google Scholar
Dicks, D. R., ‘Ancient Astronomical Instruments’, J. Brit. Astr. Assoc. 64, 77–85, 1954.Google Scholar
Dingle, H., ‘Astronomy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, Science Medicine and History: Essays written in honour of Charles Singer, Vol. 1, 455–68, 1953.Google Scholar
van den Dungen, F. H., Cox, J. F. et van Mieghem, J., ‘Sur une question mise au concours, en 1752, par l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Berlin’, Ciel et Terre, Annèe 68, 61–4, 1952.Google Scholar
Dvoichenko-Markov, E., ‘The Pulkovo Observatory and some American Astronomers of the Mid-nineteenth Century’, Isis, 43, 243–6, 1952.Google Scholar
Evanss, D. S., ‘Two Items of Astronomical Africana’, Quart. Bull S. Afr. Libr. 7, 3–9, 1952. [Concerning a letter from Lacaille and notes on documents relating to Sir John Herschel.]Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, J. O., ‘100 Jahre solarterrestriche Erscheinuugen’, Experientia, 8, 476–7, 1952.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, J. O. ‘Ein Basler Problem der sphärischen Astronomie aus dem Nachlass von Johann I und Niklaus I Bernoulli’, Verhandlungen Nat. Ges. Basel, 63, 273–95, 1952.Google Scholar
Gandz, S., ‘The Division of the Hour rn Hebrew Literature’, Osiris, 10, 10–34, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaythorpe, S. B., ‘Horrocks’s Observations of the Transit of Venus 1639 November 24 (o.s.)’, J. Brit. Asir. Assoc. 64, 309–15, 1954.Google Scholar
Gerlo, A., ‘Copernic et Simon Stevin’, Ciel et Terre, Année 69, 277–88, 1953.Google Scholar
Gingerich, O., ‘Messier and His Catalogue’, Sky and Telescope, 12, 225 ff., 228ff 1953.Google Scholar
Glaser, O. C. and Wrinch, Dorothy, ‘Diffraction Patterns in Nineteenth-Century Astronomy and Twentieth-Century X-Ray Crystallography’, Science Medicine and History: Essays written in honour of Charles Singer, Vol. 11, 197–202, 1953.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. A., ‘The Apotheosis of Astronomy’, Science Medicine and History: Essays written in honour of Charles Singer, Vol. 1, 75–82, 1953.Google Scholar
Guyot, E., ‘La Rotation de la Terre et ses Variations’, Annales Guébhard-Séverine, 29 e Année, 117–39, 1953.Google Scholar
Higgins, K., ‘The Classification oo Sundials’, Ann. Sci. 9 342–58, 1953.Google Scholar
Hogg, Helen S., Series of Articles entitled ‘Out of Old Books’, in J. Roy. Astr. Soc. Can. Vols. XL-XLVII, 1946-54, on various subjects in the history of astronomy.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. R., ‘Astronomical Text-books in the Sixteenth Century’, Science Medicine and History: Essays written in honour of Charles Singer, Vol. 1, 285–302, 1953.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S., ‘A Fifteenth-Century Planetary Computer; al-Kāshi’s “Tabaq al-Manāteq„’, Isis, 43, 42–50, 1952.Google Scholar
Kibre, P., ‘Lewis of Caerleon, Doctor of Medicine, Astronomer, and Mathematician (d. 1494?)’, Isis 43, 100–8, 1952.Google Scholar
Koyré, A., ‘An Unpublished Letter of Robert Hooke to Isaac Newton’, Isis, 43, 312–37, 1952.Google Scholar
Koyré, A., ‘La Mécanique céleste de J. A. Borelli’, Rev. Hist. Sci. 5, 101–38, 1952.Google Scholar
Koyré, A., ‘An Experiment in Measurementx2019;, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 97, 222–37, 1953. [A discussion of early pendulum experiments.]Google Scholar
Lundmark, K., ‘The Messsanic Ideas and their Astronomical Background’, Actes du VIIe Congrès Int. d’Hist. Sci. 436–9, 1953.Google Scholar
Melchior, P. J., ‘Sur une ebservatton faite par Copernic et Dominique Maria’, Acad. R. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. 5e série, 40, 416–17, 1954.Google Scholar
Melmore, S., ‘Nathaniel Pigott’s Observatory 1781-1793’, Ann. Sci. 9, 281–6, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, H., ‘Les Montres solaires du Musée de la Vie Wallonnn à Liège’, Ciel et Terre, Année 68, 253–87, 1952. [See also Année 69, 199-215, 1953.]Google Scholar
Michel, H., ‘Les Tubes optiques avant le Télescope’, Ciel et Terre, Année 70, 175–84, 1954.Google Scholar
Millas-Vallicrosa, J., ‘Sobre las Tablas Astronomicas del Rey Pedro IV de Aragon’, Actes du VIIe Congrès Int. d’Hist. Sci. 451–4, 1953.Google Scholar
Miller, Genevieve, ‘A Seventeenth-Century Astrological Diagnosis’, Science Medicine and History: Essays written in honour of Charles Singer, Vol. 11, 28–33, 1953.Google Scholar
Miller, W. J., ‘Galileo’s Visits so Rome’, Sky and Telescope, 11, 221 ff., 246 ff., 1952.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O., ‘Tamil Astronomy: A Study in the History of Astronomy in India’, Osiris, 10, 252–76, 1952.Google Scholar
Norlind, W., ‘Copernicus and Luther: A Critical Study’, Isiss 44, 273–6, 1953.Google Scholar
