No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Two principal facts dominate the history of Moscow in the second half of the fifteenth century: the winning of independence, and religious emancipation. On the one hand, Moscow shook off the secular yoke of the Tartars and became a State; on the other hand, the Russian Church withdrew from the guardianship of the mother Byzantine Church. Religious aspirations and the awakening of a national consciousness were then intimately bound together and strengthened each other by the interplay of their mutual influences. But, while the Moscow principality was consolidating itself and realizing its desire for political autonomy, the religious situation remained indecisive for a much longer time. The Russian soul felt itself abandoned and ill at ease with the ecclesiastical independence that came to it with the fall of Byzantium. Opposing currents divided popular opinion, and diverse influences sometimes had the most unexpected consequences. We have tried to unravel some of these currents and some of these influences in the pages that follow.
1 Letters of the staretz Philotheus to the Grand-Prince Vassili Ivanoviteh, published in the periodical Pravoslavny Sobecenik, 1863, I, p. 347.Google Scholar
2 Raeff, Marc, “An Early Theorist of Absolutism: Joseph of Volokolamsk,” in The American Slavic & East European Review, vol. 8, no. 2 (04 1949), pp. 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Pierling, P., La Russie et le Saint-Siège, t. I, 2nd ed., p. 187.Google Scholar
4 Herberstain, Sigismond, Return moscoriticarum commentarii (Basel, 1551), p. 65.Google Scholar
5 Akty istoricheski isdannye Archeographicheskoiu Komissieiu, I (St. Petersburg, 1841), no.43, p. 86.Google Scholar
6 Golubinski, E., Istoria Russkoi Tzerkri, II, 1 (Moscow, 1900), p. 511.Google Scholar
7 Akty sobrannye Archeographicheskoiu Expedizeiu, I (St. Petersburg, 1836), no. 80.Google Scholar
8 Volotzki, Joseph, Prosrietitel (Kazan, 1904), p. 45.Google Scholar
9 Letter of the bishop of Prokhor, Sara to the former bishop of Rostov, Josaphat, , published in the Chtenia (Moscow, 1847) no. 8.Google Scholar
10 Volotzki, Joseph, Prorietitel, p. 44.Google Scholar
11 Colophon of the 15th c. manuscript of the Bible of the Pogodin collection, according to the Catalogue of the Department of Manuscripts of the Synodal Library, by Gorski, and Nevostruev, , II (Moscow, 1859), p. 127.Google Scholar
12 Karamzin, , Istoria Gosudarstva Possiskago (St. Petersburg, 1892), no. 358.Google Scholar
13 The Slavonic translations of these works are given in the Catalogue Tzarsky (461). They are in a manuscript belonging to the Seminary of Vologda.
14 Volotzki, Joseph, Prosrietitel, p. 41,Google Scholar
15 Letter of Archbishop Gennadius to the Metropolitan Zosim, of 1490, published in the Akty sobrannye Archeographicheskoiu Expeditzieiu, I (St. Petersburg, 1836), no. 380, p. 479.Google Scholar
16 Annale of St. Sophia, and annale of the Resurrection Church, under the year 1505, in Polnoie sobranie Russkikh letopissei, VI, p. 49; VIII, p. 244.Google Scholar
17 Gorski, and Nevostruev, , op. cit., II (Moscow, 1859), p. 609.Google Scholar
18 Golubinski, E., Istoria Russkoi Tzerkri, II, 1 (Moscow, 1900), p. 684, no. 3.Google Scholar
19 Letter of Gennadius to Josephat, archbishop of Rostov, published in the Chtenia (Moscow, 1847), no. 8, p. 2.Google Scholar
20 Letter published by Khrushchev, in his Izsledovanie o sochineniakh Iosepha Sanina (St. Petersburg, 1868), p. 243.Google Scholar