Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:28:04.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The contribution of new technology to economic growth: lessons from economic history*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2010

Nicholas Crafts*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, Warwick, UK. [email protected]

Abstract

This paper reviews the analysis of technological change by cliometricians. It focuses on lessons about total factor productivity (TFP) from growth accounting and on aspects of social capability that are conducive to the effective assimilation of new technology. Key messages are that when TFP growth is very rapid this typically involves reductions in inefficiency not just technological advance and that even really important new technologies have small initial effects on aggregate productivity. Incentive structures matter greatly for the adoption of new technology, but social capability is not independent of the technological epoch as the information and communications technology (ICT) era has emphasized to Europeans.

Resumen

Este artículo revisa el análisis del cambio tecnológico por cliómetras. Se centra en las lecciones acerca de la productividad total de los factores (PTF) desde la contabilidad del crecimiento y sobre aspectos de la capacidad social que propician la asimilación efectiva de nueva tecnología. Los mensajes clave son que, cuando el crecimiento de la PTF es muy rápido, esto normalmente implica reducciones en ineficiencia no sólo avance en el cambio técnico y que incluso las nuevas tecnologías realmente importantes tienen efectos iniciales pequeños sobre la productividad agregada. Las estructuras de incentivos son realmente importantes en la adopción de nuevas tecnologías pero la capacidad social no es independiente del periodo tecnológico, como la era de las tecnologías de la información y Comunicación (TIC) muestran para los europeos.

Type
Articles/Artículos
Copyright
Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, M. (1986): «Catching Up, Forging, Ahead, and Falling Behind». Journal of Economic History 46,, pp. 385-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramovitz, M.David, P. A. (1996): «Convergence and Delayed Catch-Up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism», in R. Landau; T. Taylor, and G. Wright (eds), The Mosaic of Economic Growth. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 21-62.Google Scholar
Abramovitz, M.David, P. A. (2001): «Two Centuries of American Macroeconomic Growth: From Exploitation of Resource Abundance to Knowledge-Driven Development». Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper no. 01-05.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. (1998): «Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, pp. 1055-1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. (2009): «When Does Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation?». NBER Working Paper no. 14809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P.Howitt, P. (2006): «Appropriate Growth Theory: A Unifying Framework». Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, pp. 269-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, R.Groote, P. (1996): «The Empirics of Growth». De Economist, 144, pp. 429-444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. C. (2009): The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badinger, H. (2005): «Growth Effects of Economic Integration: Evidence from the EU Member States». Review of World Economics, 141, pp. 50-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baily, M.Kirkegaard, J. F. (2004): Transforming the European Economy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1999): «Notes on Growth Accounting». Journal of Economic Growth, 4, pp. 119-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S.Fernald, J. (2007): «Information and Communications Technology as a General Purpose Technology: Evidence from US Industry Data». German Economic Review, 8, pp. 146-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S.Weil, D. N. (1998): «Appropriate Technology and Growth». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, pp. 1025-1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, C.Crafts, N. (1996): «British Economic Growth Since 1945: Relative Economic Decline… and Renaissance?», in N. Crafts, and G. Toniolo (eds), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleaney, M.Nishiyama, A. (2002): «Explaining Growth: A Contest between Models». Journal of Economic Growth, 7, pp. 43-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boskin, M. J.; Dulberger, E. L.; Gordon, R. J.; Griliches, Z.Jorgenson, D. W. (1996): Towards a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Bosworth, B. P.Collins, S. M. (2003): «The Empirics of Growth an Update». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp. 113-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. (1994): «Technology Leadership and Productivity Leadership in Manufacturing since the Industrial Revolution: Implications for the Convergence Debate». Economic Journal, 104, pp. 291-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. (1998): «How Did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain?». Journal of Economic History, 58, pp. 375-407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E.Hitt, L. (2003): «Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence». Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, pp. 793-808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, L. P.Paterson, D. G. (1986): «Biased Technical Change, Scale and Factor Substitution in American Industry, 1850-1919». Journal of Economic History, 46, pp. 153-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, G.Wallace, C. (2002): «Macroeconomic Performance in the Bretton-Woods Period and After». Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, pp. 479-494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, W. (1996): «West German Growth and Institutions, 1945-1990», in N. Crafts, and G. Toniolo (eds), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 455-497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F.Coleman, W. J. (2006): «The World Technology Frontier». American Economic Review, 96, pp. 499-522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, P.Nicoletti, G. (2006): «Product Market Regulation in the Non-Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Countries: Measurement and Highlights». OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 530.Google Scholar
Conway, P.; De Rosa, D.; Nicoletti, G.Steiner, F. (2006): «Regulation, Competition and Productivity Convergence». OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrado, C.; Hulten, C.Sichel, D. (2009): «Intangible Capital and US Economic Growth». Review of Income and Wealth 55,, pp. 661-685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, D. (2001): «Estimating Real Income in the United States from 1888 to 1994: Correcting CPI Bias Using Engel Curves». Journal of Political Economy, 109, pp. 1288-1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (1995): «Exogenous or Endogenous Growth? The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered». Journal of Economic History, 55, pp. 745-772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (1999): «Implications of Financial Crisis for East Asian Trend Growth». Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15 (3), pp. 110-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (2004): «Steam as a General Purpose Technology: A Growth-Accounting Perspective». Economic Journal, 114, pp. 338-351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N.Mills, T. C. (2005): «TFP Growth in British and German Manufacturing, 1950-1996». Economic Journal, 115, pp. 649-670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N.Toniolo, G. (2008): «European Economic Growth, 1950-2005: An Overview». CEPR Discussion Paper no. 6863.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (1993): Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1975): Technological Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denison, E. F. (1967): Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Duval, R.de la Maisonneuve, C. (2009): «Long-Run GDP Growth Framework and Scenarios for the World Economy». OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 663.Google Scholar
Eaton, J.Kornum, S. (1999): «International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement». International Economic Review, 40, pp. 537-570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (1996): «Institutions and Economic Growth: Europe after World War II», in N. Crafts, and G. Toniolo (eds), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, R. W. (1964): Railroads and American Economic Growth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. (1979): «Notes on the Social Saving Controversy». Journal of Economic History, 39, pp. 1-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman-Peck, J. (1991): «Railways and Late Victorian Economic Growth», in J. Foreman Peck (ed.), New Perspectives on the Late Victorian Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroski, P.Jacquemin, A. (1988): «The Persistence of Profits: A European Comparison». Economic Journal, 98, pp. 375-389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. (1962): Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, O. (2009): «Corporatism and Growth Since 1945». Warwick University, MSc. thesis.Google Scholar
