Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:20:38.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Synthetic Vision of Joseph Schumpeter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Martin Kessler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eleven years after his death, economists (strangely enough, the only ones who seem to care) still ponder the paradoxes of Joseph A. Schumpeter. While the contributions of the late Lord Keynes, not without intriguing paradoxes of their own, are being rapidly assimilated into the “common sense” of statesmen, Schumpeter, the only other truly great economist the twentieth century has produced, exerted no appreciable influence over public policy. Apart from a few misunderstood cliches, such as “creative destruction,” “obsolescence of entrepreneurial function,” and so on, his ideas have generated no “school” among young intellectuals. Indeed, it is doubtful that they ever will, even though Schumpeter is a profound and honest thinker in the tradition of Marx, Weber, and Tawney grappling with one of the crucial problems of our age: the innovating and growth capacities of various social systems under an advanced industrial technology.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1961 , pp. 334 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Keynes, J. M., Essays in Persuasion (London, 1932), PrefaceGoogle Scholar.

2 Schumpeter, J. A., “The Explanation of the Business Cycle,” Economica, VII (12, 1927), 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Keynes, , Essays and Sketches in Biography (New York, 1956), p. 327Google Scholar.

4 The best biographical sketches are A. Smithies, “Memorial: J. A. Schumpeter, 1883–1950” and von Haberler, Gottfried, “J. A. Schumpeter, 1883–1950” in a collection of essays edited by Harris, S. E., Schumpeter, Social Scientist (Cambridge, 1951), pp. 11–23 and 24–47Google Scholar.

5 Cf. his stress on the superior political capacities of the aristocracy.

8 See especially his essay on Walras in Ten Great Economists (New York 1951)Google Scholar and the section on Walras in his History of Economic Analysis (New York, 1954)Google Scholar.

7 See the essays cited in note 4.

8 Smithies, ibid., p. 17.

9 Schumpeter, J. A., Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (Leipzig, 1912)Google Scholar; in English, The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge, 1934)Google Scholar. His first book was Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalokonomie (Leipzig, 1908)Google Scholar.

10 Wright, David McCord, “Schumpeter und Keynes” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv an der Universitdt Kiel, LXV, no. 2, 191Google Scholar.

11 Schumpeter, J. A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York, 1942)Google Scholar.

12 See Hansen, A., Full Recovery or Stagnation? (New York, 1937)Google Scholar, and Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles (New York, 1941)Google Scholar.

13 Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, p. 61.

14 A good exposition of Schumpeterian economics is contained in Clemence, Richard V. and Doody, Francis S., The Schumpeterian System (Cambridge, 1950)Google Scholar.

15 Schumpeter's model of “plausible capitalism” does not assume perfect competition.

16 Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, p. 82.

17 See Chapter IV, The Theory of Economic Development.

18 Schumpeter's, theory of business cycles is presented in Business Cycles, 2 vols. (New York, 1939)Google Scholar.

19 von Beckerath, H., “Joseph A. Schumpeter as Sociologist” in Schumpeter, Social Scientist, pp. 110–118Google Scholar.

20 Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, p. 82.

21 Ibid., p. 83.

22 Ibid., p. 167.

23 Ibid., p. 73.

24 Ibid.

25 Schumpeter, , “The Instability of Capitalism,” Economic Journal, XXXVIII (09, 1928), 375Google Scholar.

26 Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, p. 67.

27 Ibid., p. 122.

28 Ibid., p. 124.

29 Ibid., p. 127.

30 Ibid., p. 134.

31 Ibid., p. 136.

32 Ibid., p. 138.

33 Ibid., p. 139.

34 Ibid.

35 Rathenau, W., Die neue Wirtschaft (Berlin, 1919)Google Scholar, Der neue Staat (Berlin, 1919)Google Scholar, Die neue Gesellschaft (Berlin, 1919)Google Scholar.

36 Berle, A. A. and Means, G., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York, 1933)Google Scholar.

37 Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, p. 144.

38 Ibid., p. 145.

39 Ibid.

40 Ibid., p. 147.