Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:35:32.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Fields and Disks in Star-forming Regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

C.M. Wright ,
D.K. Aitken ,
C.H. Smith  and
P.F. Roche
C.M. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, ACT 2600
D.K. Aitken
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, ACT 2600
C.H. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, ACT 2600
P.F. Roche
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The star-formation process is an outstanding and largely unsolved problem in astrophysics. The role of magnetic fields is unclear but is widely considered to be important at all stages of protostellar evolution, from cloud collapse to ZAMS. For example, in some hydromagnetic models, the field may assist in removing angular momentum, thereby driving accretion and perhaps bipolar outflows.

Spectropolarimetry between 8 and 13μm provides information on the direction of the transverse component of a magnetic field through the alignment of dust grains. We present results of 8–13μm spectropolarimetric observations of a number of bipolar molecular outflow sources, and compare the field directions observed with the axes of the outflows and putative disk-like structures observed to be associated with some of the objects. There is a strong correlation, though so far with limited statistics, between the magnetic field and disk orientations. We compare our results with magnetic field configurations predicted by current models for hydromagnetically driven winds from the disks around Young Stellar Objects (YSOs). Our results appear to argue against the Pudritz and Norman model and instead seem to support the Uchida and Shibata model.

Type
Galactic and Stellar
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , 1993 , pp. 247 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, D.K., 1989, Proc. 22nd Eslab Conf. on Infrared Spectroscopy in Astronomy, Kaldeich, B.H. (ed), ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, p. 99.Google Scholar
Aitken, D.K., 1992, Aust. J. Phys., 45, 569.Google Scholar
Aitken, D.K., Bailey, J.A., Roche, P.F. and Hough, J.H., 1985, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 215, 813.Google Scholar
Aitken, D.K., Wright, C.M., Smith, C.H. and Roche, P.F., 1992, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
Bastien, P. and Menard, F., 1988, Astrophys. J., 326, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastien, P. and Menard, F., 1990, Astrophys. J., 364, 232.Google Scholar
Davis, L. and Greenstein, J.L., 1951, Astrophys. J., 114, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonatas, D.P., Engargiola, G.A., Hildebrand, R.H., Platt, S.R., Wu, X.D., Davidson, J.A., Novak, G., Aitken, D.K. and Smith, C., 1990, Astrophys. J., 357, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lada, C.J., 1985, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 23, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, R.V.E., Berk, H.L. and Contopoulos, J., 1991, Astrophys. J., 379, 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P.G., 1975, Astrophys. J., 202, 393.Google Scholar
Minchin, N.R., Hough, J.H., Burton, M.G. and Yamashita, T., 1991, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 251, 522.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G.F., Maillard, J.P. and Hasegawa, T.I., 1991, Astrophys. J., 371, 342.Google Scholar
Pudritz, R.E., 1985, Astrophys. J., 293, 216.Google Scholar
Pudritz, R.E. and Norman, C.A., 1983, Astrophys. J., 274, 677.Google Scholar
Pudritz, R.E. and Norman, C.A., 1986, Astrophys. J., 301, 571.Google Scholar
Pudritz, R.E. and Silk, J., 1987, Astrophys. J., 316, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, L.F., 1988, in Galactic and Extragalactic Star Formation,Pudritz, R.E. and Fich, M. (eds), NATO ASI Series, Kluwer, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandell, G., Aspin, C., Duncan, W.D., Robson, E.I. and Dent, W.R.F., 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 232, 347.Google Scholar
Schulz, A., Black, J.H., Lada, C.J., Ulich, B.L., Martin, R.N., Snell, R.L. and Erickson, N.J., 1989, Astrophys. J., 341, 288.Google Scholar
Scoville, N.Z., Sargent, A.I., Sanders, D.B., Claussen, M.J., Masson, C.R., Lo, K.Y. and Phillips, T.G., 1986, Astrophys. J., 303, 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, F.H., Lizano, S., Roden, S.P. and Najita, J., 1988, Astrophys. J., 328, L19.Google Scholar
Snell, R.L., 1989, in Structure and Dynamics of the ISM, IAU Colloq. 120, Tenorio-Tagle, G., et al. (eds), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 231.Google Scholar
Strom, S.E., Strom, K.M. and Edwards, S., 1988, in Galactic and Extragalactic Star Formation, Pudritz, R.E. and Fich, M. (eds), NATO ASI Series, Kluwer, p. 97.Google Scholar
Torrelles, J.M., Anglada, G., Rodriguez, L.F., Canto, J. and Barral, J.F., 1987, Astron. Astrophys., 177, 171.Google Scholar
Uchida, Y. and Shibata, K., 1985, Pubs. Astr. Soc. Japan, 37, 515.Google Scholar
Verdes-Montenegro, L., Gomez, J.F., Torrelles, J.M., Anglada, G., Estalella, R. and Lopez, R., 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 244, 84.Google Scholar
Vishniac, E.T., Jin, L. and Diamond, P., 1990, Astrophys. J., 365, 648.Google Scholar