Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T05:36:39.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using technology to understand how therapist variables are associated with clinical outcomes in IAPT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2020

S.E. Bateup Open the ORCID record for S.E. Bateup [Opens in a new window] ,
C.R. Palmer  and
A. Catarino
S.E. Bateup*
Affiliation:
Ieso Digital Health, Cambridge, UK
C.R. Palmer
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Medical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
A. Catarino
Affiliation:
Ieso Digital Health, Cambridge, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The UK’s Improving Access to Psychological Therapy Programme (IAPT) has improved transparency of primary mental health care in relation to the mandatory reporting of clinical outcomes. However, the data reveal a significant variance in outcomes. These findings have led to a growing body of research investigating to what extent therapist variables account for the difference in clinical outcomes. Previous studies have not had access to sufficient recordings or transcripts of therapy sessions in order to fully address this question. The purpose of this study was to use therapy transcripts derived from internet enabled cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) treatment sessions in order to investigate whether and how therapist variables are associated with clinical outcome. A hierarchical log-linear analysis examined the relationship between therapist/patient variables and clinical outcome. Therapist fidelity to the CBT model and associated adherence to an evidence-based protocol were significantly related to clinical outcome. A graphical representation of the statistical model suggests that patient recovery is directly linked with fidelity and indirectly with adherence, after adjusting for patient attributes of age, gender and clinical presentation. Corroborating previous research, therapist competence and adherence to an evidence-based treatment protocol appear to be important in improving outcomes. These findings have implications for the continuing professional development of qualified therapists, potentially reinforcing the importance of reducing therapist drift.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To develop an understanding in relation to which therapist variables are associated with clinical outcome in IAPT.

  2. (2) To reflect on how fidelity to the CBT model and adherence to evidence-based treatment protocols may affect clinical outcomes.

  3. (3) To exemplify use of a statistical method for enhanced visual understanding of complex multi-factorial data.

Keywords

CBTcompetencyIAPToutcometherapist variables
Type
Original Research
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 13 , 2020 , e26
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Current address: 24 Bullen Close, Cambridge CB1 8YU, UK

