Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:32:11.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon/Tree-Ring Calibration, Solar Activity, and Upwelling of Ocean Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

F B Knox  and
B G McFadgen
F B Knox
Affiliation:
900 Ohariu Valley Road, R.D., Johnsonville, Wellington, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
B G McFadgen
Affiliation:
900 Ohariu Valley Road, R.D., Johnsonville, Wellington, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Least-squares fitted smooth curves to radiocarbon versus tree-ring calibration data for the period AD 1140 to 1950 are compared with climatic warming and cooling of the North Atlantic (Little Ice Age), and with recorded sunspot numbers over the period AD 1670 to 1950.

Calibration curves from different parts of the globe are not identical, and appear to be determined by a combination of variable solar activity and variable oceanic upwelling of 14C-depleted water, with the variable upwelling itself partly determined by solar activity.

Type
Part II
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 18th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2), Conference Editors: Nancy Beavan Athfield, Rodger J Sparks , 2004 , pp. 987 - 995
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Damon, PE, Eastoe, CJ, Hughes, MK, Kalin, RM, Long, A, Peristykh, AN. 1998. Secular variation of Δ14C during the medieval solar maximum: a progress report. Radiocarbon 40(1):343–50.Google Scholar
Foukal, P. 2003. Can slow variations in solar luminosity provide missing link between the sun and climate. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 84(22):205, 208.Google Scholar
Jaeger, JC. 1951. An Introduction to Applied Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. §31:76–82.Google Scholar
Knox, FB, McFadgen, BG. 2001. Least-squares fitting smooth curves to decadal radiocarbon calibration data from AD 1145 to AD 1945. Radiocarbon 43(1):87–118.Google Scholar
Lal, D. 1992. Expected secular variations in the global terrestrial production rate of radiocarbon. NATO ASI Series 12:113–26.Google Scholar
Lassey, K, Manning, MR, O'Brien, BJ. 1990. An overview of oceanic radiocarbon: its inventory and dynamics. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences 3(2&3):117–46.Google Scholar
Lassey, K, Enting, IG, Trudinger, CM. 1996. The earth's radiocarbon budget. Tellus 48B:487–501.Google Scholar
Masarik, J, Beer, J. 1999. Simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic nuclide production in the earth's atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(D10): 12,099–111.Google Scholar
Royal Greenwich Observatory. Sunspot Record 1874–2004. Space Science Center (NASA). Solar Physics Data. The Sunspot Cycle. Monthly Averages. http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/greenwch_spot_num.txt.Google Scholar
Rigozo, NR, Echer, E, Vieira, LEA, Nordemann, DJR. 2001. Reconstruction of Wolf sunspot numbers on the basis of spectral characteristics and estimates of associated radio flux and solar wind parameters for the last millennium. Solar Physics 203:179–91.Google Scholar
Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC). Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium. Sunspot Archive. Yearly Sunspot Number. http://sidc.oma.be/DATA/yearssn.dat.Google Scholar
Snedecor, GW, Cochran, WG. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th edition. Ames: Iowa State University Press. 593 p.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF. 1993. Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):137–89.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Braziunas, TF. 1998. High-precision radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarbon 40(3):1127–51.Google Scholar