Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:14:27.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blocking the Future: New Solutions for Old Problems in Historical Social Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Peter Bearman ,
Robert Faris  and
James Moody
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The only true voyage would be not to travel through a hundred different lands with the same pair of eyes, but to see the same land with a hundred different pairs of eyes.

Marcel Proust

Although it may turn out to be otherwise, this is an early article in what is hoped to be a larger series of studies in the application of network methods to historical problems. This article explores some new solutions to old problems in historical social science and history more generally and provides some templates for thinking about an old problem in a new light. The old problem is the problem that arises when one considers how we know what historical events mean and how we can have confidence in our interpretations. For many social science historians, the problem of meaning is secondary to the problem of making causal arguments. And often the practical reality of much historical work is that more mundane problems of data and evidence often consume an unusual amount of time and energy, drawing attention away from the luxurious concerns discussed in this article — concerns with what things actually mean. Despite the recognition that the problem of meaning may not lurk around every corner for all social science historians, the goal of this article is to propose some new strategies for determining what things mean in historical context.

Type
Special Issue: What Is Social Science History?
Information
Social Science History , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , Winter 1999 , pp. 501 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We have benefited from the comments of Craig Calhoun, Roger Gould, Katherine Stovel, John Padgett, and Charles Tilly. Harrison White read an early draft of many of the ideas discussed in this article and made substantial contributions too deep to easily acknowledge. Papers that explored similar problems were presented at the University of Washington, the Chicago Business School, the Stanford Business School, New York University, Princeton University, and the Center for Social Sciences at Columbia University. We thank Margaret Levi, Edgar Kiser, Joel Podolny, Doug Guthrie, Paul DiMaggio, and Jesper Sorenson for providing these opportunities. Douglas White’s foundational work on bicomponents provided the impetus for many of the basic technical ideas we have pursued, and we gratefully acknowledge his important contributions. Finally, we thank Paula Baker for her support and encouragement. Address all correspondence to the senior author: Peter Bearman, Institute for Social and Economic Theory and Research, 801IAB, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. E-mail: [email protected].

The figures in this article were done in Pajek, a software program created by Vladimir Batagelj and Andrej Mrvar, available on the World Wide Web.

References

Abbott, Andrew (1988) “Transcending general linear reality.” Sociological Theory 6:169–86.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew (1992) “From causes to events: Notes on narrative positivism.” Sociological Methods and Research 20: 428–55.Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen, and Rossen, Ronan Va (1997) “Networks of contention: Villages and regional structure in the seventeenth-century Ottoman Empire.” American Journal of Sociology 102(5): 1345–82.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter (1993) Relations into Rhetorics. ASA Rose Monograph Series. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter (1997) “Generalized exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 102(5): 1383–1415.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter (1999) Blocking the Future. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter, and Stovel, Katherine (forthcoming) “Becoming a Nazi: A model for narrative networks.” Poetics.Google Scholar
Brudner, Lilyan, and White, Douglas (1997) “Class, property, and structural endogamy: Visualizing networked histories.” Theory and Society 25: 161–208.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth (1945) A Grammar of Motive. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. (1985) Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M., and Goodwin, J. (1994) “Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 1411–54.Google Scholar
Frank, Ove (1978) “Sampling and estimation in large social networks.” Social Networks 1: 91–101.Google Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto (1999) From Words to Numbers. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. (1995) Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. (1996) “Patron-client ties, state centralization, and the Whiskey Rebellion.” American Journal of Sociology 102(5): 400–429.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark (1977) “Network sampling: Some first steps.” American Journal of Sociology 81(6): 1287–1303.Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry (1992) “Temporality, events, and explanation in historical sociology: An introduction.” Sociological Methods and Research 20: 403–27.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leifer, Eric (1988) “Interaction preludes to role settings.” American Sociological Review 53(6): 865–78.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David (1985) The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marriot, McKim (1968) “Caste ranking and food transactions, a matrix analysis,” in Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernhard S. (eds.) Structure and Change in Indian Society. Chicago: Aldine: 63–89.Google Scholar
Morey, R., and Agresti, Alan (1984) “The measurement of classification agreement: An adjustment to the Rand statistic for chance agreement.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 44: 33–37.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Jan (1965) Report from a Chinese Village. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Padgett, John, and Christopher Ansell (1993) “Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1259–1319.Google Scholar
Palmer, David (1984) “Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 40–55.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Naomi et al. (1987) “Social movements and network analysis: A case study of nineteenth-century women’s reform in New York State.” American Journal of Sociology 90:1022–54.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. (1996) “Historical events as transformation of structures: Inventing revolution at the Bastille.” Theory and Society 25(6): 841–81.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney (1996) The Rise of Christianity: A Sociologist Reconsiders History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stovel, Katherine (1994) “The structure of lynching: Temporal pattern and spatial variation in the Deep South, 1882-1930.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1999) Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Mark (1985) Armies of the Poor: Determinants of Working-Class Participation in the Parisian Insurrection of 1948. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Douglas, Schnegg, Michael, Brudner, Lilyan, and Nutini, Hugo (1999) “Status groups and structural endogamy: Compadrazgo in rural Tlaxcala, Mexico.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
White, Harrison (1992) Identity and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar