Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:13:02.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Not-So-Calamitous Compact: A Response to DeWitt and Schwartz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

John R. Koza
John R. Koza*
Affiliation:
National Popular Vote
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper answers 24 criticisms of the National Popular Vote interstate compact in Darin DeWitt and Thomas Schwartz’s paper entitled “A Calamitous Compact” (found elsewhere in this issue).

Type
Controversy: The National Popular Vote Plan
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 797 - 804
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

DeWitt, Darin and Schwartz, Thomas. 2016. “A Calamitous Compact.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): this issue.Google Scholar
Doherty, Brendan J. 2012. The Rise of the President’s Permanent Campaign. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Foley, Edward B. 2016. Ballot Battles: The History of Dispute Elections in the United States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FairVote. 2015. Plurality in Gubernatorial Elections. http://www.fairvote.org/plurality-in-gubernatorial-elections.Google Scholar
Hecht, Stacey Hunter and Schultz, David. 2015. Presidential Swing States: Why Only Ten Matter. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.Google Scholar
Hudak, John Joseph. 2014. Presidential Pork: White House Influence over the Distribution of Federal Grants. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke and King, Gary. 2004. “Did Illegal Overseas Absentee Ballots Decide the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election?” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 537–49.Google Scholar
Koza, John R., Fadem, Barry F., Grueskin, Mark, Mandell, Michael S., Richie, Robert, and Zimmerman, Joseph F.. 2013. Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote. Los Altos, CA: National Popular Vote Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L. and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. The Particularistic President: Executive Branch Politics and Political Equality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrissey, , Ed. 2016. Going Red: The Two Million Voters Who Will Elect the Next President—And How Conservatives Can Win Them. New York, NY: Crown Forum.Google Scholar
Richie, Robert and Levien, Andrea. 2013. “The Contemporary Presidency: How The 2012 Presidential Election Has Strengthened the Movement For The National Popular Vote Plan.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 353–76.Google Scholar