Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:01:31.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industry Trends to 2040

Part of: Industry 4.0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Claudia Eckert ,
Ola Isaksson ,
Sophie Hallstedt ,
Johan Malmqvist ,
Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck  and
Massimo Panarotto
Claudia Eckert*
Affiliation:
The Open University;
Ola Isaksson
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
Sophie Hallstedt
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology;
Johan Malmqvist
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology
Massimo Panarotto
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
*
Contact: Eckert, Claudia, The Open University, Engineering and Innovation, United Kingdom, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The engineering design community needs to development tools and methods now to support emerging technological and societal trends. While many forecasts exist for technological and societal changes, this paper reports on the findings of a workshop, which addressed trends in engineering design to 2040. The paper summarises the key findings from the six themes of the workshop: societal trends, ways of working, lifelong learning, technology, modelling and simulation and digitisation; and points to the challenge of understanding how these trends affect each other

Keywords

TrendsSocietal consequencesDesign processSystems Engineering (SE)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2121 - 2128
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

EU. (2011), “Fligthpath 2050 – Europe's Vision for Aviation”, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-19724-6. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/modes/air/doc/flightpath2050.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S. and Isaksson, O. (2017), “Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 161, pp. 40–52.Google Scholar
“Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1,5°C”, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/07/SR15_SPM_version_stand_alone_LR.pdfGoogle Scholar
Oztemel, E. and Gursev, S. J. (2018), “Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies”, Intell Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8Google Scholar
Robèrt, K.H. and Broman, G. (2017), “Prisoners’ dilemma misleads business and policy making”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, pp. 10–16.Google Scholar
Steffen, , et al. (2015), “Guiding human development on a changing planet”, Science. Vol. 347, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855Google Scholar
UN. (2015), “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/Google Scholar
Vivanco, D. F., René, K. and van der Voet, E. (2016), “How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach”, Energy Policy, Vol. 94, pp. 114–125.Google Scholar