Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:40:49.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Scientist or Politician: Why Not Be Both?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

David P. Redlawsk
David P. Redlawsk*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Academics in the Arena: Political Scientists Who Have Served in Elected Office
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 147 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 2000. “What Should Be Learned through Service Learning?” PS: Political Science & Politics 33 (3): 635–638.Google Scholar
Elmquist, Sonja. 2004. Prof Feels the Frenzy at the End. Daily Iowan. January 19, 2004, 6A. http://dailyiowan.lib.uiowa.edu/DI/2004/di2004-01-19.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard J. 1978. Homestyle: House Members in their Districts. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S., and Nickerson, David W.. 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1083–1096.Google Scholar
Gurwitt, Rob. 2001. “Larry Bartels: Playing Solomon.” Governing: The States and Localities. http://www.governing.com/topics/politics/Larry-Bartels-Playing-Solomon.html. Accessed January 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Jordan, Erin. 2004. “Majority of Iowa Professors are Democrats.” Des Moines Sunday Register, October 24, 14A.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–98.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mattes, Kyle, and Redlawsk, David P.. 2015. The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration: Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1021–44.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., and Rice, Tom (eds.) 2006. Civic Service: Service Learning with State and Local Government Partners. New York: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., Tolbert, Caroline J., and Donovan, Todd. 2010. Why Iowa? How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nomination Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., and Wilson, Nora. 2006. “Living the Theory: Local Politics and Service-Learning.” In Redlawsk, David P. and Rice, Tom (Eds.), Civic Service: Service Learning with State and Local Government Partners. New York: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–69.Google Scholar