Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:49:17.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Daily Symptomology Tracking in Pernicious Anaemia: The Impact of Vitamin B12 Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2024

A. Thain
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK Alfie Thain is a PhD student supported by a studentship from the PAS and the University of Surrey, Surrey, UK
P. Visser
Affiliation:
Pernicious Anaemia Society (PAS)
K. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
K. Ahmadi
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Pernicious Anaemia (PA) is a common, multifactorial disease caused by malabsorption of vitamin B12 (B12) due to a lack of intrinsic factor (IF) because of autoimmune damage to the IF-producing parietal cells lining the stomach(Reference Annibale, Lahner and Fave1). PA remains largely neglected by the research/clinical communities, leading to high rates of mis/underdiagnosis(Reference Esposito, Dottori and Pivetta2) and an inadequate ‘one-size-fits-all’ treatment protocol. The current maintenance therapy of 1 mg intramuscular B12 injections every 2–3 months(3) is inadequate for 60% of PA patients, advocating for more frequent B12 injections. If untreated, megaloblastic anaemia and neurological damage ensue(Reference Htut, Thein and Oo4).

We hypothesise that a personalised approach to PA treatment will improve the quality of life and prevent severe irreversible neurological complications among PA patients. Our aim is to undertake the first large-scale real-time study of symptom range, severity and response to treatment across multiple B12 treatment cycles.

An initial online survey was developed and distributed to PAS members (www.surveymonkey.com/r/YV6M25Y) to collect data on diagnosis, treatment, family history and comorbidities. Individuals who completed the survey were given the opportunity to participate in Phase 1 of the subsequent daily symptom profile survey. Qualtrics was used to create a simple online tool to collect daily data on participants' symptoms, severity (1–10 scale, mild = 1, moderate = 5, severe = 10), and treatment regimen. Descriptive statistics were used to report the range, severity, and response of symptoms to B12 treatment for a preliminary pilot sample.

Between April-September 2022, 1182 respondents completed the initial PAS survey. Of these, 50% (n = 417) reported receiving treatment within the recommended guidelines; 55% (n = 684) expressed dissatisfaction with their current treatment regimen. Eight participants participated in the pilot study for a median of 58 days, during which they received B12 treatment on average 10/58 days and were symptomatic 46/58 days. The most common symptoms and their mean severity were: tiredness (80%, 5.28 [SD1.97]), tinnitus (43%, 4.71 [SD2.09]), and myalgia (33%, 5.17 [SD1.59]). Two participants data are presented in detail to illustrate the large variability in treatment and symptom severity in PA: Participant 1 received 3 intramuscular injections over 62 days and was symptomatic 98% of the time, reporting tinnitus (100%, 7.38 [SD1.43]), poor concentration (51%, 5.35 [SD1.43]) and aphasia (51%, 5.43 [SD1.56]). Participant 2 received 15 injections over 62 days and was symptomatic for 43% of the time, reporting tiredness (36%, 3.44 [SD0.83]), aphasia (24%, 3.83 [SD0.69]) and dizziness (24%, 1.83 [SD0.69]).

This pilot data provides real-time insight into the large inter-individual variability in the range, severity, and response of PA symptoms across multiple treatment cycles. Most patients report a significant reduction in symptoms using an “individualised” treatment approach, suggesting that a “one-size-fits-all” approach to treating PA is ineffective. Data collection is ongoing with the recruitment of 200 participants with PA to Phase 2 of the study.

References

Annibale, B, Lahner, E, Fave, GD et al. (2011) Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13(6), 518–24.10.1007/s11894-011-0225-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, G, Dottori, L, Pivetta, G et al. (2022) Nutrients 14(8), 1672.10.3390/nu14081672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htut, TW, Thein, KZ, Oo, TH. (2021) J Evid Based Med 14(2), 161–9.10.1111/jebm.12435CrossRefGoogle Scholar