Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:32.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quasar and Supermassive Black Hole Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Scott M. Croom  and
Stephen Fine
Scott M. Croom
Affiliation:
Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Email: [email protected]
Stephen Fine
Affiliation:
Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Email: [email protected] Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Roiad, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present results from statistical analysis of the largest quasar surveys currently in existence: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ), and the 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO (2SLAQ) Survey. The quasar luminosity function shows highly significant (>99.9%) evidence of downsizing: the number density of faint quasars peaks at lower redshift than bright quasars. We measure the distribution of quasar broad-line widths as a function of luminosity, particularly focusing on the Mg ii λ2799 line. There is a clear trend, such that more luminous quasars show less scatter in line width than fainter quasars. However, the scatter in line width for any given luminosity (particularly in the brightest objects) is so small that it challenges our current understanding of virial black hole mass estimates.

Keywords

black hole physicsline: profilessurveysgalaxies: activequasars: generalquasars: emission lines
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S267: Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies , August 2009 , pp. 223 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Alexander, D. M., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barger, A. J., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, M. C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongiorno, A., et al. 2007, A&A, 472, 443Google Scholar
Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., & Broderick, J. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., & Cohen, J. G. 1996, AJ, 112, 839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croom, S. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 19 (C09a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croom, S. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1755 (C09b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croom, S. M., Smith, R. J., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., & Loaring, N. S. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, S., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1413Google Scholar
Hasinger, G., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L45Google Scholar
Hasinger, G., Miyaji, T., & Schmidt, M. 2005, A&A, 441, 417Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. 2005b, ApJ, 630, 716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juneau, S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspi, S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 629, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollatschny, W. & Dietrich, M. 1996, A&A, 314, 43Google Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Richstone, D. 1995, ARAA, 33, 581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahony, E. K., Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., Edge, A. C., Mauch, T., & Sadler, E. M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauch, T., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLure, R. J. & Dunlop, J. S. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLure, R. J. & Jarvis, M. J. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyaji, T., Hasinger, G., & Schmidt, M. 2001, A&A, 369, 49Google Scholar
Onken, C. A. & Peterson, B. M. 2002, ApJ, 572, 746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, G. T., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D. P., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremaine, S., et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, 740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Y., Akiyama, M., Ohta, K., & Miyaji, T. 2003, ApJ, 598, 886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, M. & Peterson, B. M. 2006, ApJ, 641, 689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandel, A., Peterson, B. M., & Malkan, M. A. 1999, ApJ, 526, 579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, M. 1985, MNRAS, 213, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, C., Wisotzki, L., Borch, A., Dye, S., Kleinheinrich, M., & Meisenheimer, K. 2003, A&A, 408, 499Google Scholar