Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:59:22.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Total antioxidant capacity of refrigerated orange juice treated with pulsed electric fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2008

C. Cortés
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avd. Vicent Andres Estelles s/n, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
F. Barba
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avd. Vicent Andres Estelles s/n, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
M. J. Esteve
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avd. Vicent Andres Estelles s/n, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
R. González
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avd. Vicent Andres Estelles s/n, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
A. Frígola
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avd. Vicent Andres Estelles s/n, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
1st International Immunonutrition Workshop, Valencia, 3–5 October 2007, Valencia, Spain
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Orange juice is an important source of carotenoids and ascorbic acid, a nutrient that besides its vitamin action is valuable for its antioxidant effect, stimulation of the immune system and other health benefits that are being actively investigated and reported, such as inhibition of the formation of cancer-causing N-nitroso compounds in the stomach(Reference Valkoa, Rhodesb, Moncola, Izakovica and Mazur1). During processing and/or storage orange juice undergoes an important number of undesirable effects on some nutrients, antioxidant compounds, colour, flavour and texture. The use of pulsed electric fields (PEF) is an emerging technology in the field of food preservation(Reference Min, Jin, Yeom, Min and Zhang2). The aim of the present work was to study the antioxidant capacity of the orange juice treated with PEF (30 kV/cm, 100 μs) in comparison with orange juice subjected to conventional thermal treatments (90°C during 20 s), as well as changes in orange juice stored at 2 and 10°C, using a method adapted from that of Miller et al.(Reference Miller, Diplock, Rice-Evans, Davies, Gopinathan and Milne3). The Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) of the samples was (mmol Trolox/l) 4.03 (sd 0.04), 3.51 (sd 0.04) and 2.49 (sd 0.20) for untreated, PEF-treated and pasteurized orange juice respectively. Thus, TEAC decreased significantly (P<0.05) after the orange juice was processed by both types of treatment; the decrease being greater in the pasteurized juice (38.2%) than in the PEF-treated juice (12.9%). Thus, PEF treatment of orange juice had an antioxidant capacity more similar to that of the untreated juice. The total antioxidant capacities of samples during refrigerated storage are shown in the Table. The results show a decrease with time at both temperatures, although the decrease was higher in the samples stored at 10°C. Compared with conventional pasteurization, PEF treatment led to a higher total antioxidant activity of orange juice immediately after processing, as well as during storage at 2–10°C.

This study was carried out with funds from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology and European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) (Project AGL-2003–05236-C02–02 and AGL-2006–13320-C03–03).

References

1. Valkoa, M, Rhodesb, CJ, Moncola, J, Izakovica, M & Mazur, M (2006) Chem Biol Interact 160, 140.Google Scholar
2. Min, S, Jin, ZT, Yeom, H, Min, SK & Zhang, QH (2003) J Food Sci 68, 12651271.Google Scholar
3. Miller, NJ, Diplock, AT, Rice-Evans, C, Davies, MJ, Gopinathan, V & Milne, A (1993) Cli Sci 84, 407412.Google Scholar