Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:46:17.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Canada-United States West Coast Salmon Dispute: The Role of the Substate Units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Ted L. McDorman
Ted L. McDorman*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Political Subdivisions as Non-State Actors
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 92 , 1998 , pp. 345 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In regard to the international legal standing of this measure, see McDorman, Ted L., The West Coast Salmon Dispute: A Canadian View of the Breakdown of the 1985 Treaty and the Transit License Measure, 17 Loy. L. A. Int’l & Comp. L. J. 477–506 (1995)Google Scholar.

2 As of mid-1998, neither Canada nor the United States had ratified the Law of the Sea Convention.

3 For a detailed analysis of Article 66, see Williamt. Burke, The New International Law of Fisheries 151-98 (1994).

4 Pacific Salmon Treaty, Jan. 28, 1985, U.S.-Can., 99 Stat. 7.

5 Convention for the Protection, Preservation and Extension of the Sockeye Salmon Fishery in the Fraser River System, May 26, 1930, U.S.-Can., 8 U.S.T. 1058.

6 See Munro, Gordon R. & Stokes, Robert L., The Canada-United States Pacific Salmon Treaty, in Canadian Oceans Policy: National Strategies and the New Law of the Sea 24–25 (McRae, D. & Munro, G. eds., 1989)Google Scholar.

7 The report of the mediator, Christopher Beebe, has not be made public. However, one Canadian newspaper has recounted much of the its contents. See Jeffrey Simpson, Americans Have a Lot of Vetoes When It Comes to Salmon, Toronto Globe and Mail, NOV. 27, 1997, at A24.

8 Even so, the federal government of Canada and the province of Quebec frequently have struggled regarding Quebec’s forays onto the international stage.

9 Pub. L. No. 99-5, 99 Stat. 7 (1985), codified at 16 U.S.C. sec. 3631-3644 (1997).

10 See 16 U.S.C. §§ 3632(g)(7), 3635.

11 See Stevens, Ted, United States-Canada Salmon Treaty Negotiations: The Alaskan Perspective, 16 Envt L. L. 423, 429 (1986)Google Scholar.

12 Munro, McDorman & McKelvey, supra note *.

13 David W. Strangway & William D. Ruckelshaus, Pacific Salmon Report to the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of the United States (Jan. 12, 1998).