Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T18:35:04.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stalking: false claims of victimisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michele Pathé ,
Paul E. Mullen  and
Rosemary Purcell
Michele Pathé*
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, PO Box 266, Rosanna, Victoria 3084, Australia
Paul E. Mullen
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, PO Box 266, Rosanna, Victoria 3084, Australia
Rosemary Purcell
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, PO Box 266, Rosanna, Victoria 3084, Australia
*
Dr M. Pathé, 213–219 Brunswick Road, Brunswick, Victoria 3056, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

False allegations of victimisation although uncommon are important to recognise. This paper examines those who falsely claim to have been the victims of stalking.

Aims

To highlight the phenomenon of false victims of stalking.

Method

Twelve individuals who falsely claimed to be victims of stalking were compared with a group of 100 true stalking victims.

Results

False stalking victims presented for help earlier than real victims and were less likely to claim harassment via letters. They reported equivalent levels of violence directed at themselves but seldom claimed others were attacked. Five types of false claimants were recognisable. False victims consumed more medical services than genuine stalking victims and they were more likely to be embroiled in legal action. They reported similar levels of distress with suicidal ruminations in over 40%.

Conclusions

The current interest in stalking is promoting false claims of being stalked. Early identification of these cases and appropriate intervention are essential to both minimising abuses of resources available to true victims and equally to ensure appropriate care for those who express their own disordered state in false claims of victimisation.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 174 , Issue 2 , February 1999 , pp. 170 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Declaration of interest None.

References

Eisendrath, S. J. (1994) When Munchausen becomes malingering: factitious disorders that penetrate the legal system. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 24, 471–481.Google Scholar
Feldman-Schorrig, S. (1996) Factitious sexual harassment. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Low, 24, 387–392.Google Scholar
Janofsky, J. S. (1994) The Munchausen syndrome in civil forensic psychiatry. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 22, 489–497.Google Scholar
Kanin, E. J. (1994) False rape allegations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 81–92.Google Scholar
Long, B. L., (1994) Psychiatric diagnoses in sexual harassment cases. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 22, 195–203.Google ScholarPubMed
Mohandie, K., Hatcher, C. A Raymond, D. (1996) False victimization syndromes. In The Psychology of Stalking: Clinical and Forensic Perspectives (ed. Meloy, J. R.), pp. 227–257. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pathé, M. & Mullen, P. E. (1997) The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12–17.Google Scholar
SPSS Corporation (1997) SY5TAT for Windows, version 7.01. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
Travis, J., Holden, G., Moran, L. D., et al (1996) Domestic Violence. Stalking, and Anti-Stalking Legislation. Annual Report to Congress, March 1996. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.