Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:27:19.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope Observations of the Magellanic Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Joel Wm. Parker
Affiliation:
Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
Jesse K. Hill
Affiliation:
Raytheon STX Corporation, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Robert Cornett
Affiliation:
Raytheon STX Corporation, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Joan Hollis
Affiliation:
Raytheon STX Corporation, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Emily Zamkoff
Affiliation:
Raytheon STX Corporation, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Ralph C. Bohlin
Affiliation:
STScI, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Robert W. O'Connell
Affiliation:
Astronomy Dept., Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
Susan G. Neff
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Andrew M. Smith
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Theodore P. Stecher
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA&Apos;s GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Morton S. Roberts
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present an analysis of wide-field, far-ultraviolet images of the LMC and SMC obtained by the Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope. The photometric catalog of over 37,000 stars allows us to make large-scale, statistical studies of massive star formation in OB associations and in the field population. Our results show that: (1) the most probable slope for the initial mass function (IMF) of field stars is Γ = −1.80, slightly steeper than the Salpeter slope; and (2) there doesn't seem to be a single, unique IMF slope for stars in OB associations, with a range of values from Γ = −1.0 to −2.0. We also analyze the stellar vs. diffuse UV flux, and the population of OB star candidates in the field.

Type
Part 3. Massive Stars and 30 Doradus
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1999 

References

Cheng, K.-P., et al. 1992, ApJ, 395, L29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornett, R. H., et al. 1994, ApJ, 430, L117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornett, R. H., et al. 1997, AJ, 113, 1011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. D., Elliott, K. H., Meaburn, J. 1976, MmRAS, 81, 89 (DEM) Google Scholar
Hill, J. K., et al. 1993, ApJ, 413, 604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. K., et al. 1994, ApJ, 425, 122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. S., et al. 1995, ApJ, 446, 622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P. W. 1985, PASP, 97, 530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucke, P. B., Hodge, P. W. 1970, AJ, 75, 171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. Wm., et al. 1996, ApJ, 472, L29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. Wm., et al. 1998 AJ, 116, 180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salpeter, E.E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar