Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T17:54:10.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Galaxy Evolution in Distant Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

B.M. Poggianti
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Instituut, P.O. Box 800, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands
G. Barbaro
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A significant evolution has been detected in intermediate redshift clusters (z < 0.9), first by photometric studies ([1], [2]), which showed an excess of blue objects; subsequent spectroscopic studies revealed anomalies in most of the galaxies, mainly consisting of excessively strong Balmer lines. In order to explain the spectroscopic observations, bursts of star formation superimposed to the traditional scenario of galactic evolution are needed. The analysis of spectral lines and colours by means of an evolutionary synthesis model ([3]), including both the stellar contribution and the emission of the ionized gas, allows in most of the cases the determination of the time elapsed since the end of the burst and the fraction of galactic mass involved in it. In the clusters considered (AC103, AC114, AC118 at z = 0.31, [4]), the theoretical analysis demonstrates that the bursts affect substantial galactic mass fractions, typically 30 % or more. The observations can be equally well reproduced by either elliptical+burst models or by spiral+burst models in which the star formation is truncated at the end of the burst. The analysis of an UV colour such as (1550-V) is proposed as a valid method to distinguish between the two cases for Hδ strong red galaxies.

Type
Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

1. Butcher, H.R., Oemler, A. Jr, 1978, ApJ 219, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Butcher, H.R., Oemler, A. Jr, 1984, ApJ 285, 426.Google Scholar
3. Poggianti, B.M., 1995, , .Google Scholar
4. Couch, W.J., Sharpies, R.M., 1987, MNRAS 229, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar