Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:43:52.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atoms Versus Bits: Consumer Protection in the (Cyber) Trade Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sonia E. Rolland*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University School of Law; Georgetown University Law Center

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Can International Law Keep Up with the Internet?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Reidenberg, Joel, Technology and Internet Jurisdiction, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1951 (2005)Google Scholar.

2 Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre le Racisme et L’Antisémitisme; L’Union des Étudiants Juifs de France, 433 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2006).

3 Code Pénal [C. Pén.] art. R645-1 (Fr.).

4 L’Union des étudiants juifs de France et La ligue contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme contre Yahoo! Inc. et Yahoo France, Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (May 22, 2000).

5 Panel Report, United States—Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services, WT/DS285/R (Apr. 20, 2005), as modified by Appellate Body Report WT/DS285/AB/R, DSR 2005:XII, at 5797.

6 Generación de Confianza en el Comercio Electrónico (Building Trust in E-Commerce) (Estudio Jurídico Altmark & Brenna), at 62.

7 See, e.g., Delisle, Jacques & Trujillo, Elisabeth, Consumer Protection in Transnational Contexts, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 135, 139–59 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kightlinger, Mark F., Cyberage Conflicts Law: A Solution to the Yahoo! Problem? The EC E-Commerce Directive as a Model for International Cooperation on Internet Choice of Law, 24 Mich. J. Int’l L. 719 (2003)Google Scholar; O’Hara, Erin Ann, Choice of Law for Internet Transactions: The Uneasy Case for Online Consumer Protection, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1883 (2005)Google Scholar.

8 For a full examination of the role of consumer interests in WTO law, see Rolland, Sonia E., Are Consumer-Oriented Rules the New Frontier of Trade Liberalizations? 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 401 (2014)Google Scholar.

9 See, e.g., Swire, Peter P., Elephants and Mice Revisited: Law and Choice of Law on the Internet, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1975 Google Scholar, 1987–88 (2005).

10 Perritt, Henry H. Jr., The Internet and Public International Law: The Internet Is Changing the Public International Legal System, 88 Ky. L.J. 885 (19992000)Google Scholar.

11 On U.S.-EU data protection standards, see Shaffer, Greg, Globalization and Social Protection: The Impact of EU and International Rules in the Ratcheting Up of U.S. Data Privacy Standards, 25 Yale J. Int’l L. 1 (2000)Google Scholar.

12 See, e.g., Aguilar, John, Over the Rainbow European and American Consumer Protection Policy and Remedy Conflicts on the Internet and a Possible Solution, 4 Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y 1 (19992000)Google Scholar; Kesan, Jay P. & Gallo, Andres A., Optimizing Regulation of Electronic Commerce, 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1497 (2004)Google Scholar.

13 Raymond, Anjanette H. & Lambert, J. Benjamin, Technology, E-commerce and the Emerging Harmonization: The Growing Body of International Instruments Facilitating E-commerce and the Continuing Need to Encourage Wide Adoption, 17 Int’l Trade & Bus. L. Rev. 419 (2014)Google Scholar.