Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:45:21.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globular clusters as tracers of the halo assembly of nearby central cluster galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

Michael Hilker  and
Tom Richtler
Michael Hilker
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85748, Garching bei München, Germany email: [email protected]
Tom Richtler
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The properties of globular cluster systems (GCSs) in the core of the nearby galaxy clusters Fornax and Hydra I are presented. In the Fornax cluster we have gathered the largest radial velocity sample of a GCS system so far, which enables us to identify photometric and kinematic sub-populations around the central galaxy NGC 1399. Moreover, ages, metallicities and [α/Fe] abundances of a sub-sample of 60 bright globular clusters (GCs) with high S/N spectroscopy show a multi-modal distribution in the correlation space of these three parameters, confirming heterogeneous stellar populations in the halo of NGC 1399. In the Hydra I cluster very blue GCs were identified. They are not uniformly distributed around the central galaxies. 3-color photometry including the U-band reveals that some of them are of intermediate age. Their location coincides with a group of dwarf galaxies under disruption. This is evidence of a structurally young stellar halo “still in formation”, which is also supported by kinematic measurements of the halo light that point to a kinematically disturbed system. The most massive GCs divide into generally more extended ultra-compact dwarf galaxies (UCDs) and genuine compact GCs. In both clusters, the spatial distribution and kinematics of UCDs are different from those of genuine GCs. Assuming that some UCDs represent nuclei of stripped galaxies, the properties of those UCDs can be used to trace the assembly of nucleated dwarf galaxies into the halos of central cluster galaxies. We show via semi-analytical approaches within a cosmological simulation that only the most massive UCDs in Fornax-like clusters can be explained by stripped nuclei, whereas the majority of lower mass UCDs belong to the star cluster family.

Keywords

galaxies: halosgalaxies: kinematics and dynamicsgalaxies: star clustersgalaxies: clusters: individual (Fornax, Hydra I)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 11 , Issue S317: The General Assembly of Galaxy Halos: Structure, Origin and Evolution , August 2015 , pp. 128 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Arnaboldi, M., Ventimiglia, G., Iodice, E., Gerhard, O., & Coccato, L. 2102, A&A, 545, 37Google Scholar
Bassino, L. P., Faifer, F. R., Forte, J. C., Dirsch, B., Richtler, T., Geisler, D., & Schuberth, Y. 2006, A&A, 451, 789Google Scholar
Bekki, K., Forbes, D. A., Beasley, M. A., & Couch, W. J. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1344Google Scholar
Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Salasnich, B., Dal Cero, C., Rubele, S., & Nanni, A. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127Google Scholar
Brüns, R. C., Kroupa, P., & Fellhauer, M. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1268Google Scholar
Dirsch, B., Richtler, T., Geisler, D., Forte, J. C., Bassino, L. P., & Gieren, W. P. 2003, AJ, 125, 1908Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. J., Jones, J. B., Gregg, M. D., & Phillipps, S. 2000, PASA, 17, 227Google Scholar
Durrell, P. R., Côté, P., Peng, E. W., Blakeslee, J. P., Ferrarese, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 103Google Scholar
Fellhauer, M. & Kroupa, P. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 642Google Scholar
Gregg, M.D., Drinkwater, M.J., Evstigneeva, E., Jurek, R., Karick, A.M., Phillipps, S., Bridges, T., Jones, J.B., Bekki, K., & Couch, W.J. 2009 AJ, 137, 498Google Scholar
Hayakawa, A., Furusho, T., Yamasaki, N. Y., Ishida, M., & Ohashi, T. 2004, PASJ, 56, 743Google Scholar
Hilker, M., Infante, L., Vieira, G., Kissler-Patig, M., & Richtler, T. 1999, A&AS, 134, 75Google Scholar
Hilker, M. 2002, in: Geisler, D., Grebel, E.K., & Minniti, D. (eds.), Extragalactic Star Clusters, IAU Symp. 207 (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, p. 281Google Scholar
Hilker, M. 2003, in: Kissler-Patig, M. (ed.), Extragalactic Globular Cluster Systems: Proceedings of the ESO Workshop, Garching (Springer-Verlag), p. 173Google Scholar
Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Misgeld, I., Jordán, A., Infante, L., & Kissler-Patig, M. 2009, A&A, 498, 705Google Scholar
Minniti, D., Kissler-Patig, M., Goudfrooij, P., & Meylan, G. 1998, AJ, 115, 121Google Scholar
Misgeld, I., Mieske, S., & Hilker, M. 2008 A&A, 486, 697Google Scholar
Misgeld, I., Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Richtler, T., Georgiev, I. Y., & Schuberth, Y. 2011, A&A, 531, 4Google Scholar
Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 691, 946Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., Griffen, B. F., Baumgardt, H., & Hilker, M. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3670Google Scholar
Richtler, T., Salinas, R., Misgeld, I., Hilker, M., Hau, G. K. T., Romanowsky, A. J., Schuberth, Y., & Spolaor, M. 2011, A&A, 531, 119Google Scholar
Romanowsky, A.J., Strader, J., Brodie, J.P., Mihos, J.C., Spitler, L.R., Forbes, D.A., Foster, C., & Arnold, J.A. 2012 ApJ, 748, 29Google Scholar
Schuberth, Y., Richtler, T., Hilker, M., Dirsch, B., Bassino, L.P., Romanowsky, A.J., & Infante, L. 2010 A&A, 513, 52Google Scholar
Seth, A. C., van den Bosch, R., Mieske, S., Baumgardt, H., & Den Brok, M., et al. 2014, Nature, 513, 398Google Scholar
Voggel, K., Hilker, M., & Richtler, T. 2016 A&A, 586, A102Google Scholar
Wehner, E. M. H., Harris, W. E., Whitmore, B. C., Rothberg, B., & Woodley, K. A. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1233Google Scholar