Norlind, W., ‘A Hitherto UnpubHished Letter from Tycho Brahe to Christopher Clavius’, Observatory, 74, 20–3, 1954.Google Scholar
Norling, G., ‘The Date for the Construction of the First Temple of Jerusalem and its probable connection with an Appearance of Halley’s Comet’, Actes du VIIe Congrès Int. d’Hist. Sci. 458–60, 1953.Google Scholar
de Orus, Juan J., ‘Teorias sobre los brazos de las nebulosas espirales’, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, Septième Année, 141–60, 1954.Google Scholar
Pannekoek, A., ‘The Astronomical System of Herakleides’, Proc. Astr. Inst. Amsterdam, B, 55, 33–41. 1952.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, J., ‘En marge d’un centenaire. L’expérience de Foucault et sa signification morale’, Rev. univer. Brux. nouv. série, 4° ann. 2–3, 220-39, 1952.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, J., ‘Lettres inédites de Condorcet’, Osirisi 10, 322–7, 1952.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, J., ‘A propos de la première édition des Principia de Newton’, Acad. R. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. 5-série, 38, 219–20, 1952.Google Scholar
Price, D. J., Articles on a probable ‘Chaucer’ manuscript discovered at Peterhouse, Cambridge: Times Lit. Suppl. 29 February and 7 March 1952. Nature, 170, 474-5, 1952. J. S.W. Essex Techn. Coll. 3, 154-69, 1952. Proc. Roy. Inst. Great Britain, 35, 396-407, 1953. Bull. Brit. Soc. Hist. Sci. 1, 223-6, 1953.Google Scholar
Price, D. J., ‘A Collection of Armillary Spheres and other antique scientific Instruments’, Ann. Sci. 10, 172–87, 1954.Google Scholar
Przypkowski, T., ‘Les instruments astronomiques de Nicolas Copernic et l’édition d’Amsterdam {1617) de De Revolutionibus’, Arch. Internal. d’Hist. Sci. Sixième Année, 220–6 (2 pl.), 1953.Google Scholar
Rodgers, R. F., ‘Newly-Discovered Byzantine Records of Comets’, J. Roy. Astr. Soc. Can. 46, 177–80, 1952.Google Scholar
Ronchi, V., ‘Du De Refractione au De Telescopio de G. B. Della Porta’, Rev. d’Hist. Sci. 7, 34–59, 1954.Google Scholar
Rosen, E., ‘Galileo on the Distance between the Earth and the Moon’, Isis, 43, 344–8, 1952.Google Scholar
Rosen, E., ‘Did Galileo claim he invented the Telescope?’, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 98, 304–12, 1954.Google Scholar
Ruddy, H. E., ‘The Transit to Venus, 1874’, J. Brit. Astr. Assoc. 64, 304–9, 1954.Google Scholar
Sayili, A., ‘The “Observation Well„’, Actes du VIIe Congrès Int. d’Hist. Sci. 542–50, 1953.Google Scholar
Schmeidler, F., ‘A History of Extreme Errors in Fundamental Decimations’, Occ. Notes Roy. Astr. Soc. Vol. 2, no, 14, pp. 160–6, 1952.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O., ‘On the Computation of the Ahargana’, Centaurus, 2, 140–80, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouteet, A., ‘De invoering van de Gregoriaanse Kalender te Brugge’, Handelingen van het Genootsch. voor Geschied…te Brugge, 89, 136–45, 1952.Google Scholar
Sconzo, P., ‘Amerigo Vespucci (1454-1512)’, Coelum, Bologna, 22, 177–80, 1954.Google Scholar
Seydl, O., ‘History of the Museum Mathematicum Jesuitarum in the College of St Clemens in the Old Town of Prague’, Publ. Roy. Bohem. Soc. Sci., Prague, 59 pp., 1951. [In Czech.]Google Scholar
Seydl, O., ‘Bibliography of Scientific Papers of Rev. F. Mariin Aloys David, Director of Prague Observatory and Member of Roy. Bohem. Soc. Sci. in Prague’, Publ. Roy. Bohem. Soc. Sci., Prague, 22 pp., 1952. [In Czech.]Google Scholar
Stahlman, W. D., ‘On the Date of a Comet Ascribed to A.D. 1238’, Isis, 43, 348–51, 1952.Google Scholar
Struve, O., ‘The Variation of Latitude’, Sky and Telescope, 11, 109 ff., 142 ff., 1952.Google Scholar
Struve, O., ‘Lomonosov’, Sky and Telescope, 13, 118–20, 1954.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L., ‘Astronomical lnd Chronological Calculations at Newminster in 1428’, Ann. Sci. 7, 275–83, 1951.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L., ‘A Record of Eclipsef for the Years 1478 to 1506’, Isis, 43, 252–6, 1952.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L., ‘Albumasar in Sadan’, Isis, 45, 22–32, 1954.Google Scholar
Witchell, W. M., ‘The Story of the Greenwich Transit Circle’, Occ. Notes Roy. Astr. Soc. Vol. 2, no. 14, pp. 147–59, 1952.Google Scholar
Woolf, H., ‘Eighteenth-Century Observations so the Transits so Venus’, Ann. Sci. 9, 76–90, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinner, E., ‘Die astronomische Bestimmung der Empfängniszeit und der Schwangerschaftsdauer’, Sudhoffs Archiv, 37, 432, 1953.Google Scholar
Zinner, E., ‘Die Remeis-Sternwarte von 1889-1953’, Naturforschende Gesellschaft Bamberg, Sonderdruck aus dem XXXIV. Bericht 1954.Google Scholar

Japanese papers

Hasimoto, Masukiti, ‘The date of the founding of Japanese empire’, Sigaku, Vol. 53 (1953), nos. 1-2 and vol. 54 (1954), nos. 3-4.Google Scholar
Oota, S., ‘When was the calendar mark “mitu„, signifying Sunday introduced into Japan?’, Nippon Rekisi, no. 72, May 1954.Google Scholar
Naito, T., ‘Priest Kûkai and the calendar of seven-day weeks’, Nippon Rekisi, no. 75, August 1954.Google Scholar
Hasimoto, Manpei, ‘On the time-system of Japan’, Tenmon Sôhô, 1953 and 1954.Google Scholar
Tamura, S., ‘Theory of the earth motion of the Li Dynasty in Korea’, J. Hist. Sci., Japan, no. 30, July 1954.Google Scholar
Yabuuti, K., ‘ndian and Arabian astronomy in China’, Silver Jubilee Volume of the Zinbun Kagaku Kenkyûsyo, October 1954. [In English.]Google Scholar

Russian papers

List of Problems to be studied by the newly-formed Commission for the History of Astronomy organized by the Astronomical Council of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 31, 575–6, 1954.Google Scholar
Barabashev, N. P., ‘Progress of Astronomy in the Ukraine’, Nature, U.S.S.R. no. 8, 1954. Russian translation of ້tudes de l’Astronomie stellaire, by Wilhelm Struve. With an essay on Struve by M. S. Eigenson and A. A. Mikhailov.Google Scholar
Selected Studies on Astronomy by M.A. Kovalsky. With biography of author and comments by D. J. Martynov.Google Scholar
Selected Studies on Astronomy by W. K. Zerassky. With biography by S. N. Blazhko and a paper on Zerassky by B. A. Vorontsov-Velyaminov.Google Scholar
Deutsch, A. N., ‘On W. Struve’s account of a parallax determination in 1837’, Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 29, no. 5, 597–601, 1952.Google Scholar
Lytinetzky, J. B., a monograph on M. V: Lomonosov and instrument construction (Moscow, 1952).Google Scholar
Tchenakall, V. L., a monograph on Russian makers of scientific instruments in the early eighteenth century (Leningrad, 1953. 256 pp.).Google Scholar
Tchenakall, V. L., ‘A. I. Kolotoshine, Maker of Asrronomical Insrruments in Lomonosov’s Time’, Astr. J. U.S.S.R. no. 5, 602–20, 1952.Google Scholar
Sharonov, V. V., ‘The Phenomenon of Lomonosov’, Astr. J. U.S.S.R. no. 6, 728–37, 1952.Google Scholar

