Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:22:24.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of the superfine structure in the Orion KL jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Leonid I. Matveyenko
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute, Profsojuznaja 84/32, 117810 Moscow, Russia
Phil J. Diamond
Affiliation:
Nuffield Radio Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11, 9DL, UK
David A. Graham
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121, Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have studied the superfine structure of the active H2O maser region in Orion KL with an angular resolution of ≤ 0.3 × 0.7 mas. The high level of H2O maser emission from 1979-1988 was due to an accretion disk, which is divided into five groups of protoplanetary rings. The peak brightness temperatures of the structures was Tpeak = 1013-14 K. The region is located in the OMC-1 molecular cloud, VLSR ⋍ 7.74 km/s. The cloud amplifies by more than two orders of magnitude the emission from the structures, whose radial velocities are within the maser window ±0.3 km/s. Due to this, the velocity of the H2O super maser emission is constant. In the quiescent period of 1995 a 6 AU jet was discovered, PA = −32°, Tb ⋍ 1011K. In 1998 the jet's brightness temperature increased by more than 3 orders of magnitude. Initially the jet's position angle was PA = −45°, and then changed to PA = −38°. During the period of decreasing emission in 1999 the jet had changed its form and became a helix, that suggests the precession of the rotation axes. In the central part of the jet there is a compact bright source - “the ejector” - with Tejc = 1017 K.

Type
Part 1. Star Formation
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002 

References

Abraham, Z. et al. 1981, A&A, 100, L10 Google Scholar
Garay, G., Moran, J.M., Hashick, A.D. 1989, ApJ, 338, 224 Google Scholar
Genzel, R. et al. 1978, A&A, 66, 13 Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. et al., 2000, in Proc. of the VSOP Symp., 109 Google Scholar
Matveyenko, L.I. 1981 SovAL, 7, 100 Google Scholar
Matveyenko, L.I., Graham, D.A., Diamond, P.J. 1988, SovAL, 14, 1101 Google Scholar
Matveyenko, L.I., Diamond, P.J., Graham, D.A. 1998, SovAL, 24, 723 Google Scholar
Matveyenko, L.I., Diamond, P.J., Graham, D.A. 2000, AZh, 9, 869 Google Scholar
Matveyenko, L.I., Diamond, P.J., Graham, D.A. 2001, in Proc. IAU Conf. 205 Google Scholar
Tolmachev, A.M. 2000, SvAL, 26, 41.Google Scholar