References

Further reading

Castonguay, L. G., & Hill, E. (2017). Why and How are Some Therapists Better Than Others: Understanding Therapist Effects. Washington DC, USA: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, G., & Turner, H. (2016). Therapist drift-redux: why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 77, 129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Baldwin, S. A., & Imel, Z. E. (2013). Therapist effects: findings and methods in Lambert, M. J. (ed), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change (pp. 258–297) New York, USA: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000034-002Google Scholar
Bateup, S. E. (2018). Virtual therapy: the provision of psychological interventions via the internet. Healthcare and Psychotherapy Journal. Available at: https://www.bacp.co.uk/bacp-journals/healthcare-counselling-and-psychotherapy-journal/july-2018/ (accessed 20 December 2019).Google Scholar
Blackburn, I. M., James, I. A., Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Standart, S., Garland, A., & Reichelt, F. K. (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTS-R): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 291, 431–446. doi: 10.1017/S1352465801004040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branson, A., Shafran, R., & Myles, P. (2015). Investigating the relationship between competence and patient outcome with CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 68, 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosan, L., Reynolds, S., & Moore, R. G. (2006). Factors associated with competence in cognitive therapists. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 179–190. doi: 10.1017/S1352465806003304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castonguay, L. G., Eubanks, C. F., Goldfried, M. R., Muran, J., & Lutz, W. (2015). Research on psychotherapy integration: building on the past, looking to the future. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 365–382. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1014010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catarino, A., Bateup, S.E., Tablan, V., Innes, K., Freer, S., Richards, A., et al. (2018). Demographic and clinical predictors of response to internet-enabled cognitive behavioural therapy: a large-scale outcomes study. BJPsych Open, 4, 411–418. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. (2011). Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. International Review of Psychiatry, 3, 318–327. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. (2018). Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14, 159–183. Available at: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084833 (accessed 28 May 2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, B. J., Farrell, N. R., Kemp, J. J., Dixon, L. J., Sy, J. T., Zhang, A. R., et al. (2013). Assessing therapist reservations about exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: the therapist beliefs about exposure scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 772–780. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.04.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everitt, B. S. (1992). The Analysis of Contingency Tables. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewbank, M. P., Cummins, R., Tablan, V., Bateup, S., Catarino, A., Martin, A. J., & Blackwell, A. D. (2019). Quantifying the association between psychotherapy content and clinical outcomes using deep learning. JAMA Psychiatry. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2748757 (accessed 8 November 2019). doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2664Google ScholarPubMed
Ginzburg, D. M., Bohn, C., Hofling, V., Weck, F., Clark, D., & Stangier, U. (2012). Treatment specific competence predicts outcome in cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 747–752. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyani, A., Shafran, R., Layard, R., & Clark, D. M. (2013). Enhancing recovery rates: lessons from year one of IAPT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 597–606. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haug, T., Nordgreen, T., Ost, L. G., Tangen, T., Kvale, G., Hovland, O. J., Heiervang, E. R., & Havik, O. E. (2016). Working alliance and competence as predictors of outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety and panic disorder in adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 77, 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmy, A., Timofeev, I., Palmer, C. R., Gore, A., Menon, D. K., & Hutchinson, P. J. (2010). Hierarchical log linear analysis of blood parameters and clinical outcome following traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochirurgica, 152, 953–957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huppert, J. D., Bufka, L. F., DeRubeis, D. H., Gorman, J. M., Shear, M. K., & Woods, S. W. (2001). Therapists, therapist variables and cognitive behavioural therapy outcome in a multicentre trial for panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.5.747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, R. G., Barkham, M., Kellett, S., & Saxon, D. (2019). A systematic review of therapist effects: a critical narrative update and refinement to Baldwin and Immel’s (2013) review. Clinical Psychology Review, 67, 78–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazantis, N., Clayton, X., Cronin, T. J., Farchione, D., Limburg, K., & Dobson, K. S. (2018). The Cognitive Therapy Scale and Cognitive Therapy Scale-Revised as measures of therapist competence in cognitive behavior therapy for depression: relations with short and long-term outcome. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, D., Lewis, G., Kaur, S., Wiles, N., King, M., Weich, S., Sharp, D.J., Araya, R., Hollinghurst, S., & Peters, T. (2009). Therapist-delivered internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 374, 628–634. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61257-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure, Journal of General Internal Medication, 16, 606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuyken, W., & Tsivrikos, D. (2009). Therapist competence, comorbidity and cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 42–48. doi: 10.1159/000172619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liness, S., Beale, S., Lea, S., Byrne, S., Hirsch, C. R., & Clark, D. M. (2019). The sustained effects of CBT training on therapist competence and patient outcomes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43, 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9987-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Schiefele, A., Zimmermann, D., Bohnke, J. R., & Wittmann, W. W. (2015). Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1053553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maimaris, C., Summers, C. L., Browning, C., & Palmer, C. R. (1994). Injury patterns in cyclists attending an accident and emergency department: a comparison of helmet wearers and non-wearers. British Medical Journal, 308, 1537–1540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milewska, A. J., Citko, D., Jankowska, D., Milewski, R., Kononczuk, K., Wiesak, T., Morgan, A., & Milewski, R. (2018). The use of log-linear analysis for pregnancy prediction. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 56, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minonne, G. A. (2008). Therapist adherence, patient alliance and depression change in the NIMH treatment for depression collaborative research program. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.Google Scholar
NHS Digital (2017). Psychological Therapies: Annual Report on the Use of IAPT Services England 2016/17. Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB19098/psyc-ther-ann-rep-2014-15.pdf (accessed 27 April 2019).Google Scholar
NHS Digital (2018). Psychological Therapies: Annual Report on the Use of IAPT Services England 2017/18. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/psychological-therapies-annual-reports-on-the-use-of-iapt-services/annual-report-2017---18 (accessed 27 April 2019).Google Scholar
NHS England (2016). 2015 Adult IAPT Workforce Census Report. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/mentalhealth/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2016/09/adult-iapt-workforce-census-report-15.pdf (accessed 27 April 2019).Google Scholar
Parker, Z., & Waller, G. (2015). Factors related to psychotherapists’ self-assessment bias when treating anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 66, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2008) Using an evidenced-based methodology to identify the competencies required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465808004141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxon, D., & Barkham, M. (2012) Patterns of therapist variability: therapist effects and the contribution of patient severity and risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 535–546. doi: 10.1037/a0028898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxon, D., Firth, N., & Barkham, M. (2017) The relationship between therapist effects and therapy delivery factors: therapy modality, dosage, and non-completion. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44, 705–715. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0750-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafran, R., Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., Arntz, A., Barlow, D. H., Ehlers, A., et al. (2009). Mind the gap: improving the dissemination of CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 902–909. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, B. F., Elkin, I., Yamaguchi, J., Olmstead, M., Vallis, T. M., Dobson, K. S., Lowery, A., Sotsky, S. M., Watkins, J. T., & Imber, S. D. (1999). Therapist competence ratings in relation to clinical outcome in cognitive therapy of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.837CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strunk, D. R., Brotman, M. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Hollon, S. D. (2010). Therapist competence in cognitive therapy for depression: predicting subsequent symptom change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 429–437. doi: 10.1037/a0019631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, G., & Turner, H. (2016). Therapist drift-redux: why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 77, 129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, C. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Barber, J. P. (2010) Therapist adherence/competence and treatment outcome: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 200–211. doi: 10.1037/a0018912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarafonitis-Muller, S., Kuhr, K., & Bechtdolf, A. (2014). The relationship between therapist’s competence and adherence to outcome in cognitive behavioural therapy – results of a meta analysis. Fortschritte Der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 82, 502–510. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366798Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials

Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials 1

Download Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 13.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials

Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials 2

Download Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 14.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials

Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials 3

Download Bateup et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 13.7 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.