Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:24:50.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

41. Commission de L’Histoire de L’Astronomie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

P. G. Kulikovsky
P. G. Kulikovsky*
Affiliation:
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow, U.S.S.R.

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Transactions of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , 1962 , pp. 459 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Academic Press 1962 

References

Bibliography

Aaboe, A. On Babylonian Planetary Theories. Centaurus 5, 209, 1958.Google Scholar
Abetti, G. Osservatori Astronomici d’Italia. VII. L’osservatorio astronomico di Trieste. Luce e Immag. 11, no. 2, 3, 1957.Google Scholar
Abetti, G. Les disciples de Galileo, Sdentici, Bologna 92, 8, 1957.Google Scholar
Abetti, G. Cenni storici sull’inizio ed il progresso delle ricerche sul sole. Boll. Geod. e Sci. affini 16, 635, 1957.Google Scholar
Abetti, G. Italo-American recollections in George Ellery Hale’s life. Atti Fond. Ronchi 15, 235, 1960.Google Scholar
Alter, G. Two Renaissance Astronomers: David Gans, Joseph Delmedigo. Rozpr. ceské Akad. 68, no. 11, 93 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Ahnert, P. Indianische Felszeichungen-ein Bericht von der Supernova 1054? Sterne 35, nos. 5-6, 116, 1959.Google Scholar
Argyrakos, I. Etude de ‘l’astrolabe de Synesius Cyrène’ (4-e siècle) Athens, 14 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Armitage, A. The Astronomical Work of Nicholas Luis de Lacaille. Ann. Sci. 12, 163, 1956.Google Scholar
Arrighi, G. Il real osservatorio astronomico di Marlia (Lucca). Physis 1, 165, 1959.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. Roger Boskovich and the moon’s atmosphere. Sky and Telesc. 16, 378, 1957.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. Navigators of the old Pacific. Sky and Telesc. 17, 180, 1958.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. Julius Schmidt and the Moon. Sky and Telesc. 17, 290, 1958.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. The brothers Henry. Sky and Telesc. 17, 394, 1958.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. Astronomy in Greenland. Sky and Telesc. 18, 85, 1958.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. Lassell’s 4-ft telescope. Sky and Telesc. 18, 664, 1959.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, J. Some Huygens telescopes. Sky and Telesc. 18, 559, 1959.Google Scholar
Auger, L. Les idées de Roberval sur le système du monde. Rev. Hist. Sci., Paris 10, 226, 1957.Google Scholar
Baillaud, R. Copernic et ses précurseurs dans l’étude du système du monde. Ann. Obs. Besançon 5, no. 2, 1957. Bull. Soc. Astr. pop. Toulouse, no. 380-381, 25, 1956.Google Scholar
Baillaud, R. Histoire de l’horloge astronomique de la cathédrale Saint-Jean de Besançon. Ann. franç. Chronom. 13, 69, 1959.Google Scholar
Balan, S. Galileo Galilee. Bucuresti. Ed. tehn. 188 pp. (roum.), 1957.Google Scholar
Barani, S. H. Al-Biruni and his magnum opus, Al-Quanunu’l—Mas’udi. Oriental Publ. Bureau L-LXXV, 1956.Google Scholar
Bertele, H. v. Precision Timekeeping in the pre-Huygens Era. Horol. J. Land., Dec. 1953.Google Scholar
Bertele, H. v. Jost Burgis Beitrag zur Formentwicklung der Uhren. Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien 51, 169, 1955.Google Scholar
Bertele, H. v. Zur Geschichte der Aquationsuhren-Entwicklung. Bl. Tech-Gesch. 19, 78, 1956.Google Scholar
Bertele, H. v. The Bohemian Clock of the Habsburgian Clock Treasures in Vienna. Antiquarian Horology (London) 11, 41, 1957.Google Scholar
Bertele, H. v. Bassermann-Jordan Uhren. Verl. Klinghardt und Biermann, Braunschweig, 530 pp., 1960.Google Scholar
Boas, M. and Hall, R. Tycho Brahe’s system of the world. Occ. Notes R.A.S. 3, 253, 1959.Google Scholar
Brunner-Traut, E. Die Astronomie der Alter. Aus d. Heimat, Stuttgart 66, 1, 1958.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. La Lune chez les anciens. Bull. Soc. Astr. pop. Toulouse, 49, no. 398, 5, 1958.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. J. Die astronomische Tafeln von Al Khwarismi. Enseign. math. 2, 1, 1956.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. J. Zwei Griechische Ephemeriden. Osiris 13, 79, 1959.Google Scholar
Carmody, F. J. Notes on the Astronomical Work of Thâbit b. Qurra. Isis 46, 235, 1955.Google Scholar
Centenary of Sydney observatory, Austr. J. Sci. 21, no. 2, 31, 1958.Google Scholar
Chapin, S. L. The Astronomical Activities of Nicolas Claude Fabri de Peiresc. Isis 48, 13, 1957.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. Galileo’s fallacy. Isis 49, 344, 1958.Google Scholar
Coulson, T. Godfrey’s invention of the reflecting quadrant. J. Franklin Inst. 266, 327, 1958.Google Scholar
Covington, A. E. An early 19th century star map after Aratus. J.R. astr. Soc. Can. 53, 78, 1959.Google Scholar
Davis, G. The Origin of the Ancient Constellations. Sky and Telesc. 18, 424, 1959.Google Scholar
D’Elia, P. Frammenti di due antiche carte cinesi presso l’Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna. Coelum 26, 41, 1958.Google Scholar
Dermul, A. Catalogues d’étoiles. XII. Bode, Gaz. ast. 40, 1, 1958.Google Scholar
Destombes, M. L’Orient et les catalogues d’étoiles au Moyen Age. Arch. int. Hist. Sci. 35, 339, 1956.Google Scholar
Dick, J. Der Berliner Sternwarte erstes Domizil. Sterne 35, 209, 1959.Google Scholar
Drake, S. Numerous short articles on Galileo, mostly entitled ‘Galileo Gleanings’. Isis, 1957, 1958, 1959.Google Scholar
Drake, S. Galileo Gleanings II: A kind word for Salusbury. Isis 49, 26, 1958.Google Scholar
Drake, S. Galileo Gleanings III: A kind word for Sizzi. Isis 49, 155, 1959.Google Scholar
Drake, S. Galileo Gleanings IV: Bibliographical Notes. Isis 49, 409, 1958.Google Scholar
Drake, S. Galileo’s fallacy. Isis 49, 345, 1958.Google Scholar
Drake, S. The starry messenger. Isis 49, 346, 1958.Google Scholar
Drake, S. Galileo’s first telescopes at Padua and Venice. Isis 50, 245, 1959.Google Scholar
Duarte, J. F. O bacharel mestre Joao, a ceu brasileiro e a estrêla polar do sul. Rev. bras. Geogr. 19, 361, 1957.Google Scholar
Dubs, H. H. The beginnings of Chinese astronomy. J. Amer. orient. Soc., 1958.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. Le système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic. T.8. Paris, Hermann, 512 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Emmot, U. John Theaphilus Desaguliers, Optician 136, 241, 1958.Google Scholar
Evans, M. G. Newton and the cause of gravity. Amer. J. Phys. 26, 619, 1958.Google Scholar
Evans, D. S. The astronomical work of Sir John Herschel at the Cape. Quart. Bull. S. Afric. Libr. 12, 44, 1957.Google Scholar
Evans, D. S. Dashing and dutiful: Herschel and Maclear made a strange if effective team in their astronomical work at the Cape of Good Hope. Science 127, 935, 1958.Google Scholar
Fauth, H. Philipp Fauth and the Moon. Sky and Telesc. 19, 21, 1959.Google Scholar
Fermer, B. Resa i Europa En astronom, industrispion och teaterhabitué genom Danmark, Tyskland, Holland, England, Frankrike och Italien, 1758-62. Uppsala, Almqvist & Wiksells, 572 pp., 1956.Google Scholar
Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. Eine unabhängige Bestätigung der Haufigkeitsfunktion der Sternmassen (Würdigung und neue Auswertung der wohl ältesten Untersuchung zu dieser Thema). Anz. öst. Akad. Wiss. 209, 1953 =Mitt. wien. Sternw. 6, 237.Google Scholar
Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. Maximilian Hell und Piacidus Fixemillner, Bergründer der neueren Astronomie in Österreich. Österreich Naturforscher, Arzte und Techn. 27, 225, 1957.Google Scholar
Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. and Hugo, von Seeliger. Grosse Österreicher 11, 177, Amalthea-Verlag, Wien, 1957.Google Scholar
Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. and Neumann, E. Astronomische und künstgeschichtliche Bedeutung zweier Armillarsphären des Kunsthistorischen Museums in Wien. Mitt. Inst. Österr. Gesch 67, 135.Google Scholar
Fettweiss, E. Astronomical Knowledge of tribes in Africa, America, Australia and Oceania. Scientia, Bologna 94, 279, 1959.Google Scholar
Fettweiss, E. Sternkundliche Kenntnisse in der Legensrührung bei heutigen Naturvölkern. Scientia, Bologna 94, 279, 1959.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, J. O. and Lagar, F. Un Diario di G. V. Schiaparelli. Act. Cong. Int. Hist. Sci. (Florence, 1956), 433, 1958.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, J. O. Die mathematischen und astronomischen Handschriften und Frühdrucke in Basel. Ciba-Festschrift, Basel, 41, 1959.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, J. O. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Barock und Universalismus. Ott-Verl., München, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, J. O. Le problème de la forme de la fusée pour chronomètre dans l’histoire du calcul infinitésimal autour de 1700. Cong. Int. Chronom. 1959, Munich, 1960.Google Scholar
Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. Translated with an Introduction and notes by Drake, S.. N.Y., Doubleday and Co., XI + 302 pp., 1957.Google Scholar
Gaythorpe, S. B. The lunar hand-calendar of Magister Anianus. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 80, 1959.Google Scholar
Geymonat, L. Galileo Galilei. Torino, G. Einaudi, 384 pp., 1957.Google Scholar
Gingerich, O. Abbé Lacaille’s list of clusters and nebulae. Sky and Telesc. 19, 207, 1960.Google Scholar
Gleisberg, B. Richard Carrington (Zur Erinnerung an seine Entdeckung der Zonen Wanderung der Sonnenflecken vor hundert Jahren). Sterne 35, 31, 1959.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. D., Etchecopar, C. A. and Montero, C. P. Primer Observatorio de Montevideo. Montevideo, XXVIII + 148 pp., 1955.Google Scholar
Hacar, B. Johann Georg Palitsch, sedálkastronom. Rise Hvezd 39, 277, 1958.Google Scholar
Hall, A. R. Newton on the calculation of central forces. Ann. Sci. 13/12, 62, 1958.Google Scholar
Hall, A. R. Galileo’s fallacy. Isis 49, 342, 1958.Google Scholar
Edmond, Halley. (1656-1742): papers to commemorate the tercentenary of his birth. Mem. Brit. astr. Ass. 37, no. 3, 39 pp., 1956.Google Scholar
Hogg, A. R. The great Melbourne telescope. Aust. J. Sci. 21, 2, 1958.Google Scholar
Hopmann, J. 200 Jahre Astronomie in Wien. Alm. öst. Akad. Wiss. 445, 1956.Google Scholar
Hopmann, J. Johann Palisa und Johann Holetschek, Planetoiden und Kometenforscher. Österr. Naturforsch., Arzte und Techniker 32, 227, 1957.Google Scholar
Hosotte-Reynaud, M. Identification d’ún des astrolabes de la mosquée des Andalous. Hespéris, Rabat 44, 178, 1957.Google Scholar
Jai, Singh. Isolated astronomer. Cranbrook Inst. Sci. News Letter 27, 46, 1957.Google Scholar
Jankovic, N. Astronomical data in ancient chronicles. Vasiona 6, 38, 1958 (in Serb.).Google Scholar
Jansky, C. M. The Discovery and Identification by Karl Guthe Jansky of electro-magnetic Radiation of extra-terrestrial Origin in the Radio Spectrum. Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs. N. Y. 46, 13, 1958.Google Scholar
Järnefelt, G. J. Tähtitieteellinen Tutkimus Suomessa. (L’histoire de l’astronomie finlandaise), Helsinki, 1960.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Chavez, R. Mithologia astrónómica Nahuatl. Universo, Méx. 13, no. 46, 7, 1959 (in Span.).Google Scholar
Kauffeldt, A. Nikolaus Kopernikus. Der Umsturz d. mittelalterl. Welbildes. Leipzig-Jena, Urania-Verl., 145 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S. A survey of Islamic astronomical tables. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 46, 123, 1956.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S. The Sasanian Astronomical handbook, J. Amer. orient. Soc., 1958.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S. A letter of Janshid al-Kâshi to his father, Orientalia. Comm. Period. Pontif. Inst. Biblici, 1960.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S. and Murunwa, A. Biruni on the Solar Equation. J. Near Eastern Studies, 1958.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. S. and Roberts, V. The planetary Theory of Ibn-al-Shatir. Isis, 1959.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. E. Historical research in astronomy. J.R.A.S., Can. 53, 252, 1959.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. E. and Burland, M. S. A Gregorian telescope. J.R.A.S., Can. 52, 255, 1958.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. B. The planetary theory of Ibn al-Shatir. Isis 50, 227, 1959.Google Scholar
Kepler, J. Gesamte Werke, Bd. 18, Briefe (1620-30). Ed. Dich, and Caspar, , M. München, Beck, 592 pp., 1959.Google Scholar
King, H. C. The planetarium. Endeavour 18, 35, 1959.Google Scholar
King, H. C. The History of the Planetarium. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 4, 1960.Google Scholar
Knox-Shaw, H. The Radcliffe Observatory. Vistas in Astronomy, 1, 144, 1955.Google Scholar
Kotsakis, D. Astronomy and Mathematical Sciences during the Byzantine period (in Greek). Publ. Lab. astr. Univ. Athens, no. 10, 20 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. L’oeuvre astronomique de Kepler. Bull. Soc. d’Etude du XVII-e siècle, no. 30, 69, 1956.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. and Cohen, I. B. Critical and variorum edition of Newton’s ‘Principia’. Isis 49, 81, 1958.Google Scholar
Kunitzsch, P. Arabische Sternnamen in Europa. Verlag Otto Harrassowitz. Wiesbaden, 240 pp., 1959.Google Scholar
Labbé, J. En feuilletant le calendrier des Bhils. Sci. et voyages, no. 151, 59, 1958.Google Scholar
Layton, D. The motion of the planets. Newton’s effect on English thought. History to-day, 7, 288, 1957.Google Scholar
Le Duchat, d’Aubigny. Deux esprits du XVIII-e siècle. Vayringe, P. et Messier, C.. Astronomie 73, 280, 1959.Google Scholar
Leopardi, G. Sugli errori popolari degli antichi. Del Sole. Coelum 27, 76, 1959.Google Scholar
Leopardi, G. Sugli errori popolari degli antichi. Degli astri. Coelum 27, 112, 1959.Google Scholar
Leopardi, G. Sugli errori popolari degli antichi. Dell’astrologia, delle eclissi, delle comete. Coelum 27, 140, 1959.Google Scholar
Link, F. and Linkova, Z. Méthodes astronomiques dans la climatologie historique (Période solaire et climatique de 400 ans). Studia geophys. et geod. 3, 43, 1959.Google Scholar
Löchel, K. Zum Gedenken an Bernhard Schmidt. Sterne 35, 197, 1959.Google Scholar
Longauer, F. Po stopách kultu Mesiaca v Podunajsku. (About the lunar cult to the Danube region). Rise Hvezd 39, 82, 1958.Google Scholar
Luplau-Janssen, A. Lidt astronomi fra Karl den Stores lid. (Astronomy in Charles the Great’s times). Urania 15, 49, 1958 (in Czech).Google Scholar
Mayer, L. A. Islamic astrolabists and their works. Geneva, 123 pp., 1956.Google Scholar
Michel, H. Le plus ancient instrument d’astronomie: Le Pi. Ciel et Terre, no. 5–6, 1959.Google Scholar
Michel, H. Méthodes astronomiques des Hautes époques choises. Confér, du Palais de la Découverte, Paris, 1959.Google Scholar
Milankovitch, M. History of the astronomical science from early time till 1727. Beograd, ‘Scientific book’, 143 pp., 1954.Google Scholar
Miller, M. Aristarch von Samos als Vorläufer des Kopernikus. Wiss. Z., Hochschule Verkehrwesen Dresden, 6, 257, 1958-9.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. Forty years of Czéchò-Slòvák astronomy. Rise Hvezd 39, 217, 1958 (in Czech).Google Scholar
Moore, P. A defence of Schröter. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 363, 1960.Google Scholar
Mougenot, R. L’oeuvre astronomique de Henri Poincaré. Astronomie 73, 279, 1959.Google Scholar
Needham, J. How the Chinese invented the mechanical clock. New Scientist 4, 1481, 1958.Google Scholar
Needham, J. Chinese astronomy and the Jesuit mission: an encounter of cultures. London, China Soc., 24 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Needham, J. The missing link in horological history: a Chinese contribution. Proc. roy. Soc., A, 250, 147, 1959.Google Scholar
Needham, J., Wang, Ling and Price, D. J. Heavenly clockwork. Camb. Univ. Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. The transmission of planetary theories in ancient and medieval astronomy. Scr. math., N. Y. 22, 165, 1957.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. Notes on Al-Kaid. J. Amer. orient. Soc. 1957.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. The astronomical tables P. Lond. 1278. Osiris 13, 93, 1958.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. Studies in Byzantine astronomical terminology. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 50, no. 2, 45 pp., 1960.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. On a fragment of Heliodorus (?) on planetary motions. Sudhoffs Arch. Gesch. Med. und Naturwiss. 42, 237, 1958.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. Regula Philippi Arrhidaei. Isis, 1959.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. The equivalence of eccentric and epicyclic motion according to Apollonius. Scr. math., N.Y. 24, 5, 1959.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A. V. Omkring opdagelsen af Neptun. (On the discovery of Neptun). Nord. astr. Tidsskr., no. 3, 93, 1959.Google Scholar
Nordenmark, N. V. E. Astronomiens historia i Sverige intill ar 1800 (History of astronomy in Sweden before 1800). Uppsala, 295 pp., 1959.Google Scholar
Nørlind, W. On some manuscripts concerning Tycho Brahe. Observatory 78, 73, 1958.Google Scholar
Pecker, J. C. Le Ciel (contains interesting historical review). Encyclopédie Essentielle, Série Science, no. 3, R. Delpire, Paris, 112 pp., 1960.Google Scholar
Pines, S. La théorie de la rotation de la Terre à l’époque d’al Biruni. J. asiat. 244, 301, 1956.Google Scholar
Pingree, D. A Greek linear planetary Text in India. J. Amer. orient. Soc., 1959.Google Scholar
Plakidis, S. Astronomy in Modern Greece. Athens. 59 pp., 1960.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. A medieval footnote to Ptolemaic precession. Vistas in astronomy 1, 66, 1955.Google Scholar
Price, D. J., Wang, Ling and Needham, J. Chinese astronomical clockwork. Nature, Lond. 177, 600, 1956.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. Leonardo da Vinci and the clock of Giovanni di Dondi. Antiq. Horol., June 1958.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. The first scientific instrument of the Renaissance. Physis 1, 26, 1959.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. On the origin of clockwork, perpetual motion devices and the compass. Contr. Mus. Hist. techn. Bui. 218, pap. 6, 81.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. An ancient Greek computer. Sci. Amer., June, 1959.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. Contra-Copernicus: A critical reestimation of the mathematical planetary theory of Ptolemy, Copernicus and Kepler. From Critical problems in the history of science. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1959.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. The Antikythera mechanism, an ancient Greek computer. Yearb. Amer. phil. Soc., 618, 1959.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K. The Athenian Lunar Month. Classical Philology, 1959.Google Scholar