Goolsbee, A.Klenow, P. J. (2006): «Valuing Consumer Products by the Time Spent Using Them». American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 96, pp. 108-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gust, C.Marquez, J. (2004): «International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: The Role of Information Technology and Regulatory Practices». Labour Economics, 11, pp. 33-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habakkuk, H. J. (1962): American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, R. E.Jones, C. I. (1999): «Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, pp. 83-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harberger, A. (1998): «A Vision of the Growth Process». American Economic Review, 88, pp. 1-32.Google Scholar
Harley, C. K. (1999): «Cotton Textiles Prices Revisited: A Response to Cuenca Esteban». Economic History Review, 52, pp. 756-765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J. (1997): «Valuing the Effect of Regulation on New Services in Telecommunications». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics, pp. 1-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawke, G. R. (1970): Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales, 1840–1870. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Herranz-Loncan, A. (2006): «Railroad Impact in Backward Economies: Spain, 1850-1913». Journal of Economic History, 66, pp. 853-881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, C. T.Klenow, P. J. (2009): «Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, pp. 1403-1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, J. A.Skinner, J. S. (1985): «The Resolution of the Labor-Scarcity Paradox». Journal of Economic History, 45, pp. 513-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jara-Diaz, S. R. (1986): «On the Relation between Users’ Benefits and the Economic Effects of Transportation Activities». Journal of Regional Science, 26, pp. 379-391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerzmanowski, M. (2007): «Total Factor Productivity Differences: Appropriate Technology vs. Efficiency». European Economic Review, 51, pp. 2080-2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanefsky, J. F. (1979): «The Diffusion of Power Technology in British Industry». University of Exeter, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Knack, S.Keefer, P. (1995): «Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures». Economics and Politics, 7, pp. 207-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, O.Schon, L. (2007): Swedish Historical National Accounts, 1800-2000. Lund: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1994): «The Myth of Asia’s Miracle». Foreign Affairs, 73 (6), pp. 62-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S. S. (1971): Economic Growth of Nations. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lains, P. (2003): «Catching Up to the European Core: Portuguese Economic Growth, 1910-1990». Explorations in Economic History, 40, pp. 369-386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, D. S. (1969): The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G.; Bekar, C.Carlaw, K. (1998): «What Requires Explanation?», in E. Helpman (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 15-54.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (2000): «Some Macroeconomics for the 21st Century». Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (1), pp. 159-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (1987): «Growth and Slowdown in Advanced Capitalist Economies: Techniques of Quantitative Assessment». Journal of Economic Literature, 25, pp. 649-698.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (2003): The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, G. B. (2004): «Manufacturing and Technological Change», in R. Floud, and P. Johnson (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. C. O.; Feinstein, C. H.Odling-Smee, J. C. (1982): British Economic Growth, 1856-1973. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, P. D. (1972): «Social Rates of Return on American Railroads in the Nineteenth Century». Economic History Review, 25, pp. 471-488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. R.; Chambers, D.Crafts, N. (2009): «How Good Was the Profitability of British Railways, 1870-1912?». Warwick Economic Research Paper no. 859.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R.Wright, G. (1992): «The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: the Post-War Era in Historical Perspective». Journal of Economic Literature, 30, pp. 1931-1964.Google Scholar
Nickell, S. (2005): «What Has Happened to Unemployment in the OECD Since the 1980s?». Unpublished presentation to Work and Pensions Economics Group, HM Treasury, London.Google Scholar
Nickell, S.; Nicolitsas, D.Dryden, N. (1997): «What Makes Firms Perform Well?». European Economic Review, 41, pp. 783-796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoletti, G.Scarpetta, S. (2005): «Regulation and Economic Performance: Product Market Reforms and Productivity in the OECD». OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 460.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2004): «Schumpeterian Profits in the American Economy: Theory and Measurement». NBER Working Paper no. 10433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007): «Two Centuries of Productivity Growth in Computing». Journal of Economic History, 67, pp. 128-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (2005): Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliner, S. D.; Sichel, D. E.Stiroh, K. J. (2007): «Explaining a Productive Decade». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 81-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Mahony, M. (1999): Britain’s Productivity Performance, 1950-1996. London: NIESR.Google Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L.Roses, J. (2009): «The Sources of Long-Run Growth in Spain, 1850-2000». Journal of Economic History, 69, pp. 1063-1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997): «TFPG Controversies, Institutions and Economic Performance in East Asia». Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper no. 1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1993): «Idea Gaps and Object Gaps in Economic Development». Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, pp. 543-573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, N.; Sorgato, A.Toniolo, G. (1992): «Italian Historical Statistics, 1890-1990». University of Venice Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche no. 92-18.Google Scholar
Schon, L. (2004): «Total Factor Productivity Growth in Swedish Manufacturing in the Period 1870-2000», in S. Heikinnen, and J.-L. van Zanden (eds), Exploring Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers, pp. 273-297.Google Scholar
Schulze, M.-S. (2007): «Origins of Catch-up Failure: Comparative Productivity Growth in the Hapsburg Empire, 1870-1910». European Review of Economic History, 11, pp. 189-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1957): «Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function». Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, pp. 312-320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toniolo, G. (1998): «Europe’s Golden Age, 1950-73: Speculations from a Long-Run Perspective». Economic History Review, 51, pp. 252-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett, J. E. (1999): «The Solow Productivity Paradox: What do Computers do to Productivity?». Canadian Journal of Economics, 32, pp. 309-334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ark, B.; O’Mahony, M.Timmer, M. P. (2008): «The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes». Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, pp. 25-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D.Purushothaman, R. (2003): «Dreaming with BRICs: the Path to 2050». Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper no. 99.Google Scholar
Wolfl, A.; Wanner, I.; Kozluk, T.Nicoletti, G. (2009): «Ten Years of Product Market Reform in OECD Countries: Insights from a Revised PMR Indicator». OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 695.Google Scholar