Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:06:45.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of a homogeneous X-ray selected AGN sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2014

Gurgen M. Paronyan ,
Areg M. Mickaelian  and
Hayk V. Abrahamyan
Gurgen M. Paronyan
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Byurakan 0213, Aragatzotn province, Armenia Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Areg M. Mickaelian
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Byurakan 0213, Aragatzotn province, Armenia Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Hayk V. Abrahamyan
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Byurakan 0213, Aragatzotn province, Armenia Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Based on optical identifications of ROSAT sources, we have created a large homogeneous catalog of X-ray selected AGN. The Hamburg-RASS Catalog (HRC) and Byurakan-Hamburg-RASS Catalog (BHRC) made up on the basis of optical identification of X-ray sources from ROSAT Bright Source (BSC) and Faint Source (FSC) catalogues, respectively, have been used. These identiifcations were based on low-dispersion spectra of Hamburg Quasar Survey (HQS). As a result, a new large sample of X-ray selected AGN has been compiled containing 4253 sources with photon count rate CR > 0.04 ct/s in the area with galactic latitudes |b|>20 and declinations δ>0. All these sources are classified as AGN or candidate AGN. We have carried out multiwavelength studies in several wavelength ranges (X-ray, optical, radio). Catalogues that more or less guarantee the completeness condition (all-sky or large area surveys) were used. A number of erroneous classifications were found (some AGN had been classified as stars or galaxies); 1024 and 59 from HRC and BHRC, respectively. Out of 4253 sources, 3352 are spectroscopically confirmed AGN (given in Veron-Cetty & Veron and Roma Blazar catalogs), and the rest 901 are candidate AGN. For 210 of them spectra are available in SDSS DR9, and the results of their classification are given in another paper. We calculated absolute magnitudes, fluxes, improved coordinates and redshifts. An attempt is made to find a connection between the radiation fluxes in different bands for different types of sources, and identify their typical characteristics, thus confirming candidate AGN and in some cases finding new ones.

Keywords

surveysX-ray: AGNradio: AGNIR: AGNUV: AGNAGN candidates
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S304: Multiwavelength AGN Surveys and Studies , October 2013 , pp. 161 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ahn, C. P.c; Alexandroff, R., et al. 2012 ApJSS 203, 21Google Scholar
Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., White, R. L., et al. 1999, ApJ 475, 479, v1999 in VizierGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, L., Herald, J., Efremova, B., et al. 2011 ApSS 335, 161Google Scholar
Bird, A. J., Bazzano, A., Bassani, L., et al. 2010 ApJSS 186, 1Google Scholar
Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, Astron. J. 115, 1693Google Scholar
Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003 IPAC/CalTechGoogle Scholar
Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2012, WISE All-Sky DR, VizieR Catalog II/311Google Scholar
Hagen, H.-J., Groote, D., Engels, D., & Reimers, D. 1995, A&AS 111, 195Google Scholar
Lasker, B. M., Lattanzi, M. G., McLean, B. J., et al. 2008, AJ 136, 735Google Scholar
Massaro, E., Giommi, P., Leto, C., et al. 2009, A&A 495, 691Google Scholar
McMahon, R. G., Irwin, M. J., & Maddox, S. J., 2000, IoA, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Mickaelian, A. M., Hovhannisyan, L. R., Engels, D., et al. 2006, A&A 449, 425Google Scholar
Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Casian, B., et al. 2003, AJ 125, 984Google Scholar
Moshir, M., Kopan, G., Conrow, T., et al. 1992, ES IRAS FSS, v2, JPLGoogle Scholar
Nolan, P. L., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2012 ApJSS 199, 31NGoogle Scholar
Schwope, A., Hasinger, G., Lehmann, I., et al. 2000, AN, 321, 1Google Scholar
Veron-Cetty, M. P., Veron, P. 2010, A&A 518, A10Google Scholar
Voges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, T., Braeuninger, H., Briel, U. 1999, A&A 349, 389Google Scholar
Voges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, Th., et al. 2000, IAU Circ., 7432Google Scholar
Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., & Mainzer, A. K., 2010, AJ 140, 1868Google Scholar
Zickgraf, F.-J., Engels, D., Hagen, H.-J., et al. 2003, A&A 406, 535Google Scholar