Papers on the first Russian stellar maps:

Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B. A., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 5, 552–6, 1953.Google Scholar
Nabokov, M. E., Asttr J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 2, 97, 1954.Google Scholar
Zhafranovsky, K. I., Bull, of All-Union Geog. Soc. no. 2, 195–9, 1953.Google Scholar
Fel, S. E., ‘Cartography in Russia in the Eighteenth Century’, (Doctorate Dissertation, Moscow Univ.).Google Scholar
Shybanov, F. A., ‘Ruusian Geodesy in nhe Nineteenth Century and the Form and Dimensions of the Earth’, Bull. All-Union Geog. Soc. no. 4, 463–8, 1953.Google Scholar
Melnikov, O. A., ‘Pioneering Russian studies in astrospectroscopy’, Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 6, 658–61, 1953.Google Scholar
Perel, J. G., articles on prominent Russian astronomers, as follows:Google Scholar
Federov, V. F., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 1, 107–10, 1953.Google Scholar
Perevozhikovaa, D. M. Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 2, 229–36, 1953.Google Scholar
Inokhoozeva, P. V., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 29, no. 3, 363–9, 1952.Google Scholar
Gusseva, M. M., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 29, no. 4, 490–4, 1952.Google Scholar
Gamaleja, P. J., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 1, 100–6, 1953.Google Scholar
Shcheglov, V. P., ‘On P. K. Zalessky’, Astr. J. U.S.S.R. 30, no. 4, 444–52, 1953.Google Scholar
Shcheglov, V. P., ‘On the 80th anniversary of the Tashkent Observatory’, Nature, U.S.S.R. no. 4, 59–63, 1954.Google Scholar
Korytnikov, S. N., ‘Origin of the Russian Astronomical Observatory of V. P. Engelhardt in Dresden’, Astr. J. U.S.S.R. no. 6, 558–66, 1954.Google Scholar
Gorshkov, P. M., ‘On A. A. Ivanov, of St Petersburg University’, Publ. Astr. Obs. Len. Univ. 13, 192–252, 195.Google Scholar
Papers on Ulugh-Bey and his Samarkand Observatory: Kary-Nijazov, T. N., Nature U.S.S.R. no. 10, 77–82, 1952.Google Scholar
Nielssen, V. A., Publ. Inst. Hist. Arch. Acad. Sci. of Uzhbek S.S.R. no. 5, 101–27, 1953.Google Scholar
Shishkin, V. A., Publ. Inst. Hist. Arch. Acad. Sci. of Uzhbek S.S.R. no. 5, 3–100, 1953.Google Scholar
Shcheglov, V. P., Astr. J. U.S.S.R. no. 2, 224–8, 1953.Google Scholar
Sadykov, H. U., a monograph on Biruni of Khorez (Moscow, State Technical Publishing House, 1953).Google Scholar
Subbotin, M. F., ‘Nassyr-eddin Tusi on the Theory of the Motion of the Sun and Planets’, Bull. Akad. Sci. Azerhaidzhan, S.S.R. no. 5, 51–8, 1952.Google Scholar
Baranovskaya, L. S., a description of MS. ‘Composition on Co-ordinates’ (1712), the earliest known work on mathematics and astronomy in the Mongolian language, Publ. Inst. Hist. Nat. Sci. Engl. Vol. 1, 1954.Google Scholar
A volume on the history of Pulkovo Observatory, containing papers by Orlov, B. A., Zverev, M. S., Némiro, A. A., Krat, V. A., and Melnikov, O. A., Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 1953.Google Scholar

Forthcoming Russian publications

Papers read at the Copernicus 410th Anniversary Meeting, 1954.Google Scholar
Papers read at the 300th Anniversary of reunion of the Ukraine with Russia, 1954.Google Scholar
Papers read at the reopening of Pulkovo Observatory, 1954.Google Scholar
Selected Papers by A. A. Belopolsky. With biography of author and comments by Melnikov, O. A..Google Scholar
A new publication on Investigations in the History of Astronomy (prepared by a U.S.S.R. Commission).Google Scholar
Vol. IV of Complete Works of M. V. Lomonosov , containing all his astronomical work.Google Scholar