Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:23:19.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence of Omega Cen tidal debris in the Kapteyn moving group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Elizabeth Wylie-de Boer
Affiliation:
Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Cotter Road, Weston Creek, ACT, Australia, 2611 email: [email protected], [email protected]
Kenneth Freeman
Affiliation:
Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Cotter Road, Weston Creek, ACT, Australia, 2611 email: [email protected], [email protected]
Mary Williams
Affiliation:
Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents a detailed kinematic and chemical analysis of 16 members of the Kapteyn moving group. The group does not appear to be chemically homogenous. However, the kinematics and the chemical abundance patterns seen in 14 of the stars in this group are similar to those observed in the well-studied cluster, ω Centauri. Some members of this moving group may be remnants of the tidal debris of ω Cen, left in the Galactic disk during the merger event which deposited ω Cen into the Milky Way. A more detailed version of this work can be found in Wylie de-Boer et al. 2009.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Beers, T. C., Chiba, M., Yoshii, Y., Platais, I., Hanson, R. B., Fuchs, B., & Rossi, S. 2000, AJ, 119, 2866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekki, K. & Freeman, K. C. 2003, MNRAS, 346, L11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinescu, D. I. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 265, Omega Centauri, A Unique Window into Astrophysics, ed. van Leeuwen, F., Hughes, J. D., & Piotto, G., 365–+Google Scholar
Eggen, O. J. 1996, AJ, 112, 1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggen, O. J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sandage, A. R. 1962, ApJ, 136, 748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., Desidera, S., Lucatello, S., Mazzei, P., & Barbieri, M. 2003, A&A, 406, 131Google Scholar
Meza, A., Navarro, J. F., Abadi, M. G., & Steinmetz, M. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. E. & Da Costa, G. S. 1995, ApJ, 447, 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B., Cunha, K., Gallino, R., Busso, M., Lambert, D. L., & Straniero, O. 2000, AJ, 119, 1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venn, K. A., Irwin, M., Shetrone, M. D., Tout, C. A., Hill, V., & Tolstoy, E. 2004, AJ, 128, 1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie-deBoer, E. C. Boer, E. C., Freeman, K. C., & Williams, M. 2009, AJ, in pressGoogle Scholar