Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:19:20.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recoil velocity of pulsar/magnetar induced by magnetic dipole and quadrupole radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Yasufumi Kojima
Yasufumi Kojima*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8526, Japan email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recoil velocity is examined as a back reaction to the magnetic dipole and quadrupole radiations from a pulsar/magnetar born with rapid rotation. The model is extended from notable Harrison-Tademaru one by including arbitrary field-strength of the magnetic quadrupole moment. The process is slow one operating on a spindown timescale. Resultant velocity depends on not the magnitude, but rather the ratio of the two moments and their geometrical configuration. The model does not necessarily lead to high spatial velocity for a magnetar with a strong magnetic field. This fact is consistent with the recent observational upper bound. The maximum velocity predicted with this model is slightly smaller than that of observed fast-moving pulsars.

Keywords

magnetic fieldsstars: neutronpulsars
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S291: Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 years , August 2012 , pp. 428 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Bonanno, A., Urpin, V., & Belvedere, G., 2006, A&A, 451, 1049Google Scholar
De Luca, A., Caraveo, P. A., Esposito, P., & Hurley, K., 2009, ApJ, 698, 250Google Scholar
Harrison, E. R. & Tademaru, E., 1975, ApJ, 201, 447Google Scholar
Helfand, D. J.et al. 2007, ApJ, 662, 1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G., Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G., & Kramer, M., 2005, MNRAS, 360, 974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, D. L., Chatterjee, S., Hales, C. A., Gaensler, B. M., & Slane, P. O., 2009, AJ, 137, 354Google Scholar
Kojima, Y. & Kato, E. Y., 2011, ApJ, 728, 25Google Scholar
Lai, D., Chernoff, D. F., & Cordes, J. M., 2001, ApJ, 549, 1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, R. N., Taylor, J. H. & Van, Y. Y., 1974, ApJ, 189, L119Google Scholar