Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:06:59.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social, economic and environmental impacts of organic cotton production on the livelihood of smallholder farmers in Odisha, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

Christine Altenbuchner*
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan Vogel
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Manuela Larcher
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Cotton is an important source of income for smallholder farmers in India, usually grown very intensively. To counteract negative impacts of cotton cultivation in India, such as environmental degradation and financial dependency due to high input costs, organic cotton cultivation is being promoted by non-governmental organizations in the country. This study examines how the conversion to organic cotton cultivation influences the livelihood of smallholder farmers in rural India. Interviews with organic farmers were conducted in Odisha, India, complemented by expert interviews and observations in the field. Results show that farmers profit from organic agriculture, mainly due to soil improvements, through reduced exposure to toxic chemicals and lower input costs, which in turn reduces dependency on money lenders. Organic agriculture enables smallholder farmers in the study region to improve their livelihood by providing access to training and by organizing in groups. Important social impacts identified in this study were capacity building and strengthened communities, through training and institution building. However, a higher workload, due to the higher work intensity of organic farming practices, was also observed, with this impacting women more than men. Environmental conditions and gender aspects still remain challenging.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adanacioglu, H. and Olgun, A. 2012. Evaluation of the efficiency of organic cotton farmers: A case study from turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18:418428.Google Scholar
Altenbuchner, C., Larcher, M., and Vogel, S. 2014. The impact of organic cotton cultivation on the livelihood of smallholder farmers in Meatu district, Tanzania: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 115.Google Scholar
Altieri, M.A. 2002. Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atteslander, P. 2003. Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. 10th ed. Walther de Gruyter Studienbuch, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bachmann, F. 2012. Potential and limitations of organic and fair trade cotton for improving livelihoods of smallholders: evidence from Central Asia. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27(02):138147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baffes, J. 2004. Cotton: Market Setting, Trade Policies, and Issues. Worldbank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balarajan, Y., Selvaraj, S. and Subramanian, S.V. 2011. Health care and equity in India. The Lancet 377:505515.Google Scholar
Bello, W.B. 2008. Problems and prospect of organic farming in developing countries. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management 1:3643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H.R. 2002. Research Methods in Anthropology-Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 4th ed. AltaMira Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Branson, A. and Sood, D. 2015. India—Cotton and Products Annual 2015. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service—GAIN Global Agricultural Information Network, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Das, B. and Tarai, D. 2011. Decision-making and fertility behaviour: A comparative analysis of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe women in Odisha. Social Change 41:233249.Google Scholar
Directorate of Agriculture and Food production Odisha. 2013. Position Paper for State Level Cotton Development Meeting. Directorate of Agriculture & Food production and Government of Odisha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.Google Scholar
Eyhorn, F. 2007. Organic Farming for Sustainable Livelihoods in Developing Countries?: the Case of Cotton in India. vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Eyhorn, F., Mäder, P. and Ramakrishnan, M. 2005a. The Impact of Organic Cotton Farming on the Livelihoods of Smallholders—Evidence from the Maikaal bioRe Project in Central India. FiBL, Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Eyhorn, F., Ratter, S.G., and Ramakrishnan, M. 2005b. Organic Cotton Crop Guide. A Manual for Practitioners in the Tropics. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Eyhorn, F., Ramakrishnan, M. and Mader, P. 2007. The viability of cotton-based organic farming systems in India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 5:2538.Google Scholar
Farnworth, C.R. and Hutchings, J. 2009. Organic Agriculture and Women's Empowerment. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Ferringo, S., Ratter, S.G., Ton, P., Vodouhe, D.S., Williamson, S. and Wilson, J. 2005. Organic Cotton: A New Development Path for African Smallholders? International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Google Scholar
Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. SAGE Publications, London.Google Scholar
Gandhi, V.P. and Zhou, Z. 2014. Food demand and the food security challenge with rapid economic growth in the emerging economies of India and China. Food Research International 63:108124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaurav, S. and Mishra, S. 2012. To Bt or not to Bt? Risk and Uncertainty Considerations in Technology Assessment. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai.Google Scholar
Giné, X. 2011. Access to capital in rural Thailand: An estimated model of formal vs. informal credit. Journal of Development Economics 96:1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovannucci, D. 2005. Organic Agriculture and Poverty Reduction in Asia: China and India Focus. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome.Google Scholar
Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. 2009. Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. 3th ed. VS Verlag Für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
Gould, F., Amasino, R.M., Brossard, D., Buell, C.R., Dixon, R.A., Falck-Zepeda, J.B., Gallo, M.A., Giller, K., Glenna, L.L., Griffin, T.S., Hamaker, B.R., Kareiva, P.M., Magraw, D., Mallory-Smith, C., Pixley, K., Ransom, E.P., Rodemeyer, M., Stelly, D.M., Stewart, C.N. and Whitaker, R. 2016. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine & The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Government of Odisha. 2011. District wise Population as per 2011 Census. ST & SC Development & Welfare Department and Government of Odisha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.Google Scholar
Government of Odisha. 2013. Annual Report 2012–13—ST & SC Development. Minorities & Backward Classes Welfare Department, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.Google Scholar
Hofs, J.L., Fok, M., and Vaissayre, M. 2006. Impact of Bt cotton adoption on pesticide use by smallholders: A 2-year survey in Makhathini Flats (South Africa). Crop Protection 25(9):984988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IFAD. 2005. Organic Agriculture and Poverty Reduction in Asia: China and India Focus. Report No. 1664. IFAD—International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome.Google Scholar
IFOAM. 2014. Principles of Organic Agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.ifoam.org/en/organic-landmarks/principles-organic-agriculture (verified 9 June 2016).Google Scholar
Jabbar, M.A., Ehui, S.K. and Von Kaufmann, R. 2002. Supply and demand for livestock credit in sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons for designing new credit schemes. World Development 30:10291042.Google Scholar
Jawtusch, J., Oehen, B. and Niggli, U. 2011. Environmental, Social, and Economic Impacts of Sustainability Certification in Agricultural Sector: The Current State of Empirical Research. In Willer, H. and Kilcher, L. (eds.). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2011. IFOAM and FiBL, Bonn, Germany/Frick, Switzerland. pp. 8891.Google Scholar
Khandker, S.R., and Faruqee, R.R. 2003. The impact of farm credit in Pakistan. Agricultural Economics 28:197213.Google Scholar
Kuckartz, U. 2007. Einführung in die Computergestützte Analyse Qualitativer Daten. 2nd ed. VS Verlag Für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
Kumar, K., Choudhary, P.R., Sarangi, S., Mishra, P., and Behera, S. 2005. A Socio-Economic and Legal Study of Scheduled Tribes’ Land in Orissa. World Bank, Washington.Google Scholar
Lakerveld, R.P., Lele, S., Crane, T.A., Fortuin, K.P.J. and Springate-Baginski, O. 2015. The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosystem Services 14:5666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamnek, S. 2005. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Lehrbuch. Beltz PVU, Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Lyons, K., and Burch, D. 2007. Socio-Economic Effects of Organic Agriculture in Africa. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Mäder, P., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P. and Niggli, U. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:16941697.Google Scholar
Makita, R. 2012. Fair Trade and organic initiatives confronted with Bt cotton in Andhra Pradesh, India: A paradox. Geoforum 43:12321241.Google Scholar
Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G. and Swift, M.J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504509.Google Scholar
Ministry of Home Affairs. 2011. Indian National Census 2011. Census Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Mitra, A. 2008. The status of women among the scheduled tribes in India. The Journal of Socio-Economics 37:12021217.Google Scholar
Mohanty, B.B. 2001. Land Distribution Among Scheduled Castes and Tribes. Economic and Political Weekly. p. 38573868.Google Scholar
Mohan, K.S., Ravi, K.C., Suresh, P.J., Sumerford, D. and Head, G.P. 2015. Field resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis protein Cry1Ac expressed in Bollgard® hybrid cotton in pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders), populations in India. Pest Management Science 72(4):738746.Google Scholar
Monga, D. 2008. Problems and Prospects of Cultivation of Bt Hybrids in North Indian Cotton Zone. Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra.Google Scholar
