No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pastoral Perfection: Cardinal Manning and the Secular Clergy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
Towards the end of his life Cardinal Manning made some notes on what he called, ‘Hindrances to the Spread of Catholicism in England’. High on his list was the state of the English diocesan clergy: they were, he felt, neither cultured nor ‘civil’, in that they were unprepared to play a part in public life and did not understand English institutions and the outlook of the educated Englishman. One might in passing wonder how the Cardinal squared this criticism with his desire that the seminaries which trained these priests should remain secluded from the world and that Catholics should not be allowed to attend the English universities. But he felt that a stronger failing in the clergy was the low opinion which they had of their own calling and the low esteem in which many of the faithful held them. They were regarded as no more than parochial hacks, not expected to raise their sights beyond the roofs of the slums which they served. They were, according to Manning, compared unfavourably with the regular clergy, as preachers, confessors, directors of souls, judges of vocations, and even advisers in worldly matters, they were held in less esteem. Lay people were too fond of saving, ‘He is only a secular priest’; this judgement had been passed so often that the parochial clergy had come to believe it themselves, and when they were exhorted to higher things too often replied, ‘I am only a secular’.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1989
References
1 Purcell, E. D., Life of Cardinal Manning, Archbishop of Westminster, 2 vols (London, 1896, repr. New York, 1973), 2, pp. 773–92. Google Scholar
2 Ibid., pp. 784–5.
3 Ibid.
4 Letter to Bishop Ullathorne, in Butler, C., The Life and Times of Bishop Ullathome,2 vols (London, 1926), 2, p. 153.Google Scholar
5 Connolly, G. P., ‘The Secular Missioner of the North’, North West Catholic History, 10(1983), p. 23.Google Scholar
6 Aid., p. 27. For the Liverpool priests, Burke, T., Catholic History of Liverpool (Liverpool, 1910), pp. 63, 86–7.Google Scholar
7 Manning to Talbot, in Butler, 1, pp. 358—9.
8 Ward, B., The Sequel to Catholic Emancipation,2vols (London, 1915), l, pp. 138–9.Google Scholar
9 Purcell, 2, p. 787.
10 ‘Fiber’s sermon at the consecration of Bishop Goss of Liverpool, Tablet, 1 Oct., 10 Dec., 1853.
11 Butler, 2, pp. 152–3.
12 Ibid., p. 153.
13 Ullathorne, W. B., Letters of Archbishop Ullathorne, ed. Drane, A. T. (London, 1892), p. 343.Google Scholar
14 Ullathorne, W. B., Ecclesiastical Discourses (London, 1876), pp. 115–46, at p. 135.Google Scholar
15 Ullathorne, Ecclesiastical Discourses, p. 127.
16 Ibid., pp. 129–40. “
17 Ibid., p. 120.
18 Decreta Quatuor Coneiliorum Provincialium Westmonasteriemium 1852–1873 (London, n.d.), pp. 214–30.
19 Ibid., pp. 234–6.
20 Ibid., pp. 237–8.
21 Leslie, Shane, Henry Edward Manning: His Life and Labours (London, 1921), pp. 342–3.Google Scholar
22 Ibid., p. 295.
23 Butler, 2, p. 189. For the decree Romanos Pontífices see Decreta, pp. 345–65.
24 Review in The Month, 49(1883), pp. 571–3. See also Leslie, p. 339.
25 Butler, 2, pp. 154–6; Leslie, pp. 341–3.
26 Leslie, p. 343.
27 Manning, H. E., The Eternal Priesthood(London, 1883). I have used the 21st ed of 1936. References will be to E.P.Google Scholar
28 E.p., pp. 83–4, 120.
29 Ward, M. The Wilfrid Wards and the Transition (London, 1934), pp. 209–10.Google Scholar
30 E.P., pp. 3–11.
31 E.P., pp. 12–25.
32 Ibid., pp. 26, 41, 42.
33 Ibid., pp. 41, 47-8, 71-3.
34 Ibid., p. 35; Decreta, p. 225.
35 Purcell, 2, pp. 782–3; also, E.P., p. 17. The missions in England were not canonical parishes, but in practice the priest’s position was the same.
36 Purcell, 2, p. 782.
37 Connolly, G. P., ‘The Priest as Holy Man in the Ghetto’, in SCH 19, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar
38 E.P., cap. XVII.
39 Ibid., pp. 168–70.
40 Ibid., pp. 91–2.
41 Ibid., pp. 88–9, 106, 110.
42 Ibid., pp. 118–19, 238, 267.
43 Ibid., p. 160.
44 Ibid., pp. 211–12.
45 Ibid., p. 216.
46 Ibid., pp. 206, 218–19.
47 Ibid., p. 117. Decreta, pp. 218–19.
48 Mahoney, E. J., The Secular Priesthood (London, 1930), chaps. 8 and 9, and pp. 233–9.Google Scholar
49 Purcell, 2, pp. 773–81. See also Doyle, P., ‘The Education and Training of Roman Catholic Priests in Nineteenth-Century England’.JEH 35 (1984), pp. 208–19.Google Scholar