Pulec, M. J. Nejstarši astronomická památka v. Cechách. (The oldest astronomical monument in Czechoslovakia). Rise Hvezd 39, 136, 1958 (in Czech).Google Scholar
Roberts, V. The solar and lunar theory of Ibn ash-Shatir. A pre-Copernican copernican model. Isis 48, 428, 1957.Google Scholar
Rosen, E. Was Maurolico’s Essay on the Nova of 1572 Printed? Isis 48, 171, 1957.Google Scholar
Rosen, E. Galileo’s misstatements about Copernicus. Isis 49, 319, 1958.Google Scholar
Rosen, E. Articles about Galileo. Isis, 1957, 1958.Google Scholar
Rosen, E. Three Copernican Treatises. Dover Reprint. 1959.Google Scholar
Sauvenier-Coffin, E. Une page de l’enseignement des sciences exactes dans l’ancien pays de Liège: le Tractatus de horologiis du Père Linus. Bull. Soc. Sci. Liège 27, 280, 1958.Google Scholar
Sayili, A. The introductory section of Habash’s astronomical tables known as the ‘Damascene’ Zij. Ankara Univ. Cografya Fakultes; Dergisi XIII, Cilt 4, 133, 1955.Google Scholar
Sayili, A. Al Khazini’s treatise on astronomical instruments. Ankara Univ. 14, 1, 1956.Google Scholar
Sayili, A. Ghiyâth al Din’s Letter on Ulugh Bey and the scientific Activity in Samarquand. Turkish Historical Society. Ankara, 115 pp., 1960.Google Scholar
Sayili, A. The observatory in Islam. Turkish Historical Society. Ankara, 472 pp. 1960.Google Scholar
Schröder, , Wilfried, . Die astronomischen Sammlungen in Reichsmuseum für die Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften in Leiden. Sterne 35, 236, 1959.Google Scholar
Shapley, H. Of stars and men. The human response to an expanding universe. Boston Beacon Press, 157 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Shapley, H. On the astronomical high lights of a half century. Irish astr. J. 5, 190, 1959.Google Scholar
Smith, E. B. Jean-Sylvain Bailly, astronomer, mystic, revolutionary, 1736-93. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 44, 427, 1954.Google Scholar
Stebbins, F. A. A roman sundial. J. R. astr. Soc. Can. 52, 250, 1958.Google Scholar
Stebbins, F. A. A sixteenth century planetarium. J. R. astr. Soc. Can. 53, 197, 1959.Google Scholar
Stone, A. P. Astronomical instruments at Calcutta, Delhi, and Jaipur. Arch. int. Hist. Sci. 11, 159, 1958.Google Scholar
Struve, O. About a Russian Astronomer (B. P. Gerasimovich). Sky and Telesc. 16, 379, 1957.Google Scholar
Struve, O. Henri Poincaré and his cosmogonical studies. Sky and Telesc. 17, 226, 1958.Google Scholar
Struve, O. G. A. Shajn and Russian Astronomy. Sky and Telesc. 17, 272, 1958.Google Scholar
Talgeri, K. M. Jai Singh and his observatory at New Delhi. Sky and Telesc. 18, 70, 1958.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. G. R. The Earth but a satellite of the Sun. (Interesting history of the statement of the heliocentric conception in England). J. Inst. Navig. 11, 150, 1958.Google Scholar
Teucher, A. Palitzsch und der Halleysche Komet. Wissen und Leben 4, 224, 1959.Google Scholar
The correspondence of Isaac Newton, vol. 1. Ed. Turnbull, H. W. and Scott, S. F., Cambridge Univ. Press, 468 pp., 1960.Google Scholar
Thomson, S. H. Trosseteste’s Questio de Calore, de Cometis, and de Operacionibus Solis. Medievalia et Humanística, 1957.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L. Some tracts on comets, 1456-1500. Arch. int. Hist. Sci. 11, 225, 1958.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L. Notes upon some medieval astronomical, astrological and mathematical manuscripts at Florence, Milan, Bologna and Venice. Isis 50, 33, 1959.Google Scholar
Tombaugh, C. W. Reminiscences of the Discovery of Pluto. Sky and Telesc. 19, 364, 1960.Google Scholar
Una astronomia del siglo VII por San Isidoro de Seville. Urania (Madrid) 42, 237, 1957 (in Spain.).Google Scholar
Ungerer, T., Ungerer, Sh. and Leclerc, L. L’horloge astronomique de la cathédrale de Strasbourg, historique, description, fonctionnement. Strasbourg, Roux, 10th edition, ill., 48 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H. C. ‘Zonnewervels’ een jubileum. Hemel en Dampkring 56, 16, 1958.Google Scholar
van der Waerden, B. L. Babylonische Planetenrechnung in Agypten und Indien. Bibl. Orientalis, 13, 108, 1956.Google Scholar
van der Waerden, B. L. Babylonische Planetenrechnung. Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 102, 39, 1957.Google Scholar
van der Waerden, B. L. Die Handlichen Tafeln des Ptolemaios. Osiris 13, 54, 1959.Google Scholar
van der Waerden, B. L. Babylonische Methoden in ägyptischen Planetentafeln. Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 105, 97, 1960.Google Scholar
van der Waerden, B. L. The astronomical papyrus Ryland 27. Centaurus 5, 177, 1958.Google Scholar
van der Waerden, B. L. Drei umstrittene Mondfinsternisse bei Ptolemaios. Museum Helveticum XV, 106, 1958.Google Scholar
Vincent, M. Le mystère de la découverte de Neptune par Leverrier. Paris, Fischbacher, 35 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
West, M. L. Anaxagoras and the meteorite of 467 B.C. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 368, 1960.Google Scholar
Wihters, , Don, . Time through the ages. Mich. Technic. 76, no. 7, 24, 66, 1958.Google Scholar
Wisner, A. Astronomische und mathematische Instrumente im Deutschen Museum zu München. Sudhoffs Arch. Gesch. Med. und Naturmss., 42, 227, 1958.Google Scholar
Wolf, H. The solar parallax and the growth of international scientific cooperation in the 18th century. Act. Cong. Int. Hist. Sci. (Florence, 1956), 373, 1958.Google Scholar
Woolf, , Harry, . The Transits of Venus; a Study of 18th Century Science. Princeton Univ. Press, ill., XIII + 258 pp., 1959.Google Scholar
Wünschmann, F. Die alte Berliner Sternwarte um 1800 unter Johann Eiert Bode. Mber. dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 2, 250, 1960.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Astronomische Instrumente der christlichen Völker Europas un 10-11. Jahrhundert. Miscelánea de Estudos a Joaquim de Carvalho 4, 356, 1960.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. El mundo de las estrellas. Barcelona, Ed. Herder, , 202 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Neue Forschungen über der Sternenmantel Kaiser Heinrich II. Ein angeblicher Brief des N. Copernicus. Ber. naturf. Ges. Bamberg 36, 1, 1958.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Eine merkwürdige gotische Standuhr. Die Uhr 12, no. 9, 18, 1958.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Die Augsburger Uhrmacherei von 1550 bis 1650. Neue Uhrmacher-Zeitung 12, no. 16, 27, 1958.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Die Uhr und das Pendel. Die Uhr 12, no. 18, 31, 1958.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Alte Uhren in Russland. Die Uhr 13, no. 2, 26, 1959.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Astronomiegeschichtliche Forschungen in Moskau und Leningrad. Forsch. Fortschr. dtsch. Wiss. 33, 104, 1959.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Clocks in Russian Museums. Antiq. Horol. 2, 206, 1959.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Wissenschaftliche Instrumente. Alte Uhren. Kaysers Kunst-und Antiquitätenbuch, 2, 39, 1959.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Astronomia e astrologia, Encicl. Univ. dell’ Arte 2, 118, 1958.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Cosmografia e cosmologia, Encicl. Univ. de Arte 3, 496, 1959.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Nürnbergs wissenschaftliche Bedeutung am Ende des Mittelalters. Mitt. Ver. Gesch. Stadt Nürnberg 50, 113, 1960.Google Scholar
Zinner, E. Forschungen in Spanien und Portugal. Die Bücher Regiomontans in Spanien. Die magnetische Vermessung einiger westgotischer Kirchen in Spanien. Der Sternhimmel mit den Planetenherrschen. Uber die niederländische Astronomie am Erde des Mittelalters. Europäische Sonnenuhren. Alte Masse an Kirchen und Rathäusern. Bern. naturf. Ges. Bamberg 37, 1960.Google Scholar
Go, Tsin-Chung. The origin of the doctrine on 28 signs of the Lunar Zodiac. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Issue 4, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 55 (in Russian), 1957.Google Scholar
Liu-Sien-Chjou, . On the invention of the devices for the measurings of the time. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Issue 4, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 105 (in Russian), 1957.Google Scholar
Hsi Zze-Tsung, . On the theory Gai-Tien and the theory Huan-tien. Acta astr. Sinica 8, 80, 1960. (Resumé in English).Google Scholar
Tang, Ju-chwan. Discussions on some problems concerning the Gai-tien theory as interpreted in Professor Chen Tsun-Kwai’s ‘A concise history of ancient Chinese Astronomy’. Acta astr. Sinica 5, no. 2, 292 (Resumé in English), 1957.Google Scholar
Tsien, Pao-tsung. On calendar system ‘Chou-Chi’, created by Go Chou-Tsin. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Issue 5, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 164, (in Russian), 1957.Google Scholar
Ameisenowa, Z. Globe of Martin Bylica from Olkusha and the map of the sky in the East and in the West. Wroclaw Zaklad Narodowy im. Ossolinskich. 55 pp., tabl. 46, 1959.Google Scholar
Baranowski, H. Copernic Bibliography of 1509-1955. Warszawa Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 449 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Barycz, H. La participation de la Pologne dans les études sur le texte ‘De Revolutionibus’ de Nicolas Copernic. Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, Special issue, 123, 1957-8.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, A. Andrzej Grzymala from Poznan—an astronomer and a physician of the 15th century. Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki 3, 409, 1958.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, A. Was Khilary from Wislica a fighter for the heliocentric system in Krakow? Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, no. 3, 419, 1959.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, A. Was Leovitus an opponent of Copernic? Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, no. 1, 19, 1959.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, A. Working plan on the history of astronomy in Poland. Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z.2, 7, 1959.Google Scholar
Gansiniec, R. The title of the astronomical work by Nicholas Copernic. Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, no. 1, 195, 1958.Google Scholar
Huber, P. Ueber den Nullpunkt der babylonischen Ekliptik. Centaurus 5, 192, 1958.Google Scholar
Kamienski, M. Comet Halley in 1163 BC and the fall of Troy. Acta astr., Cracoviae 8, no. 2, 62, 1958.Google Scholar
Kamienski, M. Fifty years of the research of the comet P/Wolf I. Postepy Astronomii, z.4,. 283, 1959.Google Scholar
Kamienski, M. An essay on the history of the Warsaw Observatory 1815-1945. Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z.2, 69, 1959.Google Scholar
Kamienski, M. Halley’s comet in the time of Hammurabi, J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 304, 1960.Google Scholar
Kamienski, M. Unknown comet about 2008 B.C. was probably Halley’s comet. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 314, 1960.Google Scholar
Kepinski, F. The Institute and the Astronomical observatory of the Warsaw Polytechnica School (1925-55). Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej, Seria C, z.2, 1117, 1959.Google Scholar
Koziel, K. Theory on physical libration of the Moon in the 20th century. Postepy Astronomii z. 2, 101, 1960.Google Scholar
Orlowski, B. The end of the legend about Copernic-engineer. Problemy, no. 8, 600, 1960.Google Scholar
Przypkowski, T. Astronomy in Kalish. 18th century of Kalish. Scientific works and materials on the history of Kalish and Kalish region. T. I. Kalisz, Wydawnictwo Poznanskie, 155, 1960.Google Scholar
Przypkowski, T. The largest solar clock in Europe. Problemy, no. 4, 254, 1960.Google Scholar
Przypkowski, T. Experimental table of Nicholas Copernic in Olshtyn in the light of modern discoveries of 1956-57. Summary on the paper. Postepy Astronomii, z. 3, 107, 1958.Google Scholar
Rybka, E. A short essay on the history of astronomy in Lvov. Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z. 2, 53, 1959.Google Scholar
Rybka, E. From the history of Krakow astronomy. Problemy, no. 9, 641, 1960.Google Scholar
Rybka, E. Wincenty Wisniewski (1781-1855)—a forgotten astronomer. Problemy, no. 7, 529, 1960.Google Scholar
Stolyhwo, K. Memoirs on the first period of scientific and pedagogical activity of Tadeusz Banachiewicz in astronomy. Postepy Astronomii, z. 1, 67, 1960.Google Scholar
Dziewulski, W. The history of St. Batory’s observatory in Vilno (1919-19). Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z. 2, 29, 1959.Google Scholar
Arlazorov, M.S. Konstantin Eduardovitch Ziolkovsky. His life and activity. 2nd ed. with corrections and supplements. State Publ. house of technical literature, 144 pp., 1957 (Gostechizdat).Google Scholar
Aksentjeva, Z.N. Studies in the Poltava gravimetrical observatory of the Ukrainian Academy of sciences from Dec. 1, 1955 to May 1, 1958. Trans. 14th U.S.S.R. Conf. Astron., Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Moscow-Leningrad, 51.Google Scholar
Ventzel, M.K. Astronomy in the Moscow Geodetic Institute (from the history of the native practical field astronomy) Trans. Moscow Inst. eng. Geodesy, aerophotography and cartography, no. 35, 67, 1959.Google Scholar
Vorobjev, B.N. From K. E. Ziolkovsky’s correspondence (from K. E. Ziolkovsky’s funds in Archives of the U.S.S.R. Acad. of sciences), Questions Hist. natural Sci. Tech., no. 6, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 46, 1958.Google Scholar
Vorobjev, B.N. K. E. Ziolkovsky’s early studies in interplanetary communiciations. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. no. 6, Moscow, Acad Sci. U.S.S.R. 30, 1958.Google Scholar
Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B.A. Astronomy (in XVIII c.) Hist. nat. Sci. in Russia 1, part 1, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 296, 1957.Google Scholar
Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B.A. Astronomy (first half of 14th century) Ibid, part 2, 104.Google Scholar
Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B.A. Astronomy (before the XVIII c.) Hist. nat. Sci. in Russia. 1, part 1. Moscow, U.S.S.R. Acad. Sci. 49, 1957.Google Scholar
Vuuk, A. On astronomical observations in North Estonia in XIII c Tartu Obs. Calendar 1960 (in Estonian).Google Scholar
Djalialov, G.D. Gijas ad-Din Djemshid Chusti (Kashi)—the most eminent astronomer and mathematician of 15th century. Mem. (Utchenye Zapisky) Tashkent state pedagogic Inst., 1957 no. 7, 14, 1959.Google Scholar
Evgenjev, I. and Kuznetzova, L.M. In search of the fire stone. A sketch about Kulik, L. A., the initiator of Soviet meteoritics. Geographical publishing house, 213 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Zhelnin, G.A. and Miursepp, P.V. Material monuments of W. Struve’s scientific activity in Tartu astronomical obs. in the period from 1812 to 1839. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. (Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.) 17, 473, 1957.Google Scholar
Ziegel, F.J. Fedor Alexandrovitch Bredikhin. His life and activity. State technical publishing house (Gostechizdat), 152 pp., 1957.Google Scholar
Hist. nat. Sci. in Russia; Ed. Figurovsky, N. A.. vol. 1, part I. The development of natural sciences in Russia before 1800 and in 18th century. Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 1957, 495 pp., 1957. Part 2. Development of natural sciences in Russia in the first half of the 19th century., Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 380 pp., 1957.Google Scholar
History of the physical and mathematical sciences. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 19, 723 pp., 1957.Google Scholar
Karimov, M.G. Academician Vasilij Grigorjevitch Fesenkov. Vestnik Kazakh. Acad. Sci. 1, 89, 1959.Google Scholar
Korytnikov, S.N. About the first Simonovsky observatory of the Kazan University. Mem. (Utchenye Zapisky) Kazan Univ. 117, 181, 1957.Google Scholar
Korytnikov, S.N. About a forgotten name in the history of native astronomy (A. A. Bugrov). Mem. Kazan Univ. 117, 177, 1957.Google Scholar
Krivtzov, V.A. Cosmogonical treatise of 11th century. Questions of Philosophy, no. 12, 106, 1958.Google Scholar
Kulikovsky, P.G. History of astronomy. In the symposium Astronomy in the U.S.S.R. for 40 years , Moscow, 365, 1960.Google Scholar
Mamedbeili, G.D. Nasireddin Tusi Muhamed (Astronomer and mathematician of Azerbaidjan, 1201-74). Baku, 154 (in Azerb.), 1957.Google Scholar
Mamedbeili, G.D. Astronomical instruments of Maraga observatory. Trans. astrophys., Azerbaidjan Acad. Sci. 1, 84, 1959.Google Scholar
Melnikov, O.A. Fedor Alexandrovitch Bredikhin (To the 125-anniversary since his birthday) Pulkovo Bull. 20, no. 6, 1, 1958.Google Scholar
Melnikov, O.A. Josef Fraunhoffer (1787-1826). Trans. Inst. nat. Sci. Tech. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 22, 114, 1959.Google Scholar
Nevskaya, N.I. Scientific relations of F. A. Bredikhin with the eminent Russian scientists of the last quarter of 19th century. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 28, 464, 1959.Google Scholar
Pavlov, N.N. On W. Struve’s views of the question on the estimation of the precision of the interpolation and extrapolation of clock corrections. Trans. All-Union Inst. Phys. Tech. & Radiotech. Measurements no. 1, 13, 1958.Google Scholar
Perel, J.G. Evolution of the ideas on the Universe. Moscow, Publ. House of Phys. and Math. Literature, 352 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Perel, J.G. Problems of the history of astronomy at the conference on the history of natural sciences and technics. Astr. J. Moscow 36, 975, 1959.Google Scholar
Prudnikov, V.E. On the question about P. L. Tchebyshev’s studies on astronomy. Historico-Mathematical Investigations, Issue 10, State Technical & Theoretical Publishing House (Gostechteoretizdat) 639, 1957.Google Scholar
Rzaev, N. Method of conversion of the lunar system of chronology into the solar. Dokl. Azerbaidjan Acad. Sci. 4, 339, 1958 (in Azerb., summary in Russian).Google Scholar
