Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:30:25.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing Family Relationships: A Multi-method, Multi-situational Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

L. G. Walker
Affiliation:
University Department of Mental Health, Clinical Research Centre, Royal Cornhill Hospital, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, AB9 2ZH
N. Thomson
Affiliation:
Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital
W. R. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Monklands District General Hospital

Summary

Ratings of behaviour and family relationships were made on the basis of (a) a non-schedule standardised interview, (b) direct observation of family interaction during a meal time and (c) direct observation of mother-child interaction during free play. A number of scales met a battery of reliability and other criteria, and possible generalisation of these ratings across methods (interview versus direct observation) and settings (meal time versus free play) was assessed. For the vast majority of scales this was low. Reasons for this, together with some clinical implications, are discussed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, G. W. & Rutter, M. (1966) The measurement of family activities and relationships: a methodological study. Human Relations, 19, 241–63.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D. V. (1976) Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: resolving some basic issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 452–6.Google Scholar
Crown, S. & Crisp, A. H. (1979) Manual of the Crown-Crisp Experimental Index. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Hall, J. N. (1974) Inter-rater reliability of ward rating scales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 248–55.Google Scholar
Hall, J. N. (1980) Ward rating scales for long stay patients: a review. Psychological Medicine, 10, 277–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinston, W., Loader, P. & Stratford, D. J. (1979) Clinical assessment of family interaction: a reliability study. Journal of Family Therapy, 1, 291312.Google Scholar
Lipinski, D. & Nelson, R. (1974) Problems in the use of the naturalistic observation as a means of behavioral assessment. Behavior Therapy, 5, 341–51.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1968) Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
P.A.B. (1980) Technical recommendations for psychometric tests. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 33, 161–4.Google Scholar
Quinton, D., Rutter, M. & Rolands, O. (1976) An evaluation of an interview assessment of marriage. Psychological Medicine, 6, 577–86.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. & Brown, G. W. (1966) The reliability and validity of measures of family life and relationships in families containing a psychiatric patient. Social Psychiatry, 1, 3853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, R. R., Maccoby, E. E. & Levin, H. (1957) Patterns of Child Rearing. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Walker, L. G. & McKay, E. (1981) Assessment and treatment facilities for pre-school handicapped children: practice and experience at Raeden Centre, Aberdeen. In Research Highlights Number Two—Normalisation, (ed. E. Reinach) Aberdeen: Department of Social Work, King's College.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. L. & Margolin, G. (1977) Assessment of marital conflict and accord. In Handbook of Behavioral Assessment. (eds. A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun and H. E. Adams). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. & Lubin, B. (1965) Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing service.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.