Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:09:00.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Kathryn Balmforth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Kathryn Balmforth*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CEDAW: Threat to, or Enhancement of, Human Rights?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 This is true, at least, among the developed nations. If countries are poor, weak, and in need of international assistance, they may already be subject to coercion to comply as a condition of receiving assistance.

3 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Art. 7, para. 2(g), A/CONF. 183/9.

4 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art. 25, para. 2.

5 CEDAW/C/2000/CRP.3/Add.l/Rev.l, para. 42 (Jordan); CEDAW/C/1999/L.2/Add.3, para. 29 (Georgia); A/53/38, para. 110 (Croatia).

6 See, e.g., CEDAW/C/1999/L.2/Add.2, paras 26-27 (abortion); A/54/39, paras.127-28 (lesbianism).

7 See A/54/38, paras. 288-89 (China), para. 197 (Greece); EDAW/C/2000/ICRP.3/ Add.7/Rev.l, paras. 39-0.