Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-5wl6q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T07:43:51.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Anatomy of Dusty Disks Imaged by NICMOS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Glenn Schneider
Affiliation:
Steward Obs., U. Az., 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721 USA
Dean C. Hines
Affiliation:
Steward Obs., U. Az., 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721 USA
Murray Silverstone
Affiliation:
Steward Obs., U. Az., 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721 USA
Alycia J. Weinberger
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS) on the Hubble Space Telescope we have conducted a coronagraphic imaging survey of 18 main sequence stars with large infrared excesses, searching for circumstellar dust (debris) in scattered light. Dusty disks with radial and hemispheric brightness anisotropies and complex morphologies, both possibly indicative of dynamical interactions with unseen planetary mass companions, were spatially resolved and imaged around three young (≲ 10Myr old) stars. From these observations we describe the debris systems around: a) HR 4796A (A0V), a 70 AU radius ring less than 14 AU wide with unequal ansal flux densities; b) HD 141569A (Herbig Ae/Be), a 400 AU radius disk with a 40 AU wide gap; and c) TW Hya (K7 T-Tauri), a pole-on circularly symmetric disk with a radial break in its surface density of scattering particles. Additionally, our non-detection of scattered light and high precision photometry of a fourth system of similar age, HD 98800 A/B, coupled with mid and thermal IR measurements, greatly constrain a likely model for the debris about the B component.

Type
Part IV: Protoplanetary and β Pic disks
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Augereau, J. C., et al. 1999a, A&A, 350, L51.Google Scholar
Augereau, J. C., et al. 2000, A&A, in press.Google Scholar
Augereau, J. C., et al. 1999b, A&A, 348, 557.Google Scholar
Beuzit, J., et al. 1997, A&AS, 125, 175.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. S., et al. 2000, ApJ, 532, L141.Google Scholar
Gehrz, R. D., et al. 1999, AAS Meeting, 195, 7812.Google Scholar
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1979, Nature, 277, 97.Google Scholar
Grady, C.A., et al. 1999a, ApJ, 523, L151.Google Scholar
Grady, C.A., et al. 1999b, AAS Meeting, 195, 0208.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. S., Mannings, V. & Holland, W. S. 2000, Icarus, 143, 155.Google Scholar
Jayawardhana, , et al. 1998, ApJ, 503, L79.Google Scholar
Jura, M. 1991, ApJ, 383, L79.Google Scholar
Jura, M., et al. 1995, ApJ, 445, 451.Google Scholar
Kastner, J. H., et al. 1997, Science, 277, 67.Google Scholar
Kalas, P. & Jewitt, D. 1995, A J, 110, 794.Google Scholar
Kenyon, , et al. 1999, ApJ, 524, LI 19.Google Scholar
Koerner, D. W., et al. 1998, ApJ, 503, L83.Google Scholar
Koerner, D. W., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, L37.Google Scholar
Krist, J. E., et al. 2000, ApJ, 538, 793.Google Scholar
Pantin, E., Waelkens, C. & Lagage, P. O. 2000, A&A, 361, L9.Google Scholar
Low, F. J., Hines, D. C., & Schneider, G. 1999, ApJ, 520, L45.Google Scholar
Rucinski, S.M., & Krautter, J. 1983, A&A, 121, 217.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. et al. 1999, ApJ, 513, L127.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. et al. 2000, Lecture Notes in Physics, (Springer-Verlag), in press.Google Scholar
Silverstone, M. D. et al. 1998, AAS Meeting, 193, 7316.Google Scholar
Smith, B. A., & Terrile, R. J. 1984, Science, 226, 1421.Google Scholar
Stauffer, J.R., Hartmann, L.W. & Barrado y Navascues, D. 1995, ApJ, 454, 910.Google Scholar
Telesco, C. M. et al. 2000, ApJ, 530, 329.Google Scholar
Torres, G., et al. 1995, ApJ, 452, 870.Google Scholar
Webb, R. A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 512, L63.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A. J., et al. 1999a, ApJ, 525, L53.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A. J., et al. 1999b, AAS Meeting, 194, 6904.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A. J., et al. 2000, ApJ, in press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, D. A., Sandell, G. & Duncan, W. D. 1989, ApJ, 340, L69.Google Scholar
Weintraub, D. A., Kastner, J. H. & Bary, J. S. 2000, ApJ, 541, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, M. C., et. al. 1999, ApJ, 527, 918.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B., & Becklin, E. E. 1993, ApJ, 406, L25.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B., Forveille, T., & Kastner, J. H. 1995, Nature, 373, 494.Google Scholar