No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Opportunities and Constraints in Developing Post-Soviet Political Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- News
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992
References
Dogan, Mattei and Pahre, Robert. 1990. Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Evgen'eva, A. P., ed. 1983. Slovar' russkogo iazyka v chetyrekh tomakh [Dictionary of the Russian Language in Four Volumes]. Moscow: Russkii iazyk.Google Scholar
Glaveckas, Kestutis, ed. 1990. Rinkos ekonomika ir valstybinis reguliavimas [The Market Economy and Governmental Regulation]. Vilnius: Lietuvos Laisvosios Rinkos Institutas, Balticon.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Neil. 1984. Soviet Political Scientists and American Politics. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Richard M.
1990. As Moscow Sees Us: American Politics and Society in the Soviet Mindset. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nechemias, Carol and Evans, Alfred Jr., 1991. “Political Science in the USSR,” PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 4: 632–33.Google Scholar
Politologiia. Kurs lektsii. Uchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov.
1991. [Political Science. A Series of Lectures. A Textbook for Institutions of Higher Learning]. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola.Google Scholar
Shakhnazarov, Georgii Kh. and Burlatskii, Fedor M.
1984–1985. “On the Development of Marxist-Leninist Political Science,” Soviet Law and Government, 22, 3: 3–26. [Originally published in 1980.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 1991. “Building Democracy in Estonia,” PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 3: 478–81.Google Scholar
You have
Access