Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:33:20.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional Change and the Presidential Mandate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Julia R. Azari
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Often treated as a unified concept with a single definition, the presidential mandate actually encompasses multiple definitions, each connected to distinct ideas about democracy and presidential leadership. This article looks at how and when modern presidents have used mandate rhetoric and seeks to explain changes in presidential mandate-claiming patterns. Using an original dataset of 1,467 presidential communications from 1933 through 2009, I find that after 1969 presidents became more likely to use election results to justify their actions. However, they also became less likely to emphasize the magnitude of the election result, focusing their mandate rhetoric instead on campaign promises and distinctions between candidates and parties. Evidence suggests that this shift is the result of a combination of several factors: changes to the presidential nomination system, polarized party politics, and an overall decline in presidential approval ratings. Based on this research, I conclude that ideas about the presidential mandate are closely connected with the political conditions and challenges facing presidents. As the place of the presidency has shifted in American politics, the ways in which presidents interpret and communicate about elections have also changed.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , Winter 2013 , pp. 483 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John P. (1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in the American System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W.Han, HahriePope, Jeremie C. (2007) “Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 79–105.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A. (1991) Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Carter, Jimmy (1977) Televised address to the nation on energy, February 2.Google Scholar
Conley, Patricia Heidotting (2001) Presidential Mandates: How Elections Set the National Agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1990) “The myth of the presidential mandate.” Political Science Quarterly 105 (3): 355–72.Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight (1953) “The president's news conference,” February 17, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=9623&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J.Kirk, Stephen (1995) “Presidential mandates in the nineteenth century: Conceptual change and institutional development.” Studies in American Political Development 9 (1): 117–86.Google Scholar
Garfield, James (1881) “Inaugural address,” March 4. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25823&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J.Peterson, David A. M.Stimson, James A. (2006) Mandate Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S.Pierson, Paul (2005) “Abandoning the middle: The Bush tax cuts and the limits of Democratic control.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 33–53.Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon B. (1965) “Remarks upon receiving the Anti-Defamation League Award,” February 3. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=27174&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1988) The Trusteeship Presidency. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (2005) The Presidency in a Separated System, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey M. (2010) “Obama's approval most polarized for first-year president.” Gallup Politics, January 25, www.gallup.com/poll/125345/obama-approvalpolarized-first-year-president.aspx.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1955) “A theory of critical elections.” Journal of Politics 17 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Klinghard, Daniel (2005) “Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, and the emergence of the president as party leader.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (4): 736–60.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C.Carsey, Thomas M.Horowitz, Juliana Menasche (2006) “Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83–110.Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney M. (2009) Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive Party, and the Transformation of American Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard (1973a) “Annual budget message to the Congress, fiscal year 1974,” January 29. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=3908&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard (1973b) “State of the Union Message to the Congress on law enforcement and drug abuse prevention,” March 14. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=4140&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans (2010) “Ten things that political scientists know that you don't.” Forum 8 (3): 1–19.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack H. (2009) “Remarks at the House Democratic Caucus Issues Conference in Williamsburg, Virginia,” February 5, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=85739&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel (1972) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W.Wildavsky, AaronHopkins, David A. (2008) Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald (1985) “Remarks at a White House meeting with members of the National Governors’ Association,” February 25. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=38256&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. (1988 [1982]) Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D. (1933) “Inaugural address,” March 4. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14473&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D. (1937) “Address at the Democratic victory dinner, Washington, D.C.,” March 4. American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=15378&st=&st1=.Google Scholar
Ross, Fiona (2007) “Policy histories and partisan leadership in presidential studies: The case of Social Security,” in Edwards, George C. IIIKing, Desmond (eds.) The Polarized Presidency of George W. Bush. New York: Oxford University Press: 419–46.Google Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew (2005) The New Imperial Presidency: Renewing Presidential Power after Watergate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Richard (2008) “George W. Bush and the partisan presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 123 (4): 605–22.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen (1997) The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stid, Daniel (1998) The President as Statesman. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. (1987) The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilentz, Sean (2005) Jackson, Andrew. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Woolley, JohnPeters, Gerhard (n.d.) American Presidency Project, University of California, Santa Barbara, www.presidency.ucsb.edu (accessed March 2006).Google Scholar