Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T20:00:54.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can vinegar supplementation acutely influence appetite and glycaemic response?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2010

J. Darzi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
G. S. Frost
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
C. Cooke
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
V. Martin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
J. Pickard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
M. D. Robertson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Previous intervention studies have reported the oral provision of the SCFA propionate and acetate induce satiety(Reference Ostman, Granfeldt and Persson1Reference Liljeberg, Lonner and Bjorck2). However, effects on actual intake were not measured, visual analogue scales (VAS) accepted as the best method to subjectively assess appetite(Reference Flint, Raben and Blundell3) were not used, the taste effects of the SCFA (a potential confounder in appetite research) were not accounted for and the study duration was short (120 min postprandially). The present study therefore aimed to address these methodological weaknesses.

Sixteen unrestrained eaters (three male, thirteen female) aged 22.2 (sd 3.0) years were recruited to this randomised single-blind two-way cross-over study. Participants consumed a standard breakfast alongside a drink containing 25 g white wine vinegar or a drink without added vinegar (PL). Effects on appetite were assessed subjectively using VAS and assessed quantitatively by providing a preweighed ad libitum pasta meal 3 h postprandially. Capillary blood samples were regularly collected by fingerprick to monitor the postprandial glycaemic response.

Vinegar treatment significantly reduced subjective appetite ratings for the desire to eat (P=0.043) and hunger (P=0.063) and increased fullness (P=0.002) and also nausea (P=0.002) when compared with PL 180 min area under the curve. In addition, quantitative measures of appetite were significantly influenced, with a mean intake of the pasta meal following PL and vinegar of 3401 (sd 1004) kJ and 2774 (sd 883) kJ respectively (P=0.048, n 15). Vinegar treatment was also found to significantly lower the glycaemic response for the first 120 min (P=0.022).

In conclusion, the findings from the present study suggest that vinegar influences appetite and blunts the glycaemic response, possibly as a result of increased nausea and the reduced palatability of the vinegar-containing product. These findings support a role for oral provision of SCFA to reduce appetite, in agreement with previous studies(Reference Ostman, Granfeldt and Persson1Reference Liljeberg, Lonner and Bjorck2).

A follow-up study is underway to investigate the orosensory effects of vinegar on appetite and metabolic response using the modified sham-feeding technique.

References

1. Ostman, E, Granfeldt, Y, Persson, L et al. . (2005) Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 983988.Google Scholar
2. Liljeberg, HG, Lonner, CH & Bjorck, IM (1995) J Nut 125, 15031511.Google Scholar
3. Flint, A, Raben, A, Blundell, JE et al. (2002) Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar