Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:21:20.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Cost of Cuts in Welfare Spending for Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2014

Clare Beckett
Clare Beckett*
Affiliation:
Division of Social Science and Criminal Justice Studies, University of Bradford E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current austerity in government spending has far reaching implications, not only for individuals but for the context in which a welfare state is perceived. The position has been reached at the same time as equality legislation makes some groups more visible. This article is an early attempt at drawing out the relationship between lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people and welfare spending cuts, made observable because of legislation requiring impact assessment. This article draws on research into impact prepared by the author, in affiliation with the Bradford LGBT Strategic Partnership, and considers LGB claims to welfare and to citizenship.

Keywords

Citizenshipequalityimpact assessmentvisibilityevidence
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 29 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert Kennedy Trust (2012) About Us, http://www.akt.org.uk/2/spg330/albert_kennedy_trust_-_helping_young_lgbt_people/about_us.aspx (accessed 23 September 2012).Google Scholar
Aspinall, P. (2009) Estimating the Size and Composition of the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Population in Britain, Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 37, London: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
Beckett (2012) ‘Silence in the sexual agenda of a UK probation service’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31, 8, 753–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, W. (1942) Social Insurance and Allied Services, HMSO CMND 6404, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Birch, E., Gates, G. and Ost, J. (2004) Gay and Lesbian Atlas, America: Association of American University Presses.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, B. (2009) Bisexual People in the Workplace: A Practical Guide for Employers, London: Stonewall Workplace Guides.Google Scholar
Colgan, F. and Wright, T. (2011) ‘Lesbian, gay and bisexual equality in a modernizing public sector 1997–2010: opportunities and threats’, Gender, Work and Organisation, 18, 5, 548–70.Google Scholar
D’augelli, A. (2002) ‘Mental health problems among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths ages 14 to 21’, Clinical Child Psychiatry, 7, 3, 433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decena, C. U. (2008) ‘Profiles, compulsory disclosure and ethical sexual citizenship in the contemporary USA’, Sexualities, 1, 4, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (2010) National Cancer Patient Experience Survey, London: DoH.Google Scholar
Dorling, D. and Thomas, B. (2011) Bankrupt Britain: An Atlas of Social Change, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fawcett Society (2012) The Impact of Austerity on Women, London: Fawcett Society Policy Briefing.Google Scholar
Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J. and Beautrais, A. L. (1999) ‘Is sexual orientation related to mental health problems and suicidality in young people?’, Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 10, 876–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, G. J. (2010) Sexual Minorities in the 2008 General Social Survey: Coming Out and Demographic Characteristics, Los Angeles: UCLA, The Williams Institute, retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/00d2w91k.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2010) Spending Review, Cmnd 7892, London: The Stationery Office, Table 5.2, http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sr2010_completereport.pdf (accessed 10 April 2012).Google Scholar
Hunt, R. and Dick, S. (2008) Serves You Right – Lesbian and Gay People's Expectations of Discrimination, London: Stonewall.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2002) ‘Heteronormative citizenship and the politics of passing’, Sexualities, 5, 3, 317–36.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004) ‘Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come’, Educational Researcher, 33, 7, 14–26.Google Scholar
Joloza, T., Evans, J., O’Brien, R. and Potter-Collins, A. (2010) Measuring Sexual Identity: An Evaluation Report Office for National Statistics, London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
King, M., Semlyen, J., Tai, S., Killaspy, H., Osborn, D., Popelyuk, D. and Irwin, N. (2008) ‘A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people’, BMC Psychiatry, 8, 70.Google Scholar
McNamee, H. (2006) Out On Your Own: An Examination of the Mental Health of Young Same-sex Attracted Men, Belfast: The Rainbow Project.Google Scholar
Meeks, C. (2011) ‘Gay and straight rites of passage’, in Seidman, S., Fischer, N. and Meeks, C. (eds.), Introducing The New Sexuality Studies, 2nd edn, London and New York: Routledge Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
Musingarami, P. (2008) Older Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual People in the UK – a Policy Brief, London: International Longevity Centre.Google Scholar
O’Dea, C. (2010) Who Loses Most From Public Spending Cuts?, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5314 (accessed 10 April 2012).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2011) Experimental statistics – Integrated Household Survey – Theme: People and Places, London: ONS.Google Scholar
Phelan, S. (2001) Sexual Strangers: Gays, Lesbians and Dilemmas of Citizenship, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Portero, I. (2012) ‘Are there rights in a time of crisis?’, Disability and Society, 27, 4, 581–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remafedi, G., French, S., Story, M., Resnick, M. D. and Blum, R. (1998) ‘The relationship between suicide risk and sexual orientation: results of a population-based study’, American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1, 57–60.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (2000) ‘Constructing sexual citizenship: theorizing sexual rights’, Critical Social Policy, 20, 1, 105–35.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (2004) ‘Locating sexualities: from here to normality’, Sexualities, 7, 4, 391–411.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. and Monro, S. (2012) Sexuality, Equality and Diversity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. (1991) Epistemology of the Closet, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Seidman, S., Meeks, C. and Traschen, F. (1999) ‘Beyond the closet? The changing social meanings of homosexuality in the United States’, Sexualities, 2, 9, 9–34.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. and Lewis, P. (2005) ‘An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility’, Human Relations, 58, 10, 1253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1994) New Right Discourse on Race and Sexuality: Britain, 1968–1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, H. (2012) ‘Public sector cuts will hit women hard, thinktank warns’, The Observer, 18 March.Google Scholar
Stonewall (2006) The Housing Needs of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual (LGB) People in Wales, Cymru: Stonewall.Google Scholar
Stratton, S. (2010) ‘Women will bear brunt of budget buts, says Yvette Cooper’, The Guardian, 4 July, http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jul/04/women-budget-cuts-yvette-cooper (accessed 10 April 2012).Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2011) ‘Root and branch restructuring to achieve major cuts: the social policy programme of the 2010 Coalition government’, Social Policy and Administration, 46, 1, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. (2011) ‘The Coalition programme: a new vision for Britain or politics as usual?’, The Political Quarterly, 82, 1, 4–15.Google Scholar