Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:38:16.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chunking and Phonological Memory: A Response to Ellis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Roy C. Major
Affiliation:
Arizona State University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Responses
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angelica, J., & Ney, J. W. (1995). Linguistic ambiguity in a connectionist model for grammatical studies. Language and Communication, 15, 227240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, E. (1983). Non-obvious transfer: On predicting epenthesis errors. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 269280). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1987, 10). How is meaning maintained? The role of probability matching. Paper presented at the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics,Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1995). Embodied minds and meanings. In Baumgartner, P. & Payr, S. (Eds.), Speaking minds: Interviews with twenty eminent cognitive scientists (pp. 115129). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. (1995). Toward a pragmatic connectionism. In Baumgartner, P. & Payr, S. (Eds.), Speaking minds: Interviews with twenty eminent cognitive scientists (pp. 130144). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar