Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:29:44.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critique of the Pro-Choice Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

William J. Voegeli Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The debate over abortion in America is at a standstill. The pro-life and pro-choice groups, having settled firmly on incompatible premises, have nothing to say to one another. Their “debate” is only “a battle of bumper stickers between people with their minds already made up.” More importantly, they have nothing to say to all the people in the middle who feel uncomfortable with both positions. If the crux of the abortion issue is choosing between being pro-life and pro-choice, then the undecided citizen who sincerely wants his country to act rightly has the dismal opportunity of deciding whether to be anti-choice or anti-life.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 1981 , pp. 560 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Abortion: An American Dilemma,” Newsweek, 5 June 1978, p. 47.

2 Garn, Jake, “Debating Abortion,” National Review, 11 11 1977, p. 1299Google Scholar.

3 Rockefeller, John D. III, “No Retreat on Abortion,” Newsweek, 21 06 1976, p. 11Google Scholar. See also, “Abortion and the Law –II,” New Republic, 22 June 1974, pp. 5–6.

4 Rockefeller, , “No Retreat on Abortion,” p. 11Google Scholar.

5 “Abortion and the Law,” New Republic, 18 May 1974, p. 33.

6 Jaffa, Harry V., Crisis of the House Divided (Garden City, New York, 1959), p. 33Google Scholar.

7 The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, ed. Basler, Roy P. (New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1953), II: 461Google Scholar.

8 Jaffa, , Divided House, p. 438Google Scholar.

9 Collected Works of Lincoln, II: 266.

10 Jaffa, , Divided House, pp. 29–30Google Scholar.

11 Collected Works of Lincoln, III: 12.

12 Ibid., II: 265.

13 Ibid., pp. 493–94.

14 Ibid., p. 266.

15 Ibid., p. 492.

16 Ibid.

17 Wertheimer, Roger, “Understanding the Abortion Argument,” in The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion, eds. Cohen, Marshall, Nagel, Thomas, and Scanlon, Thomas (Princeton, 1974)Google Scholar.

18 Collected Works of Lincoln, II: 265.

19 Wertheimer, , “Understanding the Abortion Argument,” p. 41Google Scholar.

20 Ibid., pp. 42–49.

21 Ibid., p. 50.

22 Callahan, Daniel, Abortion: Law, Choice, and Morality (New York, 1970), p. 4Google Scholar.

23 Wertheimer, , “Understanding the Abortion Argument,” pp. 50–51Google Scholar.