Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:36:51.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lord Acton's Theory of Nationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Hector J. Massey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The philosophical framework for Lord Acton's theory of nationality, or to be more accurate his theory of multinationality, derives both from Aristotle and from Christian thinkers of the Middle Ages and the early modern period. In Aristotle he found the view that the nature of the state is to be a plurality. Aquinas gave him “a very large element of political liberalism,” while Leibnitz contributed the idea of development, particularly the notion that development involves continuity and progress. Combining these points of view, Acton embraced a patently individualistic position, believing firmly that only the individual man possesses moral and political rights. Classes, races and states are at best chance groupings, at worst tortuous human inventions, and consequently have no inherent rights. It is “easier to find people fit to govern themselves,” according to Acton, “than people fit to govern others.”

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 495 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in SirBarker, Ernest (ed.), “Introduction,” The Social Contract (London, 1960), p. viiiGoogle Scholar.

2 Additional mss. 4941, quoted in Himmelfarb, Gertrude, Lord Acton (Chicago, 1962), p. 173Google Scholar.

3 Acton, Lord, “Inaugural Lecture,” Essays on Freedom and Power (New York, 1955), p. 81Google Scholar.

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid., p. 72.

6 Acton, Lord, Rambler, 01, 1861, p. 199Google Scholar.

7 Acton, Lord, “The History of Freedom in Antiquity,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 72Google Scholar.

8 Acton, Lord, Renaissance to Revolution, Lectures on Modern History (New York, 1961), p. 51Google Scholar.

9 Quoted in Butterfield, Herbert, The Whig Interpretation of History, (London, 1963), p. 129Google Scholar.

10 Quoted in Fasnacht, G. E., Acton's Political Philosophy (London, 1952), p. 139Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., p. 137.

12 “Acton-Creighton Correspondence,” Essays on Freedom and Power, pp. 335–336.

13 Acton, Lord, ”Nationality,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 144Google Scholar.

14 Ibid., p. 145.

15 Ibid., p. 145.

16 Ibid., p. 146.

17 Ibid., p. 146.

18 Ibid., p. 147.

19 Ibid., p. 146.

20 Ibid., p. 148.

21 Ibid., p. 148.

22 Ibid., p. 148.

23 Ibid., p. 156.

24 Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government (London, 1962), pp. 359–360Google Scholar.

25 Ibid., p. 360.

26 Quoted in Acton, Lord, “Nationality,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 156Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., p. 161.

28 Ibid., p. 157.

29 Quoted in Fasnacht, , op. cit., p. 42Google Scholar.

30 Quoted in Kohn, Hans, Nationalism, Its Meaning and History, (Princeton, 1965) pp. 120–121Google Scholar.

31 Acton, Lord, “Nationality,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 158Google Scholar.

32 Ibid., p. 159.

33 Acton, Lord, “Nationality,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 160Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., p. 160.

35 Ibid., p. 160.

36 Ibid., p. 160.

37 Ibid., p. 160.

38 Ibid., p. 161.

39 Ibid., p. 161.

40 Ibid., p. 161.

41 Ibid., p. 161.

42 Mill, J. S., op. cit., p. 364Google Scholar.

43 Acton, Lord, “Nationality,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 163Google Scholar.

44 Ibid., p. 168.

45 Ibid., p. 168.

46 Ibid., p. 166.

47 Ibid., p. 167.

48 Additional mss. 4895, Cambridge University Library.

49 Acton, Lord, Lectures on Modern History, p. 314Google Scholar.

50 Acton, Lord, “Nationality,” Essays on Freedom and Power, p. 163–4Google Scholar.