Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:20:05.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technical efficiency of organic pasture farming in Germany: The role of location economics and of specific knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2011

S. Lakner ,
S. von Cramon-Taubadel  and
B. Brümmer
S. Lakner*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.
S. von Cramon-Taubadel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.
B. Brümmer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze the efficiency of organic pasture farming in Germany using data from 1994/95 to 2005/06. Five inputs and one output are analyzed by means of a stochastic frontier production function, allowing for heteroscedasticity and technical effects. Five sets of possible determinants of technical efficiency are considered in the model. These include: (1) farm structure and resources; (2) human capital and management capacities; (3) institutional choice; and (4) subsidies. To these factors that are commonly included in technical effects models, we add (5) a set of variables that capture localization and urbanization economies such as the share of organic farms in a region and the regional share of votes for the Green Party in recent elections. These regional effects are found to have a significant impact on the technical efficiency of organic farms. The evolution of efficiency on farms that are converting from conventional to organic farming is also analyzed.

Keywords

efficiency analysisorganic farminglocation economicsspecific knowledge
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 228 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Organic Food Industry Federation 2011. Zahlen, Daten, Fakten: Die Bio-Branche 2011. Document yearly updated by the Organic Food Industry Federation (Bund Ökologische Lebensmittelwirtschaft (BÖLW)), Berlin, Germany. Available at Web site: http://www.boelw.de/zdf.html (accessed March 15, 2011).Google Scholar
2Research Institute of Organic Agriculture 2010. Development of organic agricultural land, share of total agricultural land, organic operators in Europe 2003–2009. Database continually updated by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland. Available at Web site: http://www.organic-europe.net (accessed July 5, 2010).Google Scholar
3Heß, J. 1997. Systemimmanenter Zwang zu möglichst geschlossenen Nährstoffkreisläufen. Ökologie und Landbau 103:10–13.Google Scholar
4Kumbhakar, S.C., Tsionas, E.G., and Sipiläinen, T. 2009. Joint estimation of technology choice and technical efficiency: an application to organic and conventional dairy farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis 31:151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Mayen, C.D., Balagtas, J.V., and Alexander, C.E. 2009. Vertical economies of scope in dairy farming. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industry Organization 7(1). Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jafio/vol7/iss1/art8 (accessed March 14, 2011).Google Scholar
6Nieberg, H. 2001. Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau: Wer profitiert? Ökologie und Landbau 118:6–9.Google Scholar
7Gerber, A., Hoffmann, V., and Klügler, M. 1996. Das Wissenssystem im ökologischen Landbau in Deutschland - zur Entstehung und Weitergabe von Wissen im Diffusionsprozess. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 74:591–627.Google Scholar
8Bichler, B., Lippert, C., Häring, A., and Dabbert, S. 2005. Die Bestimmungsgründe der räumlichen Verteilung des ökologischen Landbaus in Deutschland. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 83:50–75.Google Scholar
9Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20:325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Brümmer, B. and Loy, J.-P. 2000. The technical efficiency impact of farm credit programmes: a case study of northern Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53:405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Balmann, A. and Czasch, B. 2001. Zur Effizienz landwirtschaftlicher Unternehmen in Brandenburg—Eine Data Envelopment Analysis. Agrarwirtschaft 50:198–203.Google Scholar
12Curtiss, J. 2002. Efficiency and Structural Changes in Transition—A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Czech Crop Production. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
13Davidova, S. and Latruffe, L. 2007. Relationships between technical efficiency and financial management for Czech Republic farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics 58:269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Mayen, C.D., Balagtas, J.V., and Alexander, C.E. 2010. Technology adoption and technical efficiency: organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92(1):181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Oude Lansink, A., Pietola, K., and Bäckman, S. 2002. Efficiency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland 1994–1997. European Review of Agricultural Economics 29:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Tzouvelekas, V., Pantzios, C.J., and Fotopoulos, C. 2001. Technical efficiency of alternative farming systems: the case of Greek organic and conventional olive-growing farms. Food Policy 26:549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Sipiläinen, T. and Oude Lansink, A. 2005. Learning in organic farming—an application on Finnish dairy farms. Contributed paper to the XI. EAAE Congress ‘The Future of Rural Europe in the Global Agri-Food System’ 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 1–22. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/24493 (accessed June 7, 2011).Google Scholar
18Gubi, G. 2006. Analyse der erfolgs- und effizienzbestimmenden Faktoren im ökologischen Landbaus. PhD thesis, Institute for Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany. Available at Web site: http://eldiss.uni-kiel.de/macau/receive/dissertation_diss_00001845 (accessed June 7, 2011).Google Scholar
19Lohr, L. and Park, T. 2006. Technical effects of U.S. organic farmers: the complementary roles of soil management techniques and farm experience. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35:327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Francksen, T., Gubi, G., and Latacz-Lohmann, U. 2007. Empirische Untersuchungen zum optimalen Spezialisierungsgrad ökologisch wirtschaftender Marktfruchtbetriebe. Agrarwirtschaft 56:187–200.Google Scholar
21Schulze Pals, L. 1994. Ökonomische Analyse der Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministierum für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Series A, Vol. 436. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
22Destatis 2006. Statistical Yearbook Agriculture 2006. Federal Statistical Office Germany (Destatis), Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
23Destatis 2007. Regional database Germany—Online database. Federal Statistical Office Germany (Destatis), Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
