Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:31:03.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of “Shuttered” Hospitals to Expand Surge Capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Richard D. Zane ,
Paul Biddinger ,
Lyndsley Ide ,
Sally Phillips ,
Donna Hurd ,
Louisa Buatti ,
Hilary Eustace ,
Matthew Amsden ,
Darcy Carr  and
Andrea Hassol
Richard D. Zane*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Paul Biddinger
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Lyndsley Ide
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Sally Phillips
Affiliation:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Donna Hurd
Affiliation:
Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Louisa Buatti
Affiliation:
Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Hilary Eustace
Affiliation:
Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Matthew Amsden
Affiliation:
Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Darcy Carr
Affiliation:
Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Andrea Hassol
Affiliation:
Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
*
Vice-Chair Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street Boston, MA 02115 USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

With limited available hospital beds in most urban areas, there are very few options when trying to relocate patients already within the hospital to make room for incoming patients from a mass-casualty incident (MCI) or epidemic (a patient surge). This study investigates the possibility and process for utilizing shuttered (closed or former) hospitals to accept medically stable, ambulatory patients transferred from a tertiary medical facility.

Methods:

Two recently closed, acute care hospitals were evaluated critically to determine if they could be made ready to accept inpatients within 3–7 days of a MCI. This surge facility ideally would be able to support 200–300 patients/beds. Two generic scenarios were used for planning: (1) a patient surge (including one caused by conventional war or terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, or a disaster caused by natural hazards) requiring transfer of ambulatory, medically-stable inpatients to another facility in an effort to increase capacity at existing hospitals; and (2) a bio-event or epidemic where a shuttered hospital could be used as an isolation facility.

Results:

Both recently closed hospitals had significant, but different challenges to reopening, although with careful planning and resource allocation it would be possible to reopen them within 3–7 days. Planning was the most conclusive recommendation. It does not appear possible to reopen shuttered hospitals with major structural deterioration or a complete lack of current mission (i.e., no current utilities). Staffing would represent the most challenging issue as a surge facility would represent an incremental additional need for existing and scarce human resources.

Conclusions:

With careful planning, a shuttered hospital could be reopened and ready to accept patients within 3–7 days of a MCI or epidemic.

Keywords

closed hospitalshospitalssurge capacity
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Institute of Medicine: The future of emergency care in the United States health system. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48(2):115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hyde, J, Kim, B, Martinez, LS, et al. : Better prepared but spread too thin: The impact of emergency preparedness funding on local public health. Disaster Manag Response 2006;4(4):106–113.Google Scholar
3. Kaji, AH, Lewis, RJ: Hospital disaster preparedness in Los Angeles County. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(11): 1198–203.Google Scholar
4. McConnell, KJ, Richards, CF, Daya, M, et al. : Ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48(6):702–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Pham, JC, Patel, R, Millin, MG, et al. : The effects of ambulance diversion: A comprehensive review. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(11):1220–1227.Google Scholar
6. Saliba, D, Buchanan, J, Kington, RS: Function and response of nursing facilities during community disaster. Am J Public Health 2004;94(8):1436–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Bartlett, JG: Planning for avian influenza. Ann Intern Med 2006;145(2):141–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Russo, T: Pandemic planning. Emerg Med Serv 2006;35(10):51–52,54,56.Google Scholar
9. Kaji, A, Koenig, KL, Bey, T: Surge capacity for healthcare systems: A conceptual framework. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(11):1157–1159.Google Scholar
10. Kelen, GD, McCarthy, ML: The science of surge. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13: 1089–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Rothman, RE, Hsu, EB, Kahn, CA, et al. : Research priorities for surge capacity. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(11):1160–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Barnitz, L, Berkwits, M: The health care response to pandemic influenza. Ann Intern Med 2006;145(2):135–137.Google Scholar
13. Romano, M: Making room for more beds.With additional patients streaming in every day, hospitals must learn to think creatively to find space for everyone. Mod Healthc 2003;33(11):6–7, 1.Google Scholar
14. Agency For Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): Reopening shuttered hospitals to expand surge capacity. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/research/shuttered.Google Scholar
15. Hick, JL, Hanfling, D, Burstein, JL, et al. : Health care facility and community strategies for patient care surge capacity. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44(3):253–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Massachusetts Hospital Association: Massachusetts Hospitals: Closures, merges, acquisitions and affiliates. Available at http://www.mhalink.org/pub lic/mahospitals/maa.cfm#closures.Google Scholar
17. Schultz, CH, Stratton, SJ: Improving hospital surge capacity: A new concept for emergency credentialing of volunteers. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49(5):610–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. United States Department of Health and Human Services: HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan—Part 1: Strategic plan. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/pa ndemicflu/plan/part1.html.Google Scholar
19. AHRQ: Altered standards of care in mass casualty events. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/research/altstand.Google Scholar
20. Zane, RD, Prestipino A: Implementing the hospital emergency incident command system: An integrated delivery system's experience. Prehospital Disast Med 2004;19(4):311–317.Google Scholar
21. Annelli, JF: The national incident management system: A multi-agency approach to emergency response in the United States of America. Rev Sci Tech 2006;25(1):223–231.Google Scholar