Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T08:01:56.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HI and Hot Gas in the Outskirts of the M81 Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

M. Bureau
Affiliation:
Hubble Fellow, Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, 550 West 120th Street, 1027 Pupin Hall, Mail Code 5247, New York, NY 10027, U.S.A.
F. Walter
Affiliation:
Jansky Fellow, NRAO, P.O. Box O, Socorro, NM 87801, U.S.A.
J. van Gorkom
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, 538 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, U.S.A.
C. Carignan
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results are presented from a wide area, high resolution HI synthesis survey of the outer regions of the nearby M81 group, where internal (galactic) and external (group-related) evolution processes can be studied simultaneously in great detail. The survey encompasses the star forming dwarf galaxies M81dwA, UGC4483, and HoII, where evidence of ram pressure stripping was recently discovered. The data do not reveal any intergalactic HI, but the outer parts of HoII are reminiscent of tidal tails. We argue however that those structures are equally consistent with the latest ram pressure models including cooling. The case for a hot intergalactic medium in this poor, spiral-only group is thus still open. The survey also puts tight constraints on possible counterparts to the local high velocity cloud population in an external group, reaching a 3σ column density of 1019 atom cm−2 and a 6σ limiting mass of 1.5 × 105M.

Type
Part 3. Ejection and Outflow
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Blitz, L., Spergel, D. N., Teuben, P. J., Hartmann, D., & Burton, W. B. 1999, ApJ, 514, 818.Google Scholar
Bureau, M., & Carignan, C. 2002, AJ, 123, 1316.Google Scholar
Howard, S., & Byrd, G. G. 1990, AJ, 99, 1798.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., et al. 2000, A&A, 363, 117.Google Scholar
Puche, D., Westpfahl, D., Brinks, E., & Roy, J.-R. 1992, AJ, 103, 1841.Google Scholar
Putman, M. E., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 873.Google Scholar
Quilis, V., Moore, B., & Bower, R. 2000, Science, 288, 1617.Google Scholar
Rhode, K. L., Salzer, J. J., Westpfahl, D. J., & Radice, L. A. 1999, AJ, 118, 323.Google Scholar
Rots, A. H., Crane, P. C., Bosnia, A., Athanassoula, E., & van der Hulst, J. M. 1990, AJ, 100, 387.Google Scholar
Sargent, W. L. W., Sancisi, R., & Lo, K. Y. 1983, ApJ, 265, 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, S., & Struck, C. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 185.Google Scholar