Rijves, V.G. Development of astronomy in Estonia. Nature of Estonia, no. 4, 1960 (in Estonian).Google Scholar
Romanova, N.S. K.E. Ziolkovski’s documents in the Moscow section of the Archives of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech., issue 6, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 50, 1958.Google Scholar
Sabaev, V.P. To the question on the history of astronomical azimuth determinations. Bull. higher schools Geod. Aerophotog. no. 6, 45, 1959.Google Scholar
Selikhanovitch, V.G. Aleksei Nikolaevitch Savitch. Mathematician, astronomer, teacher (1810-83). (Sketch of the life and activity in science and teaching). Moscow, State Geodesy Publ. House (Geodezizdat), 77 pp., 1957.Google Scholar
Seleshnikov, S.I. History of Calendar and its forthcoming reform. Leningrad, Publishing House (Lenizdat), 71 pp., 1959.Google Scholar
Seleshnikov, S.I. History of modern calendar. To its forthcoming reform. Leningrad, ill. 54 pp., 1958.Google Scholar
Slonim, J.M. Development of solar investigations in Tashkent astronomical observatory for 75 years (1874-1949). Trans. (Trudy) Tashkent Obs. 6, 37, 1957.Google Scholar
Sokolova, N.V. The diary of observations by A. D. Krasilnikov and N. G. Kurganov of Venus passage over the disk of the Sun on 26 May, 1761. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. (Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.) 19, 619, 1957.Google Scholar
Sokolsky, V.N. Konstantine Eduardovitch Ziolkovsky. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. issue 6, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 24, 1958.Google Scholar
Subbotin, M.F. Astronomical studies of Leonard Euler. In coll. of papers: Leonard Euler. To the 250th anniversary since his birthday. Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 268, 1958 (summary in German).Google Scholar
Subbotin, M.F. Leonard Euler and the astronomical problems of his times. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. issue 7, Moscow, Acad. of Sciences U.S.S.R., 58, 1959.Google Scholar
Three pioneers in astronautics. 2. Ziolkovsky, K. E. (an autobiography) Astronautics, 4, no. 5, 48, 63, 1959.Google Scholar
Tchenakal, V.L. Euler and Lomonosov (to the history of their scientific relation). In coll. of papers: Leonard Euler. To the 250th anniversary since his birthday, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 423, 1958.Google Scholar
Shajn, G.A. Lebedev and Astrophysics. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. 28, 66, 1959.Google Scholar
Sharonov, V.V. Lomonosov as an organizer in Russia of observations of the transit of Venus over the disk of the Sun in 1761 and his discovery of the atmosphere of Venus. In coll. of papers and materials M. V. Lomonosov, 4, 1960.Google Scholar
Shibanov, F.A. The pioneer of Russian field astronomy A.D. Krassilnikov. Mem. (Utchenye Zapisky) Leningr. State Univ., no. 226, 21, 1958.Google Scholar
Shcheglov, V.P. Tchardzhui international latitude station. Astr. J. Moscow, 34, 664, 1957.Google Scholar
Shcheglov, V.P. The Kitab international latitude station, Nature (Priroda), no. 11, 46, 1958.Google Scholar
Shcheglov, V.P. Astronomical investigations in the Uzbekh S.S.R. for 40 years (1917-57). Trans. Tashkent astr. Obs. 6, 5, 1957.Google Scholar
Astapovich, I.S. Radiants of meteor streams according to the observations in China in the first thousand years of A.D. Questions of Cosmogony 7, 167, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 1960.Google Scholar
Erpylev, N.P. Development of stellar Astronomy in Russia in 19th century, 13-349.Google Scholar
Tchenakal, V.L. Herschel’s Mirror Telescopes in Russia, 253-340.Google Scholar
Dingle, H. Edmond Halley. His Times and Ours, 341-66.Google Scholar
Chen, Tsun-ven. Astronomy in China, 367-80.Google Scholar
Djalalov, G.D. Remarkable statements of Astronomers belonging to the Samarkand school, 380-6.Google Scholar
Jakhontova, N.S. Naum Ilyich Idelson, 387-406.Google Scholar
Korytnikov, S.N. Works by N. I. Idelson on the history of Astronomy, 407-32.Google Scholar
Idelson, N.I. Urbain Le Verrier, 433-52.Google Scholar
Tchudovitcheva, N.A. Astronomical works of V. P. Engelhardt (comments by Korytnikov, S. W.), 453-66.Google Scholar
Rabinovitch, I.M. Problems of celestial mechanics in the works of P. G. Bole, 467-80.Google Scholar
Dobrovolsky, V.A. The part played by the first Directors of the Pulkovo Observatory in the organization of the Kiev Observatory, 481-90.Google Scholar
Novokshanova, L.K. Astronomical Observatory in the military topography department of the General Staff, 491-8.Google Scholar
Kharadze, E.K. and Kotchlashvili, T.A. On the study of the history of astronomical knowledge in Georgia (Preliminary information), 499-508.Google Scholar
Letters by Gedeonov, D. D. to Witkowsky, W. W.. Comments by V. P. Shcheglov, 509-72.Google Scholar
Cerasky, V.K. Note about the Moscow observatory, 573-9.Google Scholar
Annotated References to selected works on the history of Astronomy published in 1956 and 1957 (Perel, J. G.).Google Scholar
Tchenakal, V.L. James Short and Russian Astronomy, 11-82.Google Scholar
Lavrova, N.B. Sketches on the history of the astronomical bibliography, 83-196.Google Scholar
Perel, J.G. Humboldťs ‘Cosmos’ and its role in the evolution of the ideas on the structure of the Universe, 197-222.Google Scholar
Dobrovolsky, I.G. and Brabitch, V.M. Antonius Pius coins of Alexandria, 223-30.Google Scholar
Tumanian, B.E. Ancient Armenian astrolabe of the XVII century, 231-248.Google Scholar
Nabokov, M.E. ‘Cosmograph’ by A. G. Obodovsky, 249-56.Google Scholar
Shibanov, F.A. A.F. Golubev—talented Russian cartographer and mathematician of the middle of the 19th century, 257-70.Google Scholar
Correspondence of L. Euler and T. Meyer. Published by Kopelevitch, J. H., 271-444.Google Scholar
Baikov, A.A. Pulkovo Observatory in 1901-7, 445-6.Google Scholar
Selected bibliography of the literature on the history of astronomy, issued in the U.S.S.R. and other countries in 1957 and 1958 (Perel, J. G.), 457-62.Google Scholar
Kulikovsky, P.G. On some problems of studying the history of astronomy, 13-28.Google Scholar
Veselovsky, I.N. The origin of Copernicus ‘De Revolutionibus’, 29-53.Google Scholar
Tchenakal, V.L. The astronomical instruments of D. Bird in Russia in the 18th century, 54-120.Google Scholar
Denisov, A.P. N.G. Kurganov—outstanding 18th century Russian astronomer, 121-93.Google Scholar
Rabinovich, I.M. and Apinis, A.A. On the history of the heliocentric theory in Latvia, 194-211.Google Scholar
Perel, J.G. and Radovsky, M.I. From the history of the scientific relations between Russian and American astronomers, 211-50.Google Scholar
Gaposhkin, S. When did Newton discover the law of universal gravitation? 251-5.Google Scholar
Tumanian, B.E. Lunar index, 256-62.Google Scholar
Klado, T. N. From the history of observations of changes on the Moon, 263-78.Google Scholar
Maistrov, L. Je. and Prosvirkina, S.K. Russian wooden calendars, 279-300.Google Scholar
Oresme, N. Mathematical-astronomical treatise. Introduction by V. P. Subov, 301-400.Google Scholar
Letters of W. Struve to S. S. Uvarov and P. N. Fuss. Publication by Kulikovsky, P. G., 401-16.Google Scholar
Selected bibliography of literature on the history of astronomy published in the U.S.S.R. and other countries in 1957-9 (Perel, J. G.), 417-20.Google Scholar
Ebizawa, A. Researches on the traditions of Portuguese studies in Japan (monograph), 1958.Google Scholar
Hirose, H. On the early determinations of longitude in Japan. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai (Dutch studies) no. 39, 1959.Google Scholar
Hirose, H. Bronze celestial globe, made by Yasui Harumi (Astronomer of 17th century) Tenmon Sôhô 13, 1959.Google Scholar
Hirose, H. On the theory of earth’s revolution among the astronomers of Yedo period. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 60, 1960.Google Scholar
Imai, I. On the Tabula Climatum in the Nigi—Ryakusetu. Nippon Tenmon Kenkyûkai Hôbun, 2, 1958.Google Scholar
Imai, I. Celestial globes described in the Kômô Tenti Nizu-Zeisetu, Tenmon Sôhô, 13, 1959.Google Scholar
Imai, I. On the celestial and terrestial globes reserved in Matuura Historical Museum, Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 62, 1960.Google Scholar
Imoto, S. and Hasegawa, I. Historical records of meteor showers in China, Korea and Japan. Smithson. Contr. Astrophys. 2, no. 6, 1958.Google Scholar
Yabuuti, K. Researches on the Shih Shên’s star catalogue related to the astronomical instruments of the Han Dynasty. Tôhô Gakuhô, no. 30, 1959.Google Scholar
Kanda, S. Bibliography of astronomical books written by European learning in Yedo period. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 57, 1960.Google Scholar
Maeyama, Z. L’astronomie of La Lande and the astronomical tables of Kansei and Tenpô. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 39, 1959.Google Scholar
Maeyama, L. Dutch studies of Takahasi Yositoki, an astronomer of Yedo period. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 60, 1960.Google Scholar
Mita, H. Kant’s cosmogony and atomic theory. Kobe Univ. Rep., 1959.Google Scholar
Saegusa, H. Sir Isaac Newton in past two centuries of Japan. Yokohama Univ. Rep. 10, 1958.Google Scholar
Mitsumoto, J. The History of Astronomy in Japan for the last 100 Years. (The history of modern science for the last 100 years). Sidzen 13, no. 1, 88, 1958.Google Scholar
Aiton, E.J. The Vortex Theory of the Planetary Motions.Google Scholar
Aiton, E.J. I. Ann. Sci. 13, 249-64, 1957.Google Scholar
Aiton, E.J. II. Ann. Sci. 14, 132-47, 1958.Google Scholar
Aiton, E.J. III. Ann. Sci. 14, 157-72, 1958.Google Scholar
Andrade, E.N. da C. Doppler and the Doppler Effect. Endeavour 18, 14-9, 1959.Google Scholar
Armitage, A. William Ball, F.R.S. (1627-90). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 167-72, 1960.Google Scholar
Blackwell, D.E. The Zodiacal Light and its Interpretation. Endeavour 19, 14-9, 1960.Google Scholar
Botley, C.M. Two Cometary Centenaries. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 68, 322-4, 1958.Google Scholar
Botley, C.M. The Discovery of Sirius B. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 177, 1959.Google Scholar
Botley, C.M. Dates to Remember. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 220-22, 1959.Google Scholar
Botley, C.M. Aurorae seen in Daylight. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 222-6, 1959.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J. An Eighteenth Century Discussion of Algol. Observatory 77, 191-7, 1957.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J. A Clock Paradox—1794 Style. Observatory 78, 126-7, 1958.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J. Flamsteed and Halley. Oce. Notes R. astr. Soc. 3, no. 20, 211-21, 1958.Google Scholar
Faulkner, R.O. Meteors in Ancient Egypt. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 68, 216-7, 1958.Google Scholar
Heath, T. Aristarchus of Samos. Reprinted. (Oxford, 1959).Google Scholar
Heathcote, N.H. de V. and Armitage, A. The First International Polar Year (1882-3). Pp. 6-100—French translation pp. 105-203—of Annals of the International Geophysical Year 1, 1959).Google Scholar
Hoskin, M. William Herschel. (London, Sheed & Ward, 1959).Google Scholar
Josten, C.H. Elias Ashmole, F.R.S. (1617-92). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 221-30, 1960.Google Scholar
Laurie, P.S. The Greenwich Time Ball. Observatory 78, 113-15, 1958 (See also Observatory 78, 212, 1958).Google Scholar
Laurie, P.S. The Buildings and Old Instruments of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. Observatory 80, 13–22, 1960.Google Scholar
Needham, J. Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 3: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. (Cambridge, 1959).Google Scholar
Ronan, C.A. Laurence Rooke (1622-62). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 113-18, 1960.Google Scholar
Ronan, C. A. and Hartley, H. SirPaul Neile, F.R.S. (1613-86). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 159-65, 1960.Google Scholar
Schove, D.J. and Ho, P.Y. Chinese Aurorae: I, A.D. 1048-70. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 295–304, 1959.Google Scholar
Steavenson, W.H. The Instruments of Sir William Herschel. MNRAS 119, 449-54, 1959.Google Scholar
Tebbutt, C.F. John Wheatley. Observatory 78, 19–20, 1958.Google Scholar