Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:04:52.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PET PLASTIC IN FOOD AND BEVERAGE PACKAGING DESIGN: A REVIEW OF LEGISLATION, LITERATURE AND INDUSTRY REPORTING COMPARING EUROPEAN AND SOUTH AFRICAN INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

M. Maritz*
Affiliation:
Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa
V. Eriksson
Affiliation:
Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa
V. Barnes
Affiliation:
Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article draws inspiration from two concepts, which initially appear to be at odds with each other. The first refers to the impact that plastics use has had on the environment and human health, while the second explores the prevalence and continued increase in the use of plastic materials. The manufacturing of plastic packaging will be reviewed to identify appropriate intervention. This article focuses on the future development of PET packaging in South Africa, exploring current literature and legislation which aid in the holistic development of the plastic packaging value chain.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Adoption of the Paris Agreement. (2015), In: Framework convention on Climate Change. [online] United Nations, Paris. Available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (accessed 7.11.2019).Google Scholar
Aneck-Hahn, N.H. et al. (2018), “Estrogenic activity, selected plasticizers and potential health risks associated with bottled water in South Africa”, Journal of water and health, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 253262. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2018.043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babayemi, J.O. et al. (2019), “Ensuring sustainability in plastics use in Africa: consumption, waste generation, and projections”, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 31 No. 1, p. 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-019-0254-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, D., Dooley, L. and Tuovinen, J.E. (2002), Gestalt Theory in Visual Screen Design — A New look at an old subject. In: Not Set ed. Selected Papers from the 7th World Conference on Computers in Education (WCCE’01), Copenhagen, Computers in Education 2001: Australian Topics. Australian Computer Society, Melbourne, pp. 512.Google Scholar
d'Ambrières, W. (2019), “Plastics recycling worldwide: current overview and desirable changes”, The journal of field actions, Vol. 19, pp. 1221.Google Scholar
Department of Environmental Affairs (2016), National Gazette no 40207, Volume 614, South African Govern-ment, p. 1. Available at: https://www.greengazette.co.za/notices/index-for-20160812-national-gazette-no-40207-of-12-august-2016-volume-614_20160812-GGN-40207.pdf.pdf [Accessed 7.11.2019].Google Scholar
Department of Social Development. (2015), The National Development Plan 2030: Persons with disabilities as equal citizens, Department of Social Development, Pretoria, pp. 68.Google Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012), Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. [online] Available: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf [Accessed 7.11.2019].Google Scholar
Foster, J. (2019), “International flexible packaging trends and sustainability”, Proceedings of the 2019 Propak Africa conference, Johannesburg, 12-15 March 2019.Google Scholar
Franklin Associates. (2014), Impact of plastics packaging on life cycle energy consumption & greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and Canada – Substitution Analysis, pp. 516.Google Scholar
Garg, A.X., Hackam, D. and Tonelli, M. (2008), “Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough”, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 3, pp. 253260. Online. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01430307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, J. and Pivo, G. (2017), The Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Economic Development Theory and Practice. University of Portland State & University of Arizona, Research Paper No. 1-12. Available at SAGEPUB: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242416674808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanekom, A. (2019), “Replacing plastic: blessing or curse?”, Proceedings of the 2019 Propak Africa conference, Johannesburg, 12-15 March 2019.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T., Wager, E. and Davidoff, F. (2002), Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review. Journal of American Medical Association, Vol. 287 No. 21, pp. 27862790. [online]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, C.S. et al. (2018), A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastics and Microplastic Legislation Worldwide. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, Vol. 229, No. 11, p. 345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4002-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.G. and Xu, X. (2005), “Design for the environment: life cycle assessment and sustainable packaging issues”, Int. J. Environmental Technology and Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1441, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2005.006505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, A. and Vaughan, A. (2008), Fantastic Plastic. 1st ed. Gatsby Science Enhancement Programme, London. pp. 155. [online] https://www.stem.org.uk/system/files/elibrary-resources/legacy_files_migrated/12754-PLS_booklet.pdfGoogle Scholar
MacKerron, C. (2015), Waste and Opportunity 2015: Environmental Progress and Challenges in Food, Beverage, and Consumer Goods Packaging, Natural Resources Defense Council, pp. 458.Google Scholar
Packaging, SA (2018), Packaging SA Extended Producer Responsibility plan – Volume 1, Packaging SA Extended Producer Responsibility plan, [online] Plastics SA, pp. 18-77. Available at: https://www.packagingsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Packaging-SA-EPR-Plan-Volume-1.pdf [accessed 7.11.2019].Google Scholar
Papanek, V. (1995), Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change, Thames and Hudson, London, p. 38,256.Google Scholar
PETCO. (2016), Minister calls for Industry Waste Management Plans – PETCO. [online] Available at: https://petco.co.za/section28/ [accessed 7.11.2019].Google Scholar
Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2008), Systematic Reviews in The Social Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426406778881728Google Scholar
Plastics, SA (2018), 2017 Plastics Recycling figures released. [online] Available at: https://www.plasticsinfo.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2017-PLASTICS-RECYCLING-FIGURES-RELEASED_FINAL.pdf [Accessed 1 Nov. 2019].Google Scholar
Plastics, SA (2019), End Plastic Pollution – South African Alliance. [online] Available at: https://www.plasticsinfo.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/PLASTICS-SA-ANNOUNCES-POLLUTION-ALLIANCE_FINAL-2019.pdf [Accessed 11 Nov. 2019].Google Scholar
Plastics, SA (2019), National plastics recycling survey 2018: Recycling is the realization of the plastics circular economy. [online] Available at: https://www.plasticsinfo.co.za/recycling/ [Accessed 1 Nov. 2019].Google Scholar
Ray, S.C. et al. (2017), “Functional diamond like carbon (DLC) coatings on polymer for improved gas barrier performance”, Diamond and Related Materials, Vol. 80, pp. 5963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2017.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, S. (2009), “Food Packaging History and Innovations”, Journal of Agricultural and food chemistry, Vol. 57 No. 18, pp. 80898091. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900040rCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweitzer, J. et al. (2018a), Unwrapped: how throwaway plastic is failing to solve Europe's food waste problem (and what we need to do instead), Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, A study by Zero Waste Europe and Friends of the Earth Europe for the Rethink Plastic Alliance, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, J.P., Petsinaris, F. and Gionfra, C. (2018), Justifying plastic pollution: how Life Cycle Assessments are misused in food packaging policy, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels. A study by Zero Waste Europe and Friends of the Earth Europe for the Rethink Plastic Alliance, pp. 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.018Google Scholar
Sherwood, J. et al. (2017), “Recirculation: A new concept to drive innovation in sustainable product design for bio-based products”, Molecules, Vol. 22 No. 1, p. 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siracusa, V. et al. (2014), Environmental assessment of a multilayer polymer bag for food packaging and preservation: An LCA approach. Food Research International, Vol. 62, pp. 151161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonesson, U., Davis, J. and Ziegler, F. (2009), Food Production and Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. An overview of the climate impact of different product groups. Sweden: Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, pp. 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.024Google Scholar
United Nations (2018), State of plastics: World Environment Day Outlook 2018 [online] United Nations, pp. 313. Available at: https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/state-plastics-world-environment-day-outlook-2018 [Accessed 25.2.2019].Google Scholar
Wagemans, J. et al. (2012), “A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 138 No. 6, pp. 12181252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029334Google Scholar