Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:47:14.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Not to Identify Innate Behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Dennis M. Senchuk*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Konrad Lorenz suggests that adequate grounds for classifying some behaviors as innate are to be found in the results of what he calls “the deprivation experiment“: ”… the experiment of withholding from the young organism information concerning certain well-defined givens of its natural environment.” (Lorenz 1965, p. 83). Thus, a stickleback fish is deprived of the information that its rival has a red belly. The stickleback is then confronted, for the first time, with a red-bellied rival (or a red-bellied dummy). If that stickleback responds with species-typical rival-fighting behavior, then (according to Lorenz) the experiment has established that the stickleback possesses certain innate information about its natural environment. On the other hand, should the stickleback fail to respond in this way, Lorenz tells us that ”…we should not be justified in asserting that this response is normally dependent on learning.

Type
Part III. Psychology
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1986

References

Dewey, John. (1896). “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology.” Psychology Review III: 357370. (As reprinted in The Early Works of John Dewey 1882-1898 Volume 5. (ed.) Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1972. Pages 96-109.)Google Scholar
Drever, James. (1952). A Dictionary of Psychology. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Koffka, James. (1928). The Growth of the Mind. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar
Lehrman, Daniel S. (1970). “Semantic and Conceptual Issues in the Nature-Nurture Problem.” In Development and Evolution of Behavior: Essays in Memory of T.C. Schneirla. Edited by L.R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D.S. Lehrman, and J.S. Rosenblatt. Pages 1752.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad. (1965). Evolution and Modification of Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. (1963). Populations, Species, and Evolution. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. (1900). The Philosophy of Leibniz. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar