Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:30:35.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Clinical Response/Plasma Level Relationship for Clomipramine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. E. Dutt
J. E. Dutt*
Affiliation:
EM Laboratories, (Associate of E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Hawthorne, N.Y. 10532
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 140 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 105
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Della Corte, L. et al (1979) Clinical response and tricyclic plasma levels during treatment with clomipramine. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 390—400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutt, J. E. (1981a) On the clinical response/serum level relationship for antidepressants. I: Amitriptyline. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 17, 42—55.Google ScholarPubMed
Dutt, J. E. (1981b) On the clinical response/serum level relationship for antidepressants. II: Lofepramine and imipramine. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. (In press).Google Scholar
Feighner, J. P. et al (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57—63.Google Scholar
Glassman, A. H. et al (1977) Clinical implications of imipramine plasma levels for depressive illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 197—204.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56—62.Google Scholar
Vandel, S. et al (1978) Clinical response and plasma concentration of amitrpityline and its metabolite nortriptyline. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 14, 185–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.