Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:47:35.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of glycerol in diets for finishing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

M E E McCann*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
E Magowan
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom
V E Beattie
Affiliation:
Devenish Nutrition Ltd., Belfast, United Kingdom
K J McCracken
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
F J Gordon
Affiliation:
John Thompson and Sons Ltd, Belfast, United Kingdom
M D Scott
Affiliation:
Devenish Nutrition Ltd., Belfast, United Kingdom
M-J Robinson
Affiliation:
John Thompson and Sons Ltd, Belfast, United Kingdom
R Bradford
Affiliation:
John Thompson and Sons Ltd, Belfast, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The production of fuel from renewable energy sources has generated increasing interest in recent years and biofuel production is being encouraged within the United Kingdom. If current government targets are to be met, approximately 2.7 million tonnes of oil seed rape are needed to supply biodiesel which will result in a significant amount of the by-product glycerol. Glycerol may be a useful source of energy in diets for pigs but there is limited research on the optimum level of inclusion, digestible energy (DE) content or on the effect on performance. Research by Mourot et al (1994) suggested that glycerol tended to reduce performance but significantly improved meat quality as assessed by drip loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of glycerol inclusion in finishing pig diets on performance and meat quality.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beattie, V.E., Weatherup, R.N., Moss, B.W. and Walker, N. (1999). Meat Science, 52, 205–211.Google Scholar
Brief, D.J. and Davis, J.D. (1982).. Physiology and Behaviour, 29, 577–580.Google Scholar
Mourot, J., Aumaitre, A., Mounier, A., Peiniau, P. and Francois, A.C. (1994). Livestock Production Science, 38, 237–244.Google Scholar