NSSO. 2014. Key Indicators of Debt and Investment in India—NSS 70th Round 2013. National Sample Survey Office, Government of India, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Oberson, A., Besson, J.M., Maire, N. and Sticher, H. 1996. Microbiological processes in soil organic phosphorus transformations in conventional and biological cropping systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils 21:138148.Google Scholar
Oehl, F., Sieverding, E., Ineichen, K., Mäder, P., Boller, T., and Wiemken, A. 2003. Impact of land use intensity on the species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystems of Central Europe. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69:28162824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padel, S. 2001. Conversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41:4061.Google Scholar
Panneerselvam, P., Halberg, N., Vaarst, M. and Hermansen, J.E. 2012. Indian farmers’ experience with and perceptions of organic farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:157169.Google Scholar
Patil, S., Reidsma, P., Shah, P., Purushothaman, S. and Wolf, J. 2014. Comparing conventional and organic agriculture in Karnataka, India: Where and when can organic farming be sustainable? Land Use Policy 37:4051.Google Scholar
Pemsl, D., Waibel, H. and Gutierrez, A.P. 2005. Why do some Bt-cotton farmers in China continue to use high levels of pesticides? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 3(1):4456.Google Scholar
Planning Commission of India. 2013. Press Note on Poverty Estimates 2011–12. Planning Commission of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Rajendran, T.P. 2004. Organic Cotton Cultivation—a Pragmatic Approach for Resource Poor and Market-Challenged Farmers. CICR Regional Station, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.Google Scholar
Ray, S.C. and Ghose, A. 2014. Production efficiency in Indian agriculture: An assessment of the post green revolution years. Omega 44:5869.Google Scholar
Rieple, A. and Singh, R. 2010. A value chain analysis of the organic cotton industry: The case of UK retailers and Indian suppliers. Ecological Economics 69:22922302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scialabba, N.E.-H. 2007. Organic Agriculture and Food Security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.Google Scholar
Sharma, S.K. and Bugalya, K. 2014. Competitiveness of Indian agriculture sector: A case study of cotton crop. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 133:320335.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 2001. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 2nd ed. Sage, London, UK.Google Scholar
Singh, R.B. 2000. Environmental consequences of agricultural development: a case study from the Green Revolution state of Haryana. India: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 82:97103.Google Scholar
Soltani, S., Azadi, H., Mahmoudi, H. and Witlox, F. 2014. Organic agriculture in Iran: farmers’ barriers to and factors influencing adoption. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 29:126134.Google Scholar
Stone, G.D. 2012. Constructing facts Bt cotton narratives in India. Economic and Political Weekly 47:6270.Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. and Qaim, M. 2009. Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India. World Development 37:256267.Google Scholar
Textile Exchange. 2013. Organic Cotton Report 2013 – From Farm to Market. Textile Exchange, London, UK.Google Scholar
Textile Exchange. 2016. Organic Cotton Market Report 2016. Textile Exchange, London, UK.Google Scholar
The Cotton Corporation of India. 2011. National Cotton Scenario—India's Share in World. The Cotton Corporation of India, Bengaluru, Karnataka.Google Scholar
Thomas, D., Sarangi, B.L., Garg, A., Ahuja, A., Meherda, P., Karthikeyan, S.R., Joddar, P., Kar, R., Pattnaik, J., Druvasula, R., and Dembo Rath, A. 2015. Closing the health and nutrition gap in Odisha, India: A case study of how transforming the health system is achieving greater equity. Social Science & Medicine 145:154162.Google Scholar
Tongco, M.D.C. 2007. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 5:147158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, N. 2013. Annual Report on Cotton. Programme under Mini Mission II—Technology Mission on Cotton during 2012–13. Subject Matter Specialist—SMS Cotton, Bhawanipatna, Odisha.Google Scholar
USDA. 2016. Cotton: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Walaga, C. and Hauser, M. 2005. Achieving household food security through organic agriculture? Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXI(3):6584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, O., Ashby, J. and Pretty, J. 2005. Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development 33: 17831799.Google Scholar
Willer, H., Yussefi-Menzler, M. and Sorensen, N. 2008. The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2008. IFOAM and FiBL, Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
World Food Program and Indian Institute of Human Development. 2008. Food Security Atlas of Rural Orissa. Indian Institute of Human Development, New Delhi.Google Scholar