24Burton, M., Rigby, D., and Young, T. 1999. Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50:47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Padel, S. 2001a. Conversion to organic farming: a typical example of the diffusion of innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41:40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Padel, S. 2001b. Conversion to organic milk production: the change process and farmers’ information needs. PhD thesis, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales.Google Scholar
27Ilbery, B., Holloway, L., and Arber, R. 1999. The geography of organic farming in England and Wales in the 1990s. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 90:285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Frederiksen, P. and Langer, V. 2004. Localization and concentration of organic farming in the 1990s – the Danish Case. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95(5):539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Tveteras, R. and Battese, G.E. 2006. Agglomeration externalities, productivity and technical efficiency. Journal of Regional Science 46:605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Jaenicke, E.C., Goetz, S.J., Wu, P.C., and Dimitri, C. 2009. Identifying and measuring the effect of firm clusters among certified organic processors and handlers. Contributed paper at the Annual Meeting of Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2009, AAEA, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/49205 (accessed March 15, 2011).Google Scholar
31Larue, S. and Latruffe, L. 2008. Agglomeration externalities and technical efficiency in pig production. Contributed paper at the 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists – EAAE 2008, Ghent, Belgium. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/44272 (accessed June 7, 2011).Google Scholar
32Nivievskiy, O. 2009. Price support, efficiency and technology change of Ukrainian dairy farms: Spatial dependence in the components of productivity growth. Contributed paper at the IAAE 2009 Conference, Beijing, China. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/51403 (accessed June 7, 2011).Google Scholar
33Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
34Maier, G. and Tödtling, F. 1995. Regional und Stadtökonomik—Standorttheorie und Raumstruktur, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
35Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S., Prasada, , O'Donnell, C.J., and Battese, G.E. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
36Kumbhakar, S. and Lovell, K.C.A. 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. University Press, Cambridge, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Aigner, D., Lovell, K.C.A., and Schmidt, P. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Meeusen, W. and van den Broek, J. 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18:435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Jondrow, J., Lovell, K.C.A., Materov, I.S., and Schmidt, P. 1982. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19:233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Caudill, S.B., Ford, J.M., and Gropper, D.M. 1995. Frontier estimation and firm specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13:105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P.J. 1990. Finding Groups in Data—An Introduction into Cluster Analysis. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
42Lakner, S. 2010. Effizienzanalyse im ökologischen Landbau - Bestandsaufnahme, empirische Analyse und agrarpolitische Schlussfolgerungen. PhD thesis, Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany. Available at Web site: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2010/lakner/ (accessed July 15, 2010).Google Scholar
43Offermann, F. and Nieberg, H. 2001. Wirtschaftliche Situation ökologischer Betriebe in ausgewählten Ländern Europas: Stand, Entwicklung und wichtige Einflussfaktoren. Agrarwirtschaft 50:421–427.Google Scholar
44Karagiannias, G., Salhofer, K., and Sinabell, F. 2006. Technical efficiency of conventional and organic farms: some evidence for milk production. Contributed paper at the 16 Conference of the Austrian Society of Agricultural Economics ‘Ländliche Betriebe und Agrarökonomie auf neuen Pfaden’. Wien, Austria.Google Scholar
45Leibenstein, H. 1966. Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency. American Economic Review 56:392–415.Google Scholar
46Giannakas, K., Schones, R., and Tzouvelekas, V. 2001. Technical efficiency, technological change and output growth of wheat farms in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 49:135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47McCloud, N. and Kumbhakar, S.C. 2007. Does subsidy drive productivity? A cross-country analysis of Nordic Dairy Farms. In Chib, S., Koop, G., and Griffiths, B. (eds). Advances in Econometrics: Bayesian Econometrics. Emerald Books, Bingley, England.Google Scholar
48Hemme, T., Deeken, E., and Faßbender, W. 2004. Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ökologischen Milchproduktion und Verarbeitung in Deutschland, Report No 02OE059 at the von Thünen Institute, Institute for farm economics, Braunschweig, Germany. Available at Web site: http://orgprints.org/10743/ (accessed June 7, 2011).Google Scholar
49Brümmer, B. 2001. Stochastic Frontier Analysis using SFAMB for Ox, Manual at the Institute for Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
50Kodde, D.A. and Palm, F.C. 1986. Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica 54:1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Wilson, P., Hadley, D., and Asby, C. 2001. The influence of management characteristics on the technical efficiency of wheat farmers in Eastern England. Agricultural Economics 24:329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Nivievskiy, O., Brümmer, B., and von Cramon-Taubadel, S. 2010. A Note on Technical Efficiency, Productivity Growth and Competitiveness. Contributed paper at the Joint Annual Meeting of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA), Denver, Colorado, USA. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/61759 (accessed March 10, 2011).Google Scholar
53Darnhofer, I., Eder, M., Schmid, J., and Schneeberger, W. 2005. Ausstieg aus der ÖPUL- Maßnahme biologische Wirtschaftsweise. In Heß, J. and Rahman, G. (eds).Proceedings of the 8th Scientific Conference for Organic Farming ‘Ende der Nische’. Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin. p. 467–470.Google Scholar
54Kantelhardt, J., Eckstein, K., and Hoffmann, H. 2009. Assessing programmes for the provision of agri-environmental services – An efficiency analysis realized in Southern Germany. Contributed paper at the IAAE 2009 Conference, Beijing, China. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/51688 (accessed June 8, 2011).Google Scholar
55Lohr, L. and Salomonsson, L. 2000. Conversion subsidies for organic production: results from Sweden and lessons for the United States. Agricultural Economics 22:133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar