Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:14:05.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Working with psychiatric problems in probation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Keith J. B. Rix*
Affiliation:
St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent public concern about prisoners with psychiatric disorder, the deliberations of the Department of Health and Home Office Review of Health and Social Services for Mentally Disordered Offenders (the Reed Review) and the allocation by HM Government of funds for magistrates' courts to pay for duty psychiatrist schemes like the experimental scheme at Clerkenwell Magistrates' Court (James & Hamilton, 1991) are raising the profile of the mentally disordered offender and focusing attention on a group of people not only handicapped by mental disorder but also caught up in the criminal process. Probation officers have a key role in the care of many mentally disordered offenders and in the recent Home Office circular (1990) Provision for Mentally Disordered Offenders a reference is made to two courses for probation officers run by the Regional Staff Development Organisation for the Northern Region of the Probation Service. These courses are ‘Working with High Risk Offenders’ and ‘Working with Psychiatric Problems in Probation’. The former is run by Professor Herschel Prins and the latter by me. Judged by the number of applications, these are the two most popular courses run by RSD, but, as part of the process of evolving training to local probation areas, RSD closed in November 1991 and it has now organised its last course ‘Working with Psychiatric Problems in Probation’. This therefore seems an opportune time to describe the aims, format and evolution of the course and promote discussion concerning its implications for psychiatrists.

Type
Innovations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992

References

Foulds, G. A. & Bedford, A. (1975) Hierarchy of classes of personal illness. Psychological Medicine, 6, 181192.Google Scholar
Hajioff, J. (1989) Managing mentally abnormal offenders. Psychiatric Bulletin, 13, 480481.Google Scholar
Hall Williams, J. E. (1980) Legal views of psychiatric evidence. Medicine, Science and the Law, 20, 276282.Google Scholar
Home Office (1990) Provision for Mentally Abnormal Offenders. Home Office circular number 66/90.Google Scholar
James, D. J. & Hamilton, L. W. (1991) The Clerkenwell scheme: Assessing efficacy and cost of a psychiatric liaison service to a magistrates' court. British Medical Journal, 